I have not had time to watch this but am posting because it’s probably interesting and 9/11 deserves to be kept alive. It too was a kind of coup d’état as it ushered in the Patriot Act, the War on Terror, the Iraq War and the eventual coup d’état against Trump that’s in the news today. ABN
UPDATE: Well-worth viewing. This is a first-rate overview of 9/11, Gaza, wars for Israel, and the covid plandemic. The focus is 9/11. Gage is very good at explaining briefly what he believes happened and the evidence supporting his views. This video is very good for sending to anyone interested and anyone who still does not understand the depth and breadth of what is happening in our world. ABN
Pentagon Plane Crash Hole before the upper floors and roof collapsed
After the upper floors and roof collapsed
Moreover, a plane that size cannot possibly have flown that close to the ground at the speed claimed. We’ve seen abundant government lying in recent months and years. They lied about 9/11 too. ABN
I like talk radio. I want to listen to NPR. Many of your topics are good. But almost all of them are heavily slanted left, anti-Trump, anti-conservative, pro-Ukraine War, etc. I want to hear your side but I also want to hear the other side. It is bad media, bad for USA, and super-boring radio to feature only one side of an issue as if there is no other side at all. Indeed, most issues have several sides all worthy of discussion. Your shows would gain listeners and respect if you provided real balance. ABN
UPDATE: A good example of how bad NPR can be happened a few days ago. I was driving and a show came on NPR about how American evangelicals were supporting Trump in large numbers. One commentator was some journo who has been reporting on religion in USA for forty years; the other was some college professor of religious studies. I forget who the host was. The entire program entailed describing how evangelicals had a psychological need to be accepted and heard and that’s why they support Trump. If I am remembering correctly the speakers implied if not stated outright that evangelicals had that need because they were uneducated and lacked sophistication. I found the program extremely irritating because all three of the supposedly educated and sophisticated speakers never onceconsidered that evangelicals might like Trump’s policies because they are good policies. My sense of those three speakers is they themselves are small-minded, incurious, and selfish in how they waste airtime by telling only one side of a potentially great story. Such a waste. It was a very good topic. Next time, get some people who are able to sympathize with evangelicals and who understand Trump’s policies as they are and not as NPR frames them all the time. To be clear, I am 100% willing to listen to all positions on all topics, including what amounts to NPR propaganda, but I really really want to hear all sides. Forty years he’s been a religion journo and many years she’s been a college religion prof and they both just cooed at each other over NPR lefty banalities the entire time. The host was no better. ABN
UPDATE: I posted the above in April and am reposting it today because it provides an example of the kind of bias that has been a constant feature of NPR. Most of their broadcasting has been like this. It’s not only what they say but what they don’t say. ABN
As lead operative and narrative engineer on the ‘tick-tock’ effort, John Solomon has once again pushed his way to the front of the narrative engineering effort. As a genuinely glowing Solomon picks up the flag of attention, many people once again start to follow the shiny thing into the dead end of DC silos.
After a few weeks of heavy firing for effect, the people around President Trump, also glowing, organize an interview. John Solomon and Amanda Head then conduct an interview with President Trump. {Direct Rumble Link Here}
John Solomon used to write for The Hill, until the people within the editorial team began to label all of Solomon’s reporting as “opinion” regardless of the content. Solomon then went freelance as a journalist (backing undetermined) until eventually ending up with RealAmerica’sVoice.
Solomon’s primary source of information before and during Term-1 was Mark Meadows. Meadows fed Solomon information from his position in the House of Representatives, then from his position in the Trump administration.
Within the information control space, when you understand how “positioning” takes place, you start to notice patterns. Solomon fits a pattern of controlled information release and tradecraft. Notice how Solomon steers the conversation back to the FBI over and over again.
“If the FBI choose to _______, would you support?”… It is a repeating pattern. Once you see it, you can never return to that moment in the pantomime when you do not see it. Solomon consistently relies on structuring his reporting around FBI and DOJ activity.
“Yep”, “Yep”, “Yep.” That is what you hear from a person who understands influence by stimulating the victim’s head nodding. In professional sales it is a form of cognitive affirmation. Listen for it, listen for “yep” and count how many times you hear it. There are open conversations in/around my proximity where Solomon is considered a CIA asset.
Keep that in the back of your mind as you watch Solomon position himself to narrate what the FBI and DOJ are doing.
…Consider the following regarding the absurdity and cruelty of Holocaust Denial laws. At the post-WWII Nuremberg Trials, the Soviet delegation was led by Andrey Vyshinsky, the same judge who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Show Trials’ (1936-1938) where defendants, including Lenin’s close friends (Kamenev, Zinoviev, Bukharin and more), were tortured into confessing their guilt, and were then executed.
At the Nuremberg Trials, Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced “evidence” blaming the Germans for the massacre of 20,000+ leading Poles near Katyn and elsewhere, which many at the time, including Churchill, knew had been done by Stalin.
Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced obviously fabricated “evidence,” which can be easily verified in the official trial documentation, and has been gathered by Carlos Porter in his book Made In Russia: The Holocaust.
During that trial, the Soviets claimed that the evil non-homo sapiens maniacal Hitler-Nazis killed people via steam chambers, electrical chambers, atomic bomb-like device, having people climb trees and then cutting them down, a pedal-driven brain bashing machine, and a bone-grinding machine among other absurd-fabricated methods.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the total number of people estimated by the “official” coerced-competition-immune narrative to have been killed in Auschwitz was revised from 4 million to 1.5 million, and soon after to 1.1 million.
All alleged extermination camps have experienced similar large downward revisions. Given the above, and prior to these massive “revisions,” someone doing their moral duty of speaking the truth as they saw it, saying that the 4 million figure was a gross exaggeration, or error, or Soviet-Communist fabrication by Stalin’s legal team at the post-World-War-Two Nuremberg Trials to punish the Germans, would have been erroneously, unjustly vilified, sent to prison, or killed for resisting arrest.
I would add that since it is illegal in Europe to question the Holocaust and since even Grok is programmed to lie about, it behooves all of us to reject the entire story. ABN
…Jewish Supremists, duh. Obviously he knows this. The Overton Toilet is so full it’s overflowing. Tucker has a strong hand but also can read the bathroom. ABN
American Buddhist Net 