I like talk radio. I want to listen to NPR. Many of your topics are good. But almost all of them are heavily slanted left, anti-Trump, anti-conservative, pro-Ukraine War, etc. I want to hear your side but I also want to hear the other side. It is bad media, bad for USA, and super-boring radio to feature only one side of an issue as if there is no other side at all. Indeed, most issues have several sides all worthy of discussion. Your shows would gain listeners and respect if you provided real balance. ABN
UPDATE: A good example of how bad NPR can be happened a few days ago. I was driving and a show came on NPR about how American evangelicals were supporting Trump in large numbers. One commentator was some journo who has been reporting on religion in USA for forty years; the other was some college professor of religious studies. I forget who the host was. The entire program entailed describing how evangelicals had a psychological need to be accepted and heard and that’s why they support Trump. If I am remembering correctly the speakers implied if not stated outright that evangelicals had that need because they were uneducated and lacked sophistication. I found the program extremely irritating because all three of the supposedly educated and sophisticated speakers never onceconsidered that evangelicals might like Trump’s policies because they are good policies. My sense of those three speakers is they themselves are small-minded, incurious, and selfish in how they waste airtime by telling only one side of a potentially great story. Such a waste. It was a very good topic. Next time, get some people who are able to sympathize with evangelicals and who understand Trump’s policies as they are and not as NPR frames them all the time. To be clear, I am 100% willing to listen to all positions on all topics, including what amounts to NPR propaganda, but I really really want to hear all sides. Forty years he’s been a religion journo and many years she’s been a college religion prof and they both just cooed at each other over NPR lefty banalities the entire time. The host was no better. ABN
UPDATE: I posted the above in April and am reposting it today because it provides an example of the kind of bias that has been a constant feature of NPR. Most of their broadcasting has been like this. It’s not only what they say but what they don’t say. ABN
As lead operative and narrative engineer on the ‘tick-tock’ effort, John Solomon has once again pushed his way to the front of the narrative engineering effort. As a genuinely glowing Solomon picks up the flag of attention, many people once again start to follow the shiny thing into the dead end of DC silos.
After a few weeks of heavy firing for effect, the people around President Trump, also glowing, organize an interview. John Solomon and Amanda Head then conduct an interview with President Trump. {Direct Rumble Link Here}
John Solomon used to write for The Hill, until the people within the editorial team began to label all of Solomon’s reporting as “opinion” regardless of the content. Solomon then went freelance as a journalist (backing undetermined) until eventually ending up with RealAmerica’sVoice.
Solomon’s primary source of information before and during Term-1 was Mark Meadows. Meadows fed Solomon information from his position in the House of Representatives, then from his position in the Trump administration.
Within the information control space, when you understand how “positioning” takes place, you start to notice patterns. Solomon fits a pattern of controlled information release and tradecraft. Notice how Solomon steers the conversation back to the FBI over and over again.
“If the FBI choose to _______, would you support?”… It is a repeating pattern. Once you see it, you can never return to that moment in the pantomime when you do not see it. Solomon consistently relies on structuring his reporting around FBI and DOJ activity.
“Yep”, “Yep”, “Yep.” That is what you hear from a person who understands influence by stimulating the victim’s head nodding. In professional sales it is a form of cognitive affirmation. Listen for it, listen for “yep” and count how many times you hear it. There are open conversations in/around my proximity where Solomon is considered a CIA asset.
Keep that in the back of your mind as you watch Solomon position himself to narrate what the FBI and DOJ are doing.
…Consider the following regarding the absurdity and cruelty of Holocaust Denial laws. At the post-WWII Nuremberg Trials, the Soviet delegation was led by Andrey Vyshinsky, the same judge who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Show Trials’ (1936-1938) where defendants, including Lenin’s close friends (Kamenev, Zinoviev, Bukharin and more), were tortured into confessing their guilt, and were then executed.
At the Nuremberg Trials, Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced “evidence” blaming the Germans for the massacre of 20,000+ leading Poles near Katyn and elsewhere, which many at the time, including Churchill, knew had been done by Stalin.
Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced obviously fabricated “evidence,” which can be easily verified in the official trial documentation, and has been gathered by Carlos Porter in his book Made In Russia: The Holocaust.
During that trial, the Soviets claimed that the evil non-homo sapiens maniacal Hitler-Nazis killed people via steam chambers, electrical chambers, atomic bomb-like device, having people climb trees and then cutting them down, a pedal-driven brain bashing machine, and a bone-grinding machine among other absurd-fabricated methods.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the total number of people estimated by the “official” coerced-competition-immune narrative to have been killed in Auschwitz was revised from 4 million to 1.5 million, and soon after to 1.1 million.
All alleged extermination camps have experienced similar large downward revisions. Given the above, and prior to these massive “revisions,” someone doing their moral duty of speaking the truth as they saw it, saying that the 4 million figure was a gross exaggeration, or error, or Soviet-Communist fabrication by Stalin’s legal team at the post-World-War-Two Nuremberg Trials to punish the Germans, would have been erroneously, unjustly vilified, sent to prison, or killed for resisting arrest.
I would add that since it is illegal in Europe to question the Holocaust and since even Grok is programmed to lie about, it behooves all of us to reject the entire story. ABN
…Jewish Supremists, duh. Obviously he knows this. The Overton Toilet is so full it’s overflowing. Tucker has a strong hand but also can read the bathroom. ABN
An Iranian army sniper and a suspected terrorist with ties to Hezbollah are among illegal migrants living in the US who have been arrested by ICE since Sunday.
Ribvar Karimi, who served as an Iranian Army sniper from 2018 to 2021, was arrested in rural Alabama, where he has been living with his American wife.
When ICE agents found in him in the town of Locust Fork Sunday, he had an Islamic Republic of Iran Army identification card, DHS claimed.
Karimi entered the country legally on a K-1 visa, for foreigners engaged to be married to Americans, in October under the Biden administration.
He married his bride, Morgan Gardener, in January this year. However, Karimi failed to adjust his status, making his presence in the US illegal.
In Minnesota, agents nabbed Mehran Makari Saheli, 56, a former member of off the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps with admitted connections to Hezbollah, according to the Department of Homeland Security today.
He already had a conviction for felon in possession of a firearm and served 15 months in prison.
This story can be read as mind-control preprogramming for a series of false flag attacks inside USA; possibly leading to open USA war with Iran. There are a number of actors that might do false flags; those associated with Jewish Supremacy being the most likely. That being said, there surely are many hostile sleeper cells inside USA, including Iranian ones. ABN
This clip shows the psycholinguistic core of mind-control. Deep instinct aroused by a single word and the victim (her) will not be able to explain or describe how this came about. To her, it just is. To her controllers, this is the successful result of many years of psycholinguistic conditioning. We all are up against these forces. They can be understood and avoided or cured. But we must be conscious of the process of conditioning and willing to react to it wisely.
From a Buddhist point of view, mind-control is the polar opposite of wisdom, either doing it to others deliberately or doing it to yourself through lack of introspection. All of Buddhist practice is directed at freeing the mind from reified identity, mind-control, delusion. ABN
Karp must be asked in public many times if he is a Jewish Supremist and/or if he completely disavows Jewish Supremacy. The personal information on all Americans he will have stewardship over at Palantir is crucial to our liberty and must not fall into the hands of a Jewish Supremist. The glib nonchalance he displays in the clip above must not transfer to mind-control programs in USA, or anywhere on earth. Jewish Supremacy is a dangerous and violent cult with zero moral boundaries. No journalist who refuses to ask Karp these questions can be trusted. The term ‘far right’ in Europe, which Karp uses off-handedly, is a slur used to pejoratively describe center-right conservatives with a modicum of national awareness. Karp, I bet, supports a much further ‘far right’ in Israel and should be asked about that as well. With high office comes high responsibility. It is Karp’s duty to honestly disavow Jewish Supremacy on his own, whether he is asked or not. ABN
American Buddhist Net 