Someone inside Kaiser sent me the below internal guidance concerning shots and medications for newborns.
It tells Kaiser employees that the “approach to how we introduce and administer routine newborn … Hepatitis B vaccine” is to ” avoid saying ‘it’s optional’ or ‘you can refuse’ unless directly asked” and to tell parents that “we will be giving” instead of asking consent to give. This is the antithesis of informed consent. Yet Kaiser calls it “excellent patient and family care.”
He is leaving out covert violent attacks against rivals, especially when they are young. Attacks range from low dose poisoning to lobotomies to murder. I am not sure if Dan is aware of the scale of these attacks, but am confident he is smart enough to figure it out. Covert attacks by an army of infiltrators are extremely difficult to prove or even notice. This is especially true when attacks are directed against young people before their careers begin. Trump right now is showing conspicuous signs of possibly having been cognitively damaged or discombobulated by a targeted energy weapon or some other means. Keep this in mind the next time you see a more or less normal friend go bonkers. Our normal reaction is to assume they are losing it, started drinking or using drugs or are simply going crazy. Rarely does anyone suspect a covert attack designed to disable or control the victim. I am not saying this is definitely the case with Trump. I am saying he is an example of what you might see happening to a loved one, relative, friend or colleague. The person becomes a weird deranged version of what they were because that is how the mind is affected. From that information, most of us wrongly assume the person is simply devolving into some core state that we may or may not have thought was there. Our minds seize on simple reasons for the victim’s demise and rarely wonder if something sinister is being done to them. Consider how almost everyone is viewing Trump right now. How many suspect he may be a victim of covert violence? ABN
Under the greatest propaganda machine in human history, an international attack by every government in the world, the WHO, the WEF, the UN, all of them in lockstep with a 24-hour news cycle pounding you every single day, 30% of the world still said oh hell no.
Think about what that means. Under that kind of pressure, with your job on the line, with your ability to provide for your family on the line, 30% of people around the world held the line.
In England, experts told me 30% denied receiving a single COVID vaccine. Someone from Denmark said the same. Someone from Finland. America is right about the same. I was just in Europe weeks ago and that number kept coming up everywhere I went.
That is a rebellion army. That is an international movement that already knows the truth. 30% changes governments.
And then think about the 70% who did get that vaccine. How many of them actually wanted it? How many got it under duress because they had no other choice? I think there is at least another 20% in there who know they were lied to and are just waiting for permission to say it out loud.
I think at least half the world knows. We have got to start speaking loudly, every one of us, and speaking proudly, because if we don’t we are going to lose free speech and we are going to lose this movement, and this movement can make change not just in America but around the world.
I’ve tried calling you and texting you multiple times since the February 9th hearing on antisemitism which you and Bishop Barron were absent from. I wished to discuss this with you privately. But again, unfortunately, you’ve provided zero response to me.
However, today, you publicly made the post which I am replying to now.
You have publicly stated that you agree with Bishop Barron’s recently issued statements wholeheartedly.
Please answer this question: Why did you say to me in person on September 8th 2025, at 8:26 in the morning, “if they are going to remove you for your support of the Palestinians in Gaza, then they will try to remove me too”?
I explained to you at this meeting, that I was being asked to resign from the commission by the White House at the behest of our colleague’s Paula White and Dan Patrick. You expressed that you were shocked I was asked to resign in August because of my Catholic position on Zionism, and outspoken support of innocent human life in Gaza. You fully supported me as indicated by your words.
I had expressed to both you and Bishop Barron months before the February hearing that I was asked to be removed from this commission due to my Catholic beliefs and my support of the Palestinians in Gaza. Both of you said that would never happen. But it did.
Can you please explain to me and to all Catholics the meaning of this apparent contradiction?
If there is no contradiction between what you said to me in August and why I’m presently removed, then please explain.
I believe I was removed from the religious liberty commission in February for the same reasons I was asked to resign in August.
The excuse for removing Boller I have read is she was being ‘disruptive’ by raising the Catholic position on Zionism and pursuing a real answer. If history is a guide, the most likely explanation for the White House Religious Liberty Commission‘s cowardly actions and lame excuse is they, too, have been infiltrated by Jewish Supremacists and are not in full control of their own commission. ABN
VP JD Vance’s 35-year-old chief of staff is Jewish pro-Israel strategist Jacob Reses.
Vance delivered a Jewish wedding prayer at Reses’ wedding in January. The Vice President hardly goes anywhere without Reses and maintains a close personal relationship with him.
While opposed to mass immigration, abortion, and strong on social issues like transgenderism, Reses is a fervent Zionist who celebrated the erection of Israel’s flag “over the rubble” of Gaza.
Reses has been outspoken about his Zionism from an early age. At Princeton, Reses served as treasurer of Tigers for Israel, where he vocally criticized a pro-Palestine student group that targeted the hummus maker Sabra over its alleged links to Israeli human rights abuses in the occupied territories.
Reses has publicly advocated for a coalition between conservative Christians and Jews. In September 2025, he reposted Joe Lonsdale’s post remarking that Jews should no longer be “squeamish” about the majority’s invocation of the “Christian deity” and other elements of the Christian faith.
Former Egyptian Ambassador to Tel Aviv, Atef Salem, stated that mounting speculation suggests Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may be sheltering in fortified underground sites in Jerusalem – possibly even beneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound.
Salem emphasized that rumors can often serve as a psychological weapon during wartime but typically only gain traction when information is clouded by ambiguity. He explained that it is common for leaders to limit their public appearances for security reasons.
He added that some assessments suggest Netanyahu could be utilizing a fortified room or bunker beneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque as part of the extreme measures taken by Israeli leadership to ensure their safety during escalations.
Salem observed that the current conflict between Iran and Israel is a prime example of this dynamic. The lack of transparency surrounding events has opened the door for contradictory narratives.
He highlighted that Israel is rigorously controlling the publication of images and videos from within its borders, threatening heavy fines and penalties for anyone documenting scenes that could reveal the reality on the ground.
These restrictions—combined with limited access for field journalists—make it difficult to verify reports of damage and destruction in several Israeli cities.
Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions – also known as the fake news – have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up.
The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not.
And frankly, changing course is in their own business interests since trust in legacy media has now fallen to an all time low of just 9% and are ratings disasters.
The American people have subsidized broadcasters to the tune of billions of dollars by providing free access to the nation’s airwaves.
It is very important to bring trust back into media, which has earned itself the label of fake news.
When a political candidate is able to win a landslide election victory after in the face of hoaxes and distortions, there is something very wrong. It means the public has lost faith and confidence in the media. And we can’t allow that to happen.
I do not have an in-depth understanding of Carr, but over the years I have tended to agree with him most of the time. His statement above is a good move and will help any honest broadcaster, which few of them are. ABN
American Buddhist Net 