The decline of the West has not been caused by OnlyFans or anything like it. It has been caused by a mind-control psyop against white people. It started by relentlessly attacking white boys and men in the 1950s. Yes, boys because if you disable the best of them while they are still young, and leave them semi-functional, they will bring their communities down for years and you win. Basic unrestricted asymmetric warfare. Then in the 1960s and 70s, white women became empowered and were taught to attack white men, the patriarchy. Many are so dumb they are still doing it today. One side destroys the other, does your work for you. More basic unrestricted asymmetric warfare. Flash forward to today. White women have become Karens and/or are no longer women at all. Or have been degraded to OnlyFans. It was an easy victory by a multigenerational opponent who was willing to attack children and poison and maim anyone who might resist them well before they could or did. Surprised Felix does not know this. The decline of the West has never had an intellectual or moral cause. It is due to unrestricted, multigenerational asymmetric warfare. The rotten fruit is all around us. ABN
In her keynote address at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reaffirmed Europe’s unwavering support for Ukraine in the face of Russia’s invasion.
However, in the open admission of priority, President Von der Leyen declares the #1 priority of the corporations who run the WEF and world of politics, must be control of speech and information against their interests.
She goes on to note that political dissent, what she calls “polarization within our societies” must be controlled, as the ability of individuals and groups to assemble against the WEF plan remains a constant threat to the fulfillment of the agenda. [Insert a picture of dissident enemy #1, Donald Trump, here] Yes, you do not need to interpret their intent, you only need to listen to their words and accept them. WATCH (first two minutes):
The Rape of the Mind explores the Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. Published in 1956 and written by Joost A. M. Meerloo, M.D., Instructor in Psychiatry, Columbia University Lecturer in Social Psychology, New School for Social Research, Former Chief, Psychological Department, Netherlands Forces.
“SINCE 1933, when a completely drugged and trial-conditioned human wreck confessed to having started the Reichstag fire in Berlin, Dr. Joost A. M. Meerloo has studied the methods by which systematic mental pressure brings people to abject submission, and by which totalitarians imprint their subjective “truth” on their victims’ minds. The first two and one-half years of WWII, Dr. Meerloo spent under the pressure of Nazi-occupied Holland, witnessing at first-hand the Nazi methods of mental torture on more than one occasion…Then, after personal experiences with enforced interrogation, he escaped from a Nazi prison and certain death to England, where he was able, as Chief of the Psychological Department of the Netherlands Forces, to observe and study coercive methods officially…. After the war, he came to the United States…As more and more cases of thought control, brainwashing, and mental coercion were disclosed – Cardinal Mindszenty, Colonel Schwable, Robert Vogeler, and others – his interest grew. It was Dr. Meerloo who coined the word menticide, the killing of the spirit, for this peculiar crime…
It is Dr. Meerloo’s position that through pressure on the weak points in men’s makeup, totalitarian methods can turn anyone into a “traitor.” And in The Rape of the Mind he goes far beyond the direct military implications of mental torture to describing how our own culture unobtrusively shows symptoms of pressurizing people’s minds. He presents a systematic analysis of the methods of brainwashing and mental torture and coercion, and shows how totalitarian strategy, with its use of mass psychology, leads to systematized “rape of the mind.” He describes the new age of cold war with its mental terror, verbocracy, and semantic fog, the use of fear as a tool of mass submission and the problem of treason and loyalty, so loaded with dangerous confusion. The Rape of the Mind is written for the interested layman, not only for experts and scientists.”
Rape of the Mind is available at the link above for free or on Amazon or elsewhere.
I am posting this today because after covid and now as we move toward war with Iran and WW3, it is obvious to many of us that our minds have been raped repeatedly over many decades.
As we witness the precipitous decline of USA and the West, those of us who can see what is happening must also appreciate that all of it has been deliberate. MK-ULTRA is merely the visible sliver of a vast mind-control war of occupation and takeover which has been waged against USA and the West for over 100 years.
Meerloo does an outstanding job of describing how mind-control techniques work and which parts of human psychology allow them to work. I want to point out that mind-control alone, without violence, is a fairly weak brew. When accompanied by violence, mind-control is all but insuperable. Obvious forms of violence are imprisonment, police phalanxes, perverse laws and prosecutions, military combat.
To understand what has caused the West to decline so rapidly, one must also understand that Western people have undergone many decades of clandestine violence, secret violence, which includes, at one end of the spectrum, soft forms like reputation destruction and educational misdirection, and at the other end, poison, physical maiming, psychosurgery, sensory harm, and disease creation. Covid and the covid response in the West has all of the hallmarks of a disease-creation mind-control campaign.
It is very important to understand that clandestine violence, hidden violence, is the major factor in bringing USA and the West to this point of probably no-return we find ourselves at now.
A new study on post traumatic stress disorder shows that PTSD sufferers actually perceive meaning or emotional valence within fractions of a second.
This study bolsters the FIML claim that “psychological morphemes” (the smallest psychological unit) arise at discrete moments and that they affect whatever is perceived or thought about afterward.
The study has profound implications for all people (and I am sure animals, too) because all of us to some degree have experienced many small and some large traumas. These traumas induce a wide variety idiosyncratic “meaning and emotional valence” that affects how we perceive events happening around us, how we react to them, and how we think about them.
It is thus based on a clearly defined pool of people with “similar” extreme experiences and finds that:
…attentional biases in PTSD are [suggestively] linked to deficits in very rapid regulatory activation observed in healthy control subjects. Thus, sufferers with PTSD may literally see a world more populated by traumatic cues, contributing to a positive feedback loop that perpetuates the effects of trauma.
Of course all people are “traumatized” to some degree. And thus all people see “a world populated by traumatic cues, contributing to a positive feedback loop that perpetuates the effects of trauma.”
If we expand the word trauma to include “conditioned responses,” “learned responses,” “idiosyncratic responses,” or simply “training” or “experience” and then consider the aggregate all of those responses in any particular individual, we will have a fairly good picture of what an idiosyncratic individual (all of us are that) looks like, and how an idiosyncratic individual actually functions and responds to the world.
FIML theory claims that idiosyncratic responses happen very quickly (less than a second) and that these responses can be observed, analyzed, and extirpated (if they are detrimental) by doing FIML practice. Observing and analyzing idiosyncratic responses whether they are detrimental or not serves to optimize communication between partners by greatly enhancing partners’ ranges of emotion and understanding.
In an article about the linked study (whose main author is Rebecca Todd), Alva Noë says:
…Todd’s work shows that soldiers with PTSD “process” cues associated with their combat experience differently even than other combat veterans. But what seems to be driving the process that Todd and team uncovered is the meaningfulness or emotional valence of the cues themselves. Whether they are presented in very rapid serial display or in some other way, what matters is that those who have been badly traumatized think and feel. And surely we can modify how we think and feel through conversation?
Indeed, what makes this work so significant is the way it shows that we can only really make sense of the neural phenomena by setting them in the context of the perceptual-cognitive situation of the animal and, vice-versa, that the full-import of what perceivers say and do depends on what is going on in their heads. (Source)
I fully agree with the general sense of Noë’s words, but want to ask what is your technique for “modifying how we think and feel through conversation?” And does your technique comport well with your claim, which I also agree with, that “we can only really make sense of the neural phenomena by setting them in the context of the perceptual-cognitive situation of the animal”?
I would contend that you cannot make very good “sense of neural phenomena” by just talking about them in general ways or analyzing them based on general formulas. Some progress can be made, but it is slow and not so reliable because general ways of talking always fail to capture the idiosyncrasy of the “neural phenomenon” as it is actually functioning in real-time during a real “perceptual-cognitive situation of the animal.”
The FIML technique can capture “neural phenomena” in real-time and it can capture them during real “perceptual-cognitive situations.” It is precisely this that allows FIML practice to quickly extirpate unwholesome responses, both small and large, if desired.
Since all of us are complex individuals with a multitude of interconnected sensibilities, perceptions, and responses, FIML practice does not seek to “just” remove a single post traumatic response but rather to extirpate all unwholesome responses.
Since our complex responses and perceptions can be observed most clearly as they manifest in semiotics, the FIML “conversational” technique focuses on the signs and symbols of communication, the semiotics that comprise psychological morphemes.
FIML practice is not suited for everyone and a good partner must be found for it to work. But I would expect that combat veterans with PTSD who are able to do FIML and who do it regularly with a good partner will experience a gradual reduction in PTSD symptoms leading to eventual extirpation.
The same can be said for the rest of us with our myriad and various traumas and experiences. FIML done with a good partner will find and extirpate what you don’t want knocking around in your head anymore.
UPDATE: This essay is very important for anyone who wants to better understand human communication. I hope readers of this site will avail themselves of the opportunity to learn FIML. FIML is a major discovery in interpersonal psychology and communication. If you try it and have difficulties, feel free to email me and/or post a comment addressing your issues. If you think you already do FIML and understand it, you don’t. There is nothing like it in any literature I have seen.
For readers today who have become aware of the great extent of government and media sponsored mind-control, the linked study as well as FIML can help explain how mind-control works at very basic levels. In this context, I highly recommend: The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing. The Kindle version is just $.99 today. This book explains how humans are controlled by totalitarian regimes, a phenomenon we are surely experiencing today.
I bring the book up today because Meerloo delves deeply into how mind control techniques work at the individual level. In some ways, what he describes is 180 degrees opposite of FIML practice. FIML frees us from all forms of bad training and conditioned psychological responding, both idiosyncratic and totalitarian. Additionally, FIML helps us identify bad training at the most granular level of real-time, real-world activity. This is the opposite of mind-control. ABN
WASHINGTON DC (WSAU) – 55-year-old American journalist Gonzalo Lira has reportedly died in a Ukrainian prison after nearly eight months of imprisonment.
According to the Post Millennial, Lira was arrested by Ukrainian security in May 2023 after he was reportedly critical of President Vladimir Zelensky’s handling of the war being fought against Russian forces in Eastern Ukraine.
Lira’s comments included claims that Ukraine’s efforts to win the captured territory back have gone nowhere and their people are dying for a war that is already lost.
Gonzalo Lira Sr., provided a statement on his son’s death to The Grayzone, saying, “I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was tortured, extorted, and incommunicado for 8 months and 11 days, and the US Embassy did nothing to help my son. The responsibility of this tragedy is the dictator Zelensky, with the concurrence of a senile American president, Joe Biden.”
#15 – Repeated COVID shots weaken the immune system, according to study.
#14 – Ivermectin worked! Peer-reviewed study finds 74% reduction in excess deaths.
#13 – The unvaccinated were scapegoated for failure of COVID vaccines, study finds.
#12 – Mask wearers paradoxically had an increased risk of contracting COVID.
#11 – Natural immunity proves to be seven times more protective than vaccinated immunity.
#10 – Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.
#9 – Hospitals murdered COVID patients. The more they killed, the more money they made.
#8 – New-found emails prove Biden White House hid COVID-19 vaccine harms from the public.
#7 – The COVID shots were not the only toxic measure forced on humanity. Regular mask-wearing was also harmful.
#6 – Nearly 1 in 3 COVID vaccine recipients suffered neurological side effects.
#5 – Research finds heart anomalies within 48 hours after the COVID-19 shot.
#4 – Pfizer hid nearly 80% of COVID-19 vaccine trial deaths from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.
#3 – Perverse brainwashing techniques were thoroughly studied to get you jabbed.
#2 – The Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccine” injected into billions of arms was not the same one used in Pfizer’s clinical trials. There was a “bait-and-switch.”
#1 – Florida’s Surgeon General has called for a halt to the use of all COVID-19 mRNA injections, citing safety concerns after the discovery of billions of DNA fragments per dose in Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines.
#16: The NSA and DoD are ultimately responsible for the covid response; the vaxxes are legally countermeasures and no one will be held legally responsible for any of it; for some weird reason very few are saying this but instead focus on Big Pharma, causing some of to suspect they may be limited hangouts, part of the psyop.
#17: Covid is merely one part of an overarching psyop to gain totalitarian control of the West and then the world. Virtually everything that has happened politically during the 20th and 21st Centuries, including the plandemic, is either part of this psyop or folded into it adventitiously. ABN
Inspired by my reporting at @TheGrayzoneNews, this brilliant takedown by @propandco provides the strongest and most accessible refutation of the bogus atrocity propaganda Israel concocted to justify its genocidal rampage in Gaza
1. I do not believe that global pandemics of acute respiratory illnesses are immunologically possible.
2. Even if they were possible, we have not experienced a very serious event, allegedly since 1918 (“Spanish Flu Pandemic”). It turns out even that is either faked or tremendously exaggerated, largely quite recently (the last 20-25 years). So why even the claimed need to transfer sovereignty to a central body?
3. Imagine despite the foregoing there was a “genuine, severe pandemic”. Let us compare outcomes in the current context and under the WHO treaty.
a. This is by definition a novel situation. Nobody knows the best course of action. This means WHO definitely doesn’t know. So why in the world would you want them to be deciding things?
b. When humans have faced novel challenges in the past, we have a brilliant system to determine the best response as well as to learn what’s definitely not a good idea. It’s that groups locally decide what’s best for them and this is communicated dynamically. We’ll benefit from rapid, empirical evidence linking interventions and outcomes. If there’s an obviously best response, everyone will them learn of this, together with all the suboptimal things to avoid.
c. “Those who would exchange liberty for safety will get neither liberty nor safety”. Even if a 3rd party could claim it knew best, I’d still prefer each nation to make its own decisions and face their electorates in the next elections.
4. Now let’s examine what could go wrong. I am if the view that this is solely about control and malign misuse of the power to control an entire planet. If I’m right, soon after these instruments come into force, an event will be said to have occurred which triggers the new powers. WHO, now effectively World King, can order whatever they want. Lockdowns, mandated testing, isolation and even medical treatment (including especially mRNA based injections).
A new study from Syracuse University’s Newhouse School of Public Communications found that just 3.4% of American journalists are Republicans.
The study is based “on an online survey with 1,600 U.S. journalists conducted in early 2022” and is the latest in a series of studies stretching back to 1971 that take the temperature of the fourth estate’s partisan lean, job satisfaction, and professional attitudes.
When the first iteration of the study came out over 50 years ago, 35.5% of respondents said they were Democrats, 25.7% said they were Republicans, and 32.5% said they were Independents. The percentage that call themselves Democrats or independents have bounced around over the years, with the proportion of Democrats reaching a high of 44.1% in 1992…
…To sum up the process of making a word a cheer or boo word, it is essentially a matter of creating a conditioned reflex. By multiplying the word’s conceptual meanings to the point of disappearance and making its affective meaning massively predominant, the meaning maker causes us to associate its mere sound with the idea of goodness or badness, and so we feel joyful anticipation or disapproval and revulsion as the case may be. In doing these things the meaning maker follows Ivan Pavlov, who conditioned his dogs to associate the sound of a bell with the idea of being fed, which made them salivate. We end up reacting to the stimulus automatically, our thinking minds playing no part.
The case of an expression like “anti-Semitism” is slightly different in that this has a determinate conceptual meaning, which it wears on its face. As long as we ignore the fact that Arabs are Semites too, we can see that it means being against or disliking Jews. To make “anti-Semitism” a boo word it was therefore necessary to concentrate mainly on maximising its affective meaning, which is to say conditioning us to see disliking Jews as bad, in contrast to disliking the French or Germans, say, which we could continue to do with impunity. This again was accomplished by modelling, not by reason, as can be confirmed by reflecting that we have never heard an argument to say why disliking Jews is bad: that is, unless you call it an argument to suggest should this sentiment arise in us it would mean that we wanted to exterminate the race, for having misgivings about the behaviour of Jews, we have been encouraged to believe, would be equivalent to commissioning the construction of gas chambers.
Thus the media place Jews in a special class simply by acting as though they were in one, and we pick the idea up. It is the same back-to-front process as with “racism”, whereby we accept that something is bad because we see it disapproved of rather than disapproving of it because we think it is bad: a process that can occur because we accept the authority of the media or other meaning maker. Once “anti-Semitism” is established as a boo word, it is too late to enquire what Jews have done to deserve their special status. How dare one ask the question when Jews are such special people?
According to a count of all the words used in books published between 1960 and 2019, “anti-Semitism” is top dog among racial boo words, coming far ahead even of “racism”, let alone such comparatively paltry failings as xenophobia and White supremacy.[7]https://www.bitchute.com/embed/jCgn8FVzkN29/ So while racism in general is bad, this particular variety of it is gigantically bad, which might have something to do with the fact that the mass media and publishing industry are largely owned by Jews.
As the gold standard of racial badness, and indeed of all possible badness, anti-Semitism acts as the measure of other offences, so that it is asked, for example, whether anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. People have gone on demonstrations holding placards saying that it is not. If they are mistaken, then anti-Zionism is a no-no, whereas if they are correct it is OK. What can never be doubted is that anti-Semitism is as bad as bad can be.
If only more of us understood how badly language normally operates. In this, Buddhists can see the utility of sunyata, emptiness. Affect with no meaning. Empty words both run and ruin our lives. ABN
American Buddhist Net 