At 31 click “more replies” for more.

The number of girls wanting sex-change has grown enormously; author claims it’s a fad

A fad with serious consequences. This is a well-researched article with a clear point of view.

…Nearly all of these detransitioners blame the adults in their lives, especially the medical professionals, for encouraging and facilitating their transitions rather than questioning them.

The book Silicon Valley tried to kill: ABIGAIL SHRIER’S investigation into the exploding numbers of girls wanting to change sex has caused an outcry in America – but her story must be heard

Georgia State Senate meeting on 2020 Election Fraud 12/30/20

This video is absolutely worth viewing. It’s long so jump around to get an idea of how the fraud happened. The testimony is riveting, detailed, and provided by highly credentialed experts. Given the importance of this election and the importance of fair elections to our political system, the testimony presented in this video is crucial to understanding what our country is facing today.

Georgia: Burden of proof is on officials not citizens

It is not the duty of citizens to prove election fraud happened. It is the duty of election officials and legislators to prove fraud could not have happened. By no stretch of the imagination can they do this in Georgia and elsewhere: thus election results are at best uncertifiable.

It is not necessary to prove election fraud but only to show that significant fraud could have happened. What we see in Georgia and other swing states is not only that fraud could have happened but that it obviously did happen. The odds of so many unprecedent anomalies and irregularities all being in favor of Biden are so small, it is obvious election fraud happened and that it was massive. Biden did not win. Trump did. No reasonable person who looks at the evidence can conclude otherwise.

Election results in Georgie and other swing states are clearly uncertifiable. It is the duty of state legislatures to ensure that their election have been run fairly and results have not been tampered with, that they are not fraudulent; that there has been no ballot stuffing, that ballot counting was honest and observed by both sides, that voting machines were not connected to the internet and that they could not possibly have been manipulated by anyone at any time. Georgia and other swing states cannot do this. It is a national disgrace that mainstream media, virtually all Democrats and far too many Republicans dare pretend otherwise.

Asymptomatic spread of covid? Evidence saying otherwise buried

The justification for masks and lockdowns has been that asymptomatic carriers of covid are major spreaders of the disease. Yet there is significant evidence showing otherwise; that asymptomatic carriers do not spread the disease at all.

The conclusion is not that asymptomatic spread is rare or that the science is uncertain. The study revealed something that hardly ever happens in these kinds of studies. There was not one documented case. Forget rare. Forget even Fauci’s previous suggestion that asymptomatic transmission exists but not does drive the spread. Replace all that with: never. At least not in this study for 10,000,000.

Stringent COVID-19 control measures were imposed in Wuhan between January 23 and April 8, 2020. Estimates of the prevalence of infection following the release of restrictions could inform post-lockdown pandemic management. Here, we describe a city-wide SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening programme between May 14 and June 1, 2020 in Wuhan. All city residents aged six years or older were eligible and 9,899,828 (92.9%) participated. No new symptomatic cases and 300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases. 107 of 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19 patients tested positive again (re-positive rate 0.31%, 95% CI 0.423–0.574%). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan was therefore very low five to eight weeks after the end of lockdown. (Asymptomatic Spread Revisited)

One might suppose that this would be huge news. It would allow us to open up everything immediately. With the whole basis for post-curve-flattening lockdowns crumbled, we could go back to living a normal life. The fear could evaporate. We could take comfort in our normal intuition that healthy people can get out and about with no risk to others. We could take off our masks. We could go to movies and sports events. 

Given this evidence, it is more than reasonable to suspect lockdowns have been intended to transfer wealth from small businesses to big while also crushing the middle classes into subservience. Independent thought and action is further suppressed by mandating masks, while also hiding evidence about them.

“The Justices went into a closed room…When Texas case was brought up he heard screaming through the walls as Justice Roberts and the other liberal Justices were insisting…afraid of what would happen if they did right thing…”

Your country has raised you to our highest moral and intellectual status and you cannot act, refuse to act; afraid of disturbances that only your actions can ultimately prevent.

EDIT 4:20: This seems to be the original source of the story: Loud Arguments in US Supreme Court Chambers over Texas Lawsuit. It’s credible hearsay. I am in favor of posting it because SCOTUS themselves refused to hear evidence of election fraud. Here’s another one: Washington Insider Reports Shouting, Conflict in Supreme Court Over Refusal to Hear Texas Lawsuit.

YouTube version; prompted 1:32:30.

MOTION OF DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, TO INTERVENE IN HIS PERSONAL CAPACITY AS CANDIDATE FOR RE-ELECTION, PROPOSED BILL OF COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE

Well-worth reading. A sample below:

…In the 2020 election, under the guise of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, election officials in several key states, sometimes on their own and sometimes in connection with court actions brought by partisan advocates, made a systematic effort to weaken measures to ensure fair and impartial elections by creating new rules for the conduct of the elections—rules that were never approved by the legislatures of the defendant states as required by Article II of the United States Constitution. These new rules were aimed at weakening, ignoring, or overriding provisions of state law that are aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process.


As more particularly alleged in the Bill of Complaint filed by the State of Texas, for the first time in history, these officials flooded their States with millions of ballots sent through the mail, or placed in drop boxes, with little or no chain of custody and, at the same time, intentionally weakened or eliminated the few existing security measures protecting the integrity of the vote—signature verification and witness requirements.


For example, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State issued guidance purporting to suspend the signature verification requirements, in direct violation of state law. In Michigan, the Secretary of State illegally flooded the state with absentee ballot applications mailed to every registered voter despite the fact that state law strictly limits the ballot application process. In Wisconsin, the largest cities all deployed hundreds of unmanned, unsecured absentee ballot drop boxes that were all invalid means of returning absentee votes under state law. In Georgia, the Secretary of State instituted a series of unlawful policies, including processing ballots weeks before election day and destructively revising signature and identity verification procedures.


In all cases, absentee ballots were mailed to people without even a perfunctory attempt to verify the recipient’s identity or eligibility to vote, including residency, citizenship, and criminal records. When returned and counted, the ballots were typically separated from their security envelopes, divorcing them from any information that could have helped determine whether the votes were legally cast. (link to original)

The president’s martial law powers explained & why he may need to use them

I do not mind saying that the Nov 3 election is obviously rife with fraud; and that if relevant state legislatures do not either decertify or redo their elections; and/or if the Supreme Court does not rule in a way that significantly corrects fraudulent returns; I favor president Trump using his martial law powers to: 1) either redo the election under the auspices of the US military; or 2) redress the wrongs by other reasonable legal means. In my view, if this election stands as is, our republic is finished.

The video below provides a good explanation of how and why martial law is a reasonable course of action, all others failing.

Edit 10 AM: Texas Sues: Looks Like A Game Changer

MSM more irritating than usual this morning. So I answer back

Every morning I check Google newsfeed to get a sense of where MSM is pushing its viewers. The feed this morning was more irritating than usual; in particular there were several stories slurring the marvelous Melissa Carone simply because she dared to testify on election fraud:

In response, it seems only right to post compromising information on Biden that has been studiously avoided by MSM. Make of it what you will.

The link below though digitally blurred is not for minors or those of tender sensibilities.
Exclusive! Hunter Biden’s Sex Tapes, The CCP’s “BGY” Infiltration in the U.S., Evil Alliance to Dominate the World

Election fraud: Witnesses testify at Michigan House Oversight Committee

I am starting this video at 2:55:15 with the testimony of Retired Army Colonel Phil Waldron, who was an information warfare officer and is an expert on automated voting machines and how to hack them for malign purposes. I recommend starting with his testimony because he has expert knowledge and explains his findings very clearly.

There are many other important witnesses in this video. You can click anywhere and find someone saying something interesting. Due to the grave importance of this election, all of us should do our best to be as informed as possible. I find much of this testimony riveting.