Black Biology Matters: The Southport Killer Was Created by Leftist Lies

Vile individual.” That was how Sir Keir Starmer, Britain’s leftist prime minister, has described Axel Rudakubana, the teenaged Rwandan Black who horrifically murdered three White schoolgirls in Southport last year. Starmer was wrong. Rudakubana isn’t vile. He’s pathetic. He didn’t choose to be born in Britain. He didn’t choose to possess the Black genetics that made him much more susceptible both to psychosis and to committing violent crime. Like the many Black killers who came before him and the many Black killers who will come after him, he is a product of Black biology, which evolved in Africa and should never have been exported from Africa.

That’s why the only “vile individuals” in the story of the Southport killer are leftists like Keir Starmer. For decades they’ve made conscious choices to import and incubate Third-World pathologies on British soil against the clear opposition of the White majority. They’ve sacralized non-Whites, incited non-Whites to hatred and resentment against Whites, and demonized everyone who speaks the truth about non-White pathologies. Rudakubana’s horrific murders were the fruit of leftism and leftist lies. His psychosis is clearly visible in the now infamous photo of him taken after his arrest. With his crazed hair and twisted expression, Rudakubana looks utterly and appropriately alien. After all, he’s Black and Britain is White. Rudakubana is a glaring and ugly example of a great but forbidden truth: that Black Biology Matters. And it matters because it creates Black pathologies like murder, rape and educational failure.

link

Whites need to build a community of white-white fellowship that is able to talk about the world without pretending, minus the brainwashing, minus the woke-speak. We can and should blame leaders in white countries who have deliberately ruined their nations through immigration. But we also have to blame ourselves for collectively not speaking truthfully to each other or listening carefully to each other when truth is spoken to us. There are racial truths, cultural truths, intelligence truths, biological truths and so on. There is no need for all of us to agree on every point but we need way more of us to be able to at least listen to every point, if not speak on it. I guarantee you the rest of the world talks about whites all the time. They know our weaknesses (soft, generalized morality); what we fear (being called racist or antisemitic); what we believe (all people are the same); how we are ruled (by corrupt media and political brainwashing); who we think we are (we have no culture). And they know how to exploit our resources, get handouts, run clan-based gangs, demand anything they want loudly enough and get it. To understand and take on these very serious problems facing USA and Europe, we have to be able to describe and discuss them in honest detail. The article posted above is strong medicine but worth reading for its content, if only to toughen your spirit. Whites used to be 40% of the world. Today we are 8.5%. ABN

Trump Executive Order Threatening to Pull Funding from Schools Promoting DEI and Trans Ideology Could Spell Doom for Leftist Schools in Maine

President Donald Trump’s Wednesday executive order combating radical gender ideology and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) education in public schools could prove disastrous for Maine’s far-left school districts, which could risk losing part of their funding.

[RELATED: Maine Education Department Tells Public Schools to Ignore Trump’s Order on Transgender Ideology…

“Parents trust America’s schools to provide their children with a rigorous education and to instill a patriotic admiration for our incredible Nation and the values for which we stand,” said President Trump.

“In recent years, however, parents have witnessed schools indoctrinate their children in radical, anti-American ideologies while deliberately blocking parental oversight,” he added.

Trump’s order takes aim at radical gender ideology, which says a person can be born into the wrong body and encourages children to undergo irreversible chemical or surgical procedures to make them appear more like the opposite sex.

link

Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation — Executive Order

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Policy and Purpose.  Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child’s sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions.  This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation’s history, and it must end.

Countless children soon regret that they have been mutilated and begin to grasp the horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding.  Moreover, these vulnerable youths’ medical bills may rise throughout their lifetimes, as they are often trapped with lifelong medical complications, a losing war with their own bodies, and, tragically, sterilization.

Accordingly, it is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called “transition” of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.

Sec. 2.  Definitions.  For the purposes of this order:

(a)  The term “child” or “children” means an individual or individuals under 19 years of age.

(b)  The term “pediatric” means relating to the medical care of a child.

(c)  The phrase “chemical and surgical mutilation” means the use of puberty blockers, including GnRH agonists and other interventions, to delay the onset or progression of normally timed puberty in an individual who does not identify as his or her sex; the use of sex hormones, such as androgen blockers, estrogen, progesterone, or testosterone, to align an individual’s physical appearance with an identity that differs from his or her sex; and surgical procedures that attempt to transform an individual’s physical appearance to align with an identity that differs from his or her sex or that attempt to alter or remove an individual’s sexual organs to minimize or destroy their natural biological functions.  This phrase sometimes is referred to as “gender affirming care.”

Continue reading “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation — Executive Order”

Prioritizing Military Excellence and Readiness — Executive Order

Recently, however, the Armed Forces have been afflicted with radical gender ideology to appease activists unconcerned with the requirements of military service like physical and mental health, selflessness, and unit cohesion.  Longstanding Department of Defense (DoD) policy (DoD Instruction (DoDI) 6130.03) provides that it is the policy of the DoD to ensure that service members are “[f]ree of medical conditions or physical defects that may reasonably be expected to require excessive time lost from duty for necessary treatment or hospitalization.”  As a result, many mental and physical health conditions are incompatible with active duty, from conditions that require substantial medication or medical treatment to bipolar and related disorders, eating disorders, suicidality, and prior psychiatric hospitalization.

Consistent with the military mission and longstanding DoD policy, expressing a false “gender identity” divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service.  Beyond the hormonal and surgical medical interventions involved, adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual’s sex conflicts with a soldier’s commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even in one’s personal life.  A man’s assertion that he is a woman, and his requirement that others honor this falsehood, is not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member. 

For the sake of our Nation and the patriotic Americans who volunteer to serve it, military service must be reserved for those mentally and physically fit for duty.  The Armed Forces must adhere to high mental and physical health standards to ensure our military can deploy, fight, and win, including in austere conditions and without the benefit of routine medical treatment or special provisions.

link

Fake ‘religious’ immigration scams

__________

This fails the morality and ethics test. Jews do it too with HIAS, which Mayorkas once headed, which thereby fails the ethics test even worse. I am sure there are many other ‘religious’ groups working some angle of the immigration scam and profiting handsomely. I do not know of any Buddhists groups involved in immigration scams and I hope there are none. The Abrahamics all seem to have a very passionate and active sense of what moral behavior is. And this seems to lead to many ethically very low interpretations. In Buddhism, morality is understood more as ‘coolness’ (shila) which allows or encourages thinking more deeply before acting. If a person is healthy and can work but poor, Buddhism is OK with temporary help to get them going but not permanent handouts. Scamming taxpayers to make money on able-bodied immigrants is actually immoral in Buddhism because you are doing neither the taxpayer nor the immigrant any good at all. You are duping the taxpayer and stealing while encouraging dependency and law-breaking in the immigrant. Moreover, you yourself, the ‘religious’ person posturing as a moral person, are also harming yourself with egregiously selfish behavior for mere money or conquest, if that’s how you see it. If that is how you see yourself, as a conqueror, you are not. You are just a parasite, a lowly piece of shit. ABN

Major government agency responds furiously after Trump’s late-night purge as it issues thinly-veiled threat

The Chairperson for Inspector generals has hit back at Donald Trump‘s mass firing of government watchdogs, claiming the move is ‘not legally sufficient’ in a strongly-worded letter. 

Late Friday night, the newly-minted leader announced the firing of 17 Inspector Generals, sparking major concern on Capitol Hill.

The White House failed to publicly announce the bloodbath or provide any explanation for why it fired the officials who are tasked with evaluating federal departments on issues including the law and use of taxpayer money.

IGs for the departments of defense, state, transportation, veterans affairs, housing and urban development, interior and energy were all let go. 

But soon after Hannibal ‘Mike’ Ware, Chairperson of the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, challenged the decision in a thinly-veiled threating letter. 

According to the Post, Ware is one of the agents who was fired on Friday night. 

Others include Michael Horowitz at the Justice Department who was an appointee of Obama and Mark Lee Greenblatt of the Department of the Interior. 

link

When the watchdogs don’t bark, they should be fired. Trump appears to be firing anyone who might obstruct deep reform. This is a very good sign. USA needs a strong and peaceful revolution in government. Trump is our best hope for deep reform. During his first term and all along, many IGs have been part of the coverup, not reform. I was surprised and pleased to see Horowitz on this list as the rumor was he was going to be spared. An IG is a deeply important arbiter of morality and ethics, without which our nation cannot survive. USA needs a deep housecleaning and this is part of that. ABN

Penetrating insight. Something we all require. Religion and real-world morality go hand-in-hand. I love it when prominent people reform. It’s terrible to see nastiness all the way to the top. Thune may set a good example which may shine for generations. ABN

HOLDING FORMER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLEFOR ELECTION INTERFERENCE AND IMPROPER DISCLOSUREOF SENSITIVE GOVERNMENTAL INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE ORDER January 20, 2025

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1.  Purpose.  In the closing weeks of the 2020 Presidential campaign, at least 51 former intelligence officials coordinated with the Biden campaign to issue a letter discrediting the reporting that President Joseph R. Biden’s son had abandoned his laptop at a computer repair business.  Signatories of the letter falsely suggested that the news story was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

Before being issued, the letter was sent to the CIA Prepublication Classification Review Board, the body typically assigned to formally evaluate the sensitive nature of documents prior to publication.  Senior CIA officials were made aware of the contents of the letter, and multiple signatories held clearances at the time and maintained ongoing contractual relationships with the CIA.

Federal policymakers must be able to rely on analysis conducted by the Intelligence Community and be confident that it is accurate, crafted with professionalism, and free from politically motivated engineering to affect political outcomes in the United States.  The signatories willfully weaponized the gravitas of the Intelligence Community to manipulate the political process and undermine our democratic institutions.  This fabrication of the imprimatur of the Intelligence Community to suppress information essential to the American people during a Presidential election is an egregious breach of trust reminiscent of a third world country.  And now the faith of Americans in all other patriotic intelligence professionals who are sworn to protect the Nation has been imperiled.

National security is also damaged by the publication of classified information.  Former National Security Advisor John R. Bolton published a memoir for monetary gain after he was terminated from his White House position in 2019.  The book was rife with sensitive information drawn from his time in government.  The memoir’s reckless treatment of sensitive information undermined the ability of future presidents to request and obtain candid advice on matters of national security from their staff.  Publication also created a grave risk that classified material was publicly exposed.

To remedy these abuses of the public trust, this Order directs the revocation of any active or current security clearances held by:  (i) the former intelligence officials who engaged in misleading and inappropriate political coordination with the 2020 Biden presidential campaign; and (ii) John R. Bolton.

Sec. 2.  Policy.  (a)  It is the policy of the United States to ensure that the Intelligence Community not be engaged in partisan politics or otherwise used by a U.S. political campaign for electioneering purposes.  The term “Intelligence Community” has the meaning given the term in section 3003 of title 50, United States Code.

(b)  It is the policy of the United States that individuals who hold government-issued security clearances should not use their clearance status to influence U.S. elections.

(c)  It is the policy of the United States that classified information not be publicly disclosed in memoirs, especially those published for personal monetary gain.

Sec. 3.  Implementation.  (a)  Effective immediately, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, shall revoke any current or active clearances held by the following individuals:

              (1)  James R. Clapper Jr.

              (2)  Michael V. Hayden

              (3)  Leon E. Panetta

              (4)  John O. Brennan

Continue reading “HOLDING FORMER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS ACCOUNTABLEFOR ELECTION INTERFERENCE AND IMPROPER DISCLOSUREOF SENSITIVE GOVERNMENTAL INFORMATION”

Canadian Doctors Suggest Harvesting Organs From Euthanasia Patients Before They’re Dead

Canadian doctors have suggested killing euthanasia victims by taking their organs, according to multiple reports, whistleblowers, and public talks. Medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties between “medical assistance in dying” (MAID) and organ harvesting.

“The best use of my organs, if I’m going to receive a medically assisted death, might be to not first kill me and then retrieve my organs, but to have my mode of death — as we medically consider death now — to be to retrieve my organs,” said Rob Sibbald, an ethicist of the London Health Sciences Centre in Ontario.

Other Canadian doctors have publicly embraced “death by donation,” and a study came out earlier this year exploring euthanasia programs such as MAID as a means of organ harvesting. Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016, and since then the number of Canadians using MAID to kill themselves has significantly increased.

link