“My child underwent surgery for a throat hemangioma at Henan Provincial People’s Hospital. After the surgery, the child became vegetative, and then I discovered the child’s eyeballs were gone—they had been removed. Various departments in the hospital are altering the medical records… For profit, stealing and selling patients’ organs.”
The video details an alleged incident in Henan Province where a 9-year-old girl underwent throat surgery at a local hospital, emerged in a vegetative state, and had her eyeballs removed without consent, with hospital records reportedly altered to cover up suspected organ trafficking for profit.
The 24-second video features the girl’s mother recounting the events, hospital exterior shots, and the child in a bed with bandaged eyes, aligning with broader 2025 reports of a surge in Chinese organ harvesting claims, though this specific case lacks independent verification from major outlets.
__________
As with all things in China, it is impossible to prove these allegations.
This story has been appearing in social media and is believed true by many Chinese commentators.
Grok has this to say about the case: This mother’s narration describes an unverified organ trafficking claim. Officially documented facts of the case involve only medical negligence and record tampering, not organ removal.
It is widely believed in China and around the world that illegal organ harvesting is practiced in China for sale to the wealthy and elite.
In Cambodia, Scam Compounds or Scam Parks have repeatedly been accused of organ harvesting. These compounds appear to be a major reason for the Thai-Cambodia conflict raging today.
The most chilling claims against Cambodian Scam Parks involve ‘baby-farming’, where young women are kidnapped and forced to bear IVF pregnancies, so their babies’ organs can be removed and sold. It is widely believed the CCP is running these compounds. ABN
To communicate, we often must ignore the truth or falsity of a statement, our own or someone else’s.
I believe it is an instinct to do this; that it is part of our instinct to communicate at all. Communication requires cooperation, an agreement to be agreeable enough to get the message through.
We might call ignoring truth or falsity in communication “truth elision” or “psychological elision.” Elision means to omit something. Psychological elision would mean omitting or not mentioning psychological truths.
We do a lot of truth elision to save time. In professional or group settings it is hard to communicate any other way because there is not enough time to be perfectly truthful and most people will not care. They just want to socialize and/or get the job done, not search for truth.
Most communication is like that. Most messages are not even superficially analyzed. Semiotics glide through our minds without any thought to their deep origins or interpretations. Truth and falsity are frequently elided.
Like all instincts, our instinct to cooperate by ignoring the truth or falsity of many statements can be misused to consciously deceive.
Indeed, we frequently deceive even ourselves by accepting our own statements as true when analysis would show they are not. One way we succeed in doing this to ourselves is by simply avoiding the analysis—analysis elision.
This is where a simple instinct starts to go bad. A basic need to cooperate on the signs and symbols of communication gets twisted into tricking people, deceiving them, even deceiving ourselves.
The way to see this most clearly and to stop doing it with at least one other person is FIML practice. One of my main goals for this website is to show how and why communication goes bad and how and why it harms us. At the same time, I present a practical way to fix the problem described—FIML.
_________________
I think the above sheds light on false confessions and pretty much all self-abnegating lying on the spectrum trending down from a false confession with legal consequences.
Abusers work these ill-defined and difficult to grasp areas to dominate, entrap, and manipulate others. Narcissists and other “strong” or “clever” dark personality types use our fundamental willingness to cooperate against us.
Gas lighting greatly relies on people’s willingness to ignore truths and accept falsities about themselves. If there is more than one gas lighter at work, victims may even accept blame for things they know with certainty are not true.
As with so much in this world, immoral people put time and energy into fooling those who have not put time or energy into the dark arts.
Mass mind-control preys on our mass susceptibility to believe the story that first comes out; the story that is approved by the ‘authorities’ and mass media; the story that is embraced and recited by our friends and family. Mind-control relies on our need to conform and our fear of being ostracized and criticized for straying from the mass instinct to be the same as others.
Buddhists all know about wise compassion. We also need wise understanding of the world and wise cautiousness about the full scope of human motivations.
Our tendencies to go along with falsity can be seen in every part of life, from small corners of our own lives to the great expanses of entire societies.
I’ve never been a fan of Jones but have been OK with his doing what he does, until this — implying Candace Owens might be having a ‘mental-breakdown, psychosis’.
That is disgraceful, super-dishonest and dangerous to Owens, who is arguably the best journalist in the world today.
I don’t know how much Jones was paid to say this or if he is just a total POS. Either way, he went from sort of OK in my mind to total garbage, a backstabber.
Jones’ talk is classic mind-control preprogramming before someone is suicided, lobotomized, drugged into psychosis or murdered in public like Charlie Kirk.
It is chilling, horrible. No way, Jones doesn’t know what he’s doing
Candace Owens is pioneering crowd-sourced journalism in real-time.
The information she discovers herself and receives from others is provocative, relevant, significant and fascinating.
This video is appearing today on social media as if it were new, but is actually from an incident in Henan in 2019. Read comments at the link above for a variety of reactions. Bullying is not uncommon in China, though as with everything in China, there are no reliable statistics. In Japan it is widely known that bullying is a serious problem. ABN
__________
Chinese translation:
「打她！」（多次重複）
「踹她！」
「別錄了！」
受害者哭喊：「不要！」 「啊！」（尖叫與求饒）
English Translation:
Victim’s cries: “No!” “Don’t!” “Ah!” (screams and pleas for mercy)
“Hit her!” (repeated several times)
“Kick her!”
“Stop recording!”
Bullying in China
Bullying in Chinese schools is a significant and complex issue, with research indicating a high prevalence. A 2016 nationwide survey of over 100,000 students across 29 counties found that 33.36% of students experienced bullying, with 4.7% reporting frequent incidents and 28.66% occasional ones. However, reported statistics vary widely; one study cited in a YouTube video claims 75% of children in China have experienced bullying, while another suggests only 11% report being bullied, highlighting inconsistencies in measurement and definition. This discrepancy underscores the difficulty in accurately assessing the scope of the problem.
The nature of bullying in China is often described as more indirect and subtle compared to physical bullying common in Western countries. Tactics frequently involve social exclusion, verbal abuse, and psychological torment, such as mocking a student’s appearance or using symbolic items (e.g., watermelon-themed objects) to humiliate them in a way that may not be immediately obvious to adults. Group dynamics play a central role, with bullying typically involving multiple students ganging up on a single victim, reflecting China’s collectivist culture where group identity can reduce individual accountability.
The causes of bullying are multifaceted. Research identifies factors such as family environment, including authoritarian parenting and corporal punishment, which may model aggressive behavior. The influence of Confucian values and social Darwinism—where success is tied to competition and survival of the fittest—can justify bullying against those perceived as weak, such as students with poor academic performance or social awkwardness. Additionally, the normalization of teacher-led humiliation and physical punishment in schools may contribute to students imitating such behavior.
Bullying in Japan
Bullying in Japan, known as “ijime,” remains a persistent and serious issue across all school levels, with recent data indicating a record high in incidents. In fiscal year 2024, the Japanese education ministry confirmed 769,022 cases of bullying, marking the fourth consecutive year of record-high numbers and an increase of approximately 36,400 from the previous year. The majority of cases occurred at elementary schools (610,612), followed by junior high schools (135,865), with smaller numbers at senior high schools (18,891) and special needs schools (3,654).
The problem is particularly severe in terms of its consequences, with serious cases such as suicide and truancy rising to a record 1,405, an increase of 99 from the previous year. This reflects a broader trend of escalating severity, with incidents often involving group dynamics where a student perceived as “different” is ostracized by peers, sometimes leading to the entire class participating in the bullying. This form of group bullying, or “shūdan ijime,” is deeply rooted in Japanese societal values that emphasize conformity and group harmony, where deviation from the norm is met with social punishment.
This video is from 2021 and well illustrates my point. The children, ages 8-12, are being detained for picking flowers and wild vegetables near their homes. That alone will affect them emotionally, but how many of them are going to be lobotomized? Not saying that has happened to these kids, but psychosurgery is a very simple way to subdue an entire population if enough of the children and young people are maimed. Put on your strongest realist hat and realize how effective this strategy is, especially when done over several generations. I bet there are few authoritarian states with hated minorities who are not doing this. ABN
Videogame executive Xu Bo, said to have more than 100 children, and other elites build mega-families, testing citizenship laws and drawing on nannies, IVF and legal firms set up to help them
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right. Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again. A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental rights to at least four unborn children, and the court’s additional research showed that he had already fathered or was in the process of fathering at least eight more—all through surrogates.
When Pellman called Xu Bo in for a confidential hearing in the summer of 2023, he never entered the courtroom, according to people who attended the hearing. The maker of fantasy videogames lived in China and appeared via video, speaking through an interpreter. He said he hoped to have 20 or so U.S.-born children through surrogacy—boys, because they’re superior to girls—to one day take over his business. Several of his kids were being raised by nannies in nearby Irvine as they awaited paperwork to travel to China. He hadn’t yet met them, he told the judge, because work had been busy.
Pellman was alarmed, according to the people who attended the hearing. Surrogacy was a tool to help people build families, but what Xu was describing didn’t seem like parenting, the people said. The judge denied his request for parentage—normally quickly approved for the intended parents of a baby born through surrogacy, experts say. The decision left the children he’d paid for to be born in legal limbo.
The court declined to comment on Xu’s case. Xu, an online megaposter but real-life recluse, has rarely spoken with reporters and hasn’t been photographed in public for nearly a decade. A representative of Xu’s company, Duoyi Network, didn’t respond to specific questions about the hearing or Xu’s use of surrogacy. “The boss does not accept interview requests from anyone for any purpose,” the representative said in an email to The Wall Street Journal, adding that “much of what you described is untrue”. The representative, who didn’t provide a name, didn’t respond to repeated requests to clarify what was inaccurate.
…According to a letter from experts in this field to the Lancet, studies of other wars – most of them far less destructive than Israel’s on the tiny enclave – indicate that between three and 15 times more people are killed by indirect, rather than direct, methods of warfare.
The authors conservatively estimate an indirect death toll four times greater than the direct death toll. That would mean, at a minimum, 350,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza through Israel’s actions.
The reality is likely to be even worse. That is without even mentioning the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who have been left with horrific injuries and psychological trauma.
Israel’s war planners know exactly how this direct-to-indirect ratio works. Which is why they chose to destroy nearly every home in Gaza, to bomb the power, sanitation and water facilities, to level the hospitals, and to block aid month after month.
They knew this would be the way Israel could carry out a genocide while offering its allies – western governments and its army of lobbyists – a “get out of jail card” for their active complicity.
Donald Trump’s so-called “ceasefire” is just another layer of deception in this endless game of smoke and mirrors. The UN’s child protection agency, Unicef, reports that less than a quarter of aid trucks are getting into Gaza, past Israel’s continuing starvation blockade, despite Israeli commitments agreed as part of the “ceasefire”. Apparently, this doesn’t register as a gross ceasefire violation. It goes unnoticed.
Unicef reports further that in October alone, at the start of the “ceasefire”, nearly 18,000 new mothers and babies had to be hospitalised in Gaza from acute malnutrition.
The genocide isn’t over. Israel may have slowed the rate of direct killings it is committing by bombing Gaza, but the indirect killings continue unabated. And so does the Israeli-engineered “debate” in the West, one designed to obscure and excuse the mass murder of Gaza’s population.
Israeli government officials, along with their state aligned partners, are commissioning the Sunday School literature, shaping the small-group curricula, and guiding the theological education of American evangelicals. Pastors are bribed, congregations are mapped, young believers are digitally targeted, and study materials are packaged as discipleship while promoting the interests of a foreign state. The American church has become a delivery system for narratives conceived in government offices overseas. What began as emotional support for Israel has evolved into a pipeline of influence that reaches straight into the pulpit and the classroom. The deepest scandal is simple. Evangelicals thought they were blessing Jews. Unbelieving Jews, instead, have been discipling them.
The Israeli government has spent years building this disciplined influence system that reaches from cabinet offices in Jerusalem to the Sunday school classrooms of the American church. From curated pastor tours to geofencing campaigns, it’s all because a foreign state has learned how to speak fluent evangelical. Sadly, key Christian leaders have become accomplices.
Ask a typical American evangelical why they support Israel and you will hear the same script every time. It is about the Bible. It is about blessing Abraham. It is about standing with the people of God. They imagine their loyalty rose naturally from their reading of Scripture and from a vague sense of shared morality. They picture it as a grassroots conviction, not as the end product of a coordinated program. In their minds there is no architect. There are only sincere believers, grateful Israelis, and a relationship that just happened.
What I’m about to reveal to you at Insight to Incite is that behind the sentimental language lies a set of institutions that treat evangelical support as a strategic asset. The Israeli state does not look at tens of millions of politically engaged Christians and see only prayer partners. It sees a voting bloc that can make or break policies in Washington. It sees donors, influencers, university boards, and megachurch networks that can normalize whatever Israel needs normalized in American life. They’ve built an influence infrastructure in America that’s astounding, once you see it.
It’s no surprise a foreign government wants to influence us. What’s so astounding is the way that planning reaches directly into American churches. The engine sits inside the government, not on the fringe. The messaging is not primarily run by romantic Christian tourists with a love for the Holy Land. It is guided by cabinet level offices, national ministries, and government aligned entities that track evangelical sentiment and adjust tactics when support starts to slip.
For years the church has been told to think about Israel in prophetic terms. What it has not been told is that Israel thinks about the church in strategic terms. That asymmetry is exactly what this series is meant to expose. To do that honestly, you cannot start with famous pastors or emotional trips to Jerusalem. You have to start at the top. I’ll put the words, names, and titles in bold that you need to remember.
Straight up ad hominem attack on a pioneer journalist producing better work than all of US Big Media combined.
Owens is establishing a new paradigm for journalism; one that draws on crowd-sourcing and direct feedback from the public.
Her podcast is booming because it’s very good and her audience can sense this is the right way to do news in today’s super-connected world.
She is a talented rhetorician to boot.
My guess is her main opponents savaging her are being paid, directly or indirectly, by the real perps; are part of the psyop themselves; are simply envious of her swift rise to global prominence due to her talent and content.
Rational and reasonable speculation is real content in the real-world in real-time.
Actively hunting for the truth is the most fundamental content everyone wants.
Candace has established a new formula, guys — crowd-sourcing, which yields tons of info and is deeply engaging; reasonable, focused content, including speculative content and queries; immediacy, authenticity and talent.
Since Kennedy’s piece is behind a paywall, I was not able to read it, but the headline, which itself is truly evil, is so bad I think it makes my fundamental point vividly:
No one else is producing bold, up-to-date content on Kirk’s murder, and that is what the public wants.
Not government, not Big Media, not TPUSA, not $7,000 podcasters.
Only Owens is doing the real work modern civilization deeply wants and requires. ABN
Erika Kirk has furiously slammed ‘evil’ conspiracy theorists making revolting claims linking Turning Point staff to Charlie Kirk‘s assassination.
The TPUSA CEO, who stepped into the role after her husband’s murder, warned that she would not allow her colleagues to be targeted by online trolls.
Inflammatory claims by provocateurs like Candace Owens have led to threats against TPUSA staff.
Owens, once a friend of Charlie Kirk’s, has told her followers that TPUSA is somehow to blame for his assassination – while carefully avoiding using Erika’s name.
Owens was a prominent TPUSA speaker and director of communications until 2020, when she parted ways amid disagreements.
Since Kirk’s death, she has escalated accusations of internal ‘betrayal’ at TPUSA, challenging the official narrative around the lone shooter and prompting TPUSA to invite her to a public livestream debate.
Erika, who did not name Owens specifically, told Fox News on Wednesday: ‘Come after me, call me names, I don’t care. Call me what you want, go down that rabbit hole, whatever.
‘But … when you go after the people that I love and you’re making hundreds of thousands of dollars every single episode going after the people that I love because somehow they’re in on this? No.’
I have avoided Erika Kirk’s role in the assassination investigation.
I remember saying only one thing about her, something kind about her words.
I am not going to change my tune except to say Kirk’s assassination belongs to the public now and TPUSA cannot be exempted from analysis because Erika says they are ‘family’.
The larger point is Owens has opened a novel avenue of investigation. She is doing incisive, transparent crowd-sourcing and speculative analysis.
Her work has been way better than the FBI’s.
I hope we see much more of this kind of real-time open discussion of major world events.
Everyone knows the government lies all the time and so does the press. ABN
American Buddhist Net 