A regime is not upheld by abstractions, but by men—by their capacities, their instincts, and their loyalties. Every political order is biopolitical. It rests on who is born, who holds power, and who is cast out.
Hierarchy is the principle by which men are arranged according to their natural differences. Order is the cohesion and stability that arise when those differences are rightly understood and affirmed. Both emerge from the unequal distribution of traits among men: differences in character, in foresight, and in the will to lead or the willingness to follow.
Institutions do not endure through ideals alone. They endure through the strength, discipline, and continuity of a people—through the cooperation of the living and the faithful transmission of order across generations. Each man fulfills the station assigned to him. As the Roman poet Horace observed, “Content with his own place, he does not strive to rise above his rank.” This is the foundation of every stable order.
When these biological foundations are subverted—when the weak and unfit are gathered into a collective and their infirmity is transmuted into political force—politics does not vanish. It degenerates. It no longer serves truth, justice, or excellence, but becomes a mechanism of control. The regime still demands obedience, but not from men of worth. It secures it through dependence, and sustains it by elevating the weak over the strong, the base over the noble.
This is the logic of Bioleninism.
Coined by the writer “Spandrell,” Bioleninism describes a strategy of rule that emerges in times of civilizational decline. Unable to sustain themselves through the loyalty of the competent and independent, regimes in decay assemble a new ruling coalition from the biologically—and therefore, often socially—unfit. These are not men who ascend through merit, but men whose status, and in many cases their very existence, depends entirely on the system. Their loyalty is secured through dependency. Their resentment is weaponized against those more capable.
This is not a new phenomenon. Lenin perfected it in revolutionary Russia. He recruited from the embittered margins—what Dr. Edward Dutton calls the “spiteful mutants”: ethnic outsiders, failed intellectuals, radical ideologues, and social deviants. These were not men with a stake in the old order, nor any place in a just or natural hierarchy. But for a regime built upon destruction, they were the perfect instruments. Their failure bound them in loyalty. Their hatred made them merciless.
Bioleninism adapts this same logic to the postmodern West. It extends beyond socioeconomic class to encompass the full spectrum of biological dysfunction. Its favored instruments are the neurotic, the perverse, the embittered, and the malformed. The more broken the individual, the more easily he is controlled. The less capable he is of surviving on merit, the more tightly he clings to the regime that elevates him. In this perverse selection process, the ugliness of ineptitude and failure becomes power. Dependence is transfigured into virtue.
This is not a regime designed to elevate the noble or reward the capable. It exists to entrench itself through the destruction of those who might transcend it. What it cannot corrupt, it casts out. What it cannot cast out, it slanders or crushes. Its war on merit is not accidental but essential, for excellence threatens its command. Competence defies control. Beauty reveals the sublime indifference of nature, where nothing is owed and everything must be earned. Normalcy resists authoritarian domination, for it thrives on proportion and restraint. And so inversion becomes the law. The strong are treated as a threat, the virtuous as a danger, the noble as criminal. In their place rise the bitter, the weak, and the grotesque—men who could never have built a civilization, but who will burn one down to preserve their power.
The result is a system that no longer aspires to greatness, but to obedience. Its rulers do not seek honor, but control. They govern not through excellence, but through fear, distortion, and manufactured dependency. Their stability rests on the loyalty of those who would hold no place in any just or well-ordered world.
Bioleninism is not a temporary error, but the death knell of a collapsing system. It does not merely manage decline, as the familiar idiom suggests, but voraciously feeds upon it. And unless it is utterly annihilated—without hesitation and without mercy—all that is noble will be shattered and all that is beautiful will lie in ruin.
Victory does not demand cruelty, but it does demand resolve, the kind that does not turn away from necessity. It calls for fidelity to nature, the courage to name things as they are, and the unbending will to build again. Like all parasitic systems, Bioleninism is brittle. Its strength lies not in might, but in submission. As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn warned, “Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.” If enough men refuse to live by lies, the mask cracks, the spell breaks, and the whole decrepit order begins to fall.
He gets it mostly right for the present and recent past but does not understand or acknowledge that the Arenda system in Poland and Eastern Europe (Poland was a much larger political region centuries ago) is what gave rise to the perception of Jews as despicable goblins.
The Arenda system was a leasing system which rewarded Jewish parasitism. The Polish, and other, ‘nobles’ who leased sale of liquor, tax collecting and other rights to Jews were every bit as much parasites as the Jews.
Jews flocked to Eastern Europe to cash in on the parasitic privileges they enjoyed under the Arenda System.
During those years, Jews experienced the largest population growth in world history, which is an indubitable indicator of wealth and an easy life.
At the same time, the peasantry they exploited were treated as slaves, because they were slaves.
The Khmelnytsky Uprising1, also known as the Cossack–Polish War, Khmelnytsky insurrection, Cossack Revolution, or, in Ukraine, as the National Liberation War was a response to many years of savage exploitation under the Arenda System.
The Uprising was directed at the entire Polish-Lithuanian ‘nobility’, Poles in general, Roman Catholics and Jews.
All of them were rightly perceived as parasitic oppressors. All of them were hated. And Jews who interfaced most closely with their peasant-slaves were perceived as greedy goblins. ABN
__________
This rabbi does history better, but likewise leaves out the Arenda System, which taught Jews how to control and exploit large numbers of slaves, entire populations, a skill they are still practicing today to the detriment of all others. ABN
Khmelnytsky Uprising The Khmelnytsky Uprising was a major rebellion that took place between 1648 and 1657 in the eastern territories of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, led by Cossack Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky. It began as a revolt by the Zaporozhian Cossacks but quickly evolved into a broader war of liberation involving the local Ukrainian peasantry and initially allied with the Crimean Tatars. The uprising was fueled by social discontent, religious tensions, and resentment toward Polish Catholic nobility (szlachta), particularly due to the imposition of Catholicism, Polonization, and the use of Jewish leaseholders (arendators) to manage estates. The rebellion resulted in significant violence and mass atrocities, especially against Polish and Jewish communities, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of casualties during the uprising and subsequent conflicts. The Cossacks targeted Roman Catholic and Ruthenian Uniate clergy, as well as Jewish populations, who were seen as representatives of the oppressive Polish administration. The event is known in Jewish history as one of the worst national catastrophes since the destruction of Solomon’s Temple. The uprising led to the creation of the Cossack Hetmanate, a new political entity in Ukraine, and marked the end of Polish Catholic noble control over Ukrainian Orthodox populations In 1654, the Pereiaslav Agreement was signed, leading to the incorporation of eastern Ukraine into the Tsardom of Russia, a development that had lasting implications for Ukraine’s relationship with both Poland and Russia. The conflict also contributed to the decline of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, a period known in Polish history as “The Deluge”. The uprising is considered a pivotal moment in Ukrainian history, symbolizing a national liberation struggle and influencing modern Ukrainian identity, though it remains a complex and contested event due to its violent legacy ↩︎
I so clearly remember having a conversation with Charlie about what was happening in Gaza which he obviously felt was morally wrong but also believed he could somehow broker peace between differing perspectives.
I told him to forget the politics— there are basic rules of the jungle; people that will mass murder innocent children and lie about it will murder us too. There’s no allying halfway with sheer evil.
It’s amazing that people don’t realize this and think America will somehow be kept safe if it keeps cheering on Israeli war crimes all around the world. As though that chicken won’t come home to roost.
Of course it will. As they have done many times in the past, Israel will murder Americans and our offspring too. We are dealing with a biblically murderous tribe that are not in any manner or form guided by Judaic belief.
Be sure to cheer this worldwide neocon shit on at your own peril.
Massive wildfires are tearing through Patagonia, displacing communities and destroying protected land. As the fires spread, local residents have begun reporting something unsettling: foreign individuals caught allegedly setting fires, with multiple reports pointing to Israelis.
Authorities say investigations are ongoing.
Patagonia is not just wilderness, it is one of the most resource-rich, sparsely populated regions on Earth:
• Freshwater reserves
• Fertile land
• Strategic geography
• Low population density
It is also a region that has long attracted foreign interest, legal and otherwise. This brings up a term many Argentines know well: Plan Andinia.
Plan Andinia refers to a mid-20th-century geopolitical concept, discussed in Argentine military and intelligence circles, proposing the establishment of a Jewish state or autonomous zone inPatagonia under certain conditions.
Whether speculative or strategic, it was real enough to be studied, debated, and feared. Plan Andinia was never implemented. But ideas do not need to be implemented to shape behavior. They need only to justify long-term positioning.
Land acquisition, NGO influence, tourism corridors, dual citizenship flows, security cooperation these are far more common tools than tanks.
Argentina’s south has seen:
• Large-scale foreign land purchases
• Restricted-access estates
• Private conservation zones with opaque governance
• Foreign security personnel operating under civilian cover
Wildfires introduce a new variable that Israelis will love…. forced displacement. Throughout history, environmental destruction has often preceded land reorganization.
Not because fires prove intent but because chaos creates opportunity:
• Emergency powers
• Property transfers
• International “assistance”
• Reframing of sovereignty as “management”
There are credible reports of Israelis caught setting fires on the hiking trails of Patagonia. In 2011, an Israeli was caught setting a fire that burned 17,000 acres of Chilean Patagonia.
When communities feel their land is being taken, reshaped, or destabilized without consent, they remember history.
Argentina has its own history with foreign interference, IMF restructuring, and externally imposed “solutions.” In that context, Patagonia is not peripheral. It is strategic. And Plan Andinia persists not as a plan, but as a symbol of vulnerability.
Wildfires should unite a country in defense of its land, not silence discussion.
History doesn’t repeat verbatim but it rhymes, especially when land is burning.
I have read that The land in question is legally protected and cannot be sold unless it is burned in a wildfire; then it can be sold and Milei is apparently doing just that. ABN
The American taxpayer just gave this organization a $10 million grant so it could fund messaging and goals like
“defending Jerusalem as the moral capital of the West”
And
“…the answer to this challenge is to believe again that being Jewish is the most important thing in the world… and that defending Jewish civilization is the only way to advance the cause of human liberty and human dignity…”
He is expressing clan and tribal values, much like the Somali clan & tribal values we are witnessing in the Minnesota scams.
USA and the West were built on a civilization that had ended clans, stopped them from perpetuating themselves through strict marriage laws against marrying near kin.
This fostered the high-trust (of strangers) that characterizes Western civilization.
This is also the reason Westerners have so much trouble understanding how and why clans and tribes work and why they almost always become parasitic in a high-trust society.
In a generous society such as USA and Europe, a parasitic clan will tend to hate the host and thus feel blissfully justified in scamming as much as they can while also destroying everything they touch.
A conspicuous exception to this rule are the Amish, who live by a moral and ethical code which prohibits parasitism and is highly respected by almost everyone who lives near them or knows anything about them.
Jews could easily earn immense respect from the entire world if they would kneel at the feet of the Amish and learn to behave more like them. ABN
The regulation of consanguineous marriages within the Catholic Church evolved over time, with early foundations rooted in classical Roman law, which already prohibited certain degrees of kinship for social and inheritance reasons. The Christianization of the West introduced theological dimensions to these laws, but the Church did not initially enforce strict prohibitions on cousin marriage. By the early 9th century, the Western Church had expanded the prohibited degrees of consanguinity from four to seven, adopting a new method of calculation that counted generations back to a common ancestor. This expansion marked a significant development in canon law, though it was not a single legislative act but a gradual process. The formal codification of these rules was further refined at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, which reduced the prohibited degrees from seven to four and established the method of calculating consanguinity still used today.
They clearly must have pulled this off with help from ‘lawmakers’ in USA. Maine has a very similar problem with per capita ramifications possibly even worse than Minnesota. Only the federal government can fix this. State voting scams and political and financial corruption are so tangled together, there are no state entities left to grapple with the problem. Maybe we can rely on the feds, if only because it will provide a way for them to look good while shifting public attention to the small potatoes of compromised states, away from themselves. ABN
Hatred of the host inspires and justifies vicious parasitism and cruelty. Freud was a fraud, an ‘intellectual’ subversive. He was describing Jewish Supremacy when he said a people can be cohesive as long as they have someone to hate. ABN
Sigmund Freud argued that social cohesion is fundamentally dependent on the existence of an external enemy or outgroup, which allows internal group members to unite through shared hostility. He posited that love within a group is only possible because of hatred directed toward those outside the group, as this external aggression serves to bind the group together. In his work, Freud explained that society coheres through the identification of an outgroup, enabling group members to displace their own aggressiveness onto this external target, thereby deflecting destructive impulses that might otherwise turn inward. This mechanism allows for the construction of group identity and cohesion, as the shared antagonism toward an “other” reinforces internal solidarity.
Sigmund Freud infamously said, “They don’t realize that we’re bringing them the plague,” upon arriving in New York Harbor in 1909 during his first and only visit to the United States.
Jewish Supremists have been doing this for centuries covertly. They make lists and hand them off to covert thugs who attack the people on the lists; and they often attack their children as well (see Gaza for evidence of this). This species of vigilantism is a major factor in the downfall of the West. Toadies are promoted (see US Congress for evidence of this), while talented people who can recognize patterns and are neither greedy nor afraid to speak are destroyed. Another point on those vigilante lists is any JS can put anyone on them. Dude scores a girl you want, put him on the list. Some guy in your class is smarter than you, put him on the list. This is always the deeply evil result of vigilante lists. The org in the video above is a public face, a sanitized version, of this ancient covert phenomenon. Even still it is chilling. Imagine anyone openly doing something like this to Jews. ABN
American Buddhist Net 