ONE: Incorporate Greenland and Canada into USA; form a strong collective alliance with Russia, Europe, Japan, Korea, and other Western-derived and northern nations. This will improve USA and the world immensely, while greatly reducing the chances of another major war. TWO: There is a reasonable possibility Trump will use the NSA database to map out all relationships between and among the very large parasite that has infested USA and the West. If he does that and uses those findings to extirpate that parasite with precision, USA and the West will be freed from the worst drain on their creativity and genius there has ever been. Both of these outcomes are possible. Trump seems to be aware of them and moving in a direction that can make them happen. The above describes probably the best practical outcome we can hope for on this planet. Add to it wise use of new technology, and a good future for the earth will be all but assured. ABN
The upside of them and Bondi is they will not undermine Trump as Bill Barr and Comey and others did. This alone will remove pressure on Trump, allowing him to move forward with more important business. ABN
WASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced it is ending collective bargaining for the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) Transportation Security Officers, which has constrained TSA’s chief mission: to safeguard our transportation systems and keep Americans safe.
Eliminating collective bargaining removes bureaucratic hurdles that will strengthen workforce agility enhance productivity and resiliency, while also jumpstarting innovation.
Making America’s Transportation Networks Resilient Again
Gaps in benefit programs, including non-verifiable Family and Medical Leave, are being exploited by a select few poor performers, placing greater burden on TSOs at the expense of American travelers and taxpayers.
This includes instances, where a TSO requested sick leave seven months in advance.
TSA has more people doing full-time union work than we have performing screening functions at 86% of our airports. Of the 432 federalized airports, 374 airports have fewer than 200 TSA Officers to preform screening functions.
Nearly 200 TSA Officers are paid by the government but work full-time on union matters. These people do not retain certification to perform screening functions. Additionally, in a recent TSA employee survey, over 60% said poor performers are allowed to stay employed and, not surprisingly, continue to not perform.
It doesn’t quite apex the previous selection of Nikki Haley in 2016 to deliver the State of the Union rebuttal targeting then candidate Donald Trump, however it does come close.
The seven ways from Sunday group have this year selected Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin to deliver the State of the Union rebuttal to President Donald Trump. Slotkin is a CIA operative shifted into congress.
In the CIA’s need to oppose President Trump, they are getting a little sloppy with the transparency of their agenda.
In semi-related news…. Dan Bongino will soon discover for himself, the FBI runs two basic operations as part of their modern mission. Proactive, and Reactive operations.
Operation #1 is best defined as the “proactive mission.” Essentially the autonomic operational objective of the silo as it is administered. This is the resting compass heading of the organization; it’s functional position in statis.
The ‘proactive mission’ is to defend the interests of the DC system of government. The FBI monitors threats to government interests and takes action based on threats to the framework of DC governance.
Operation #2 is best considered the “reactive mission,” where the FBI is forced into investigative footing as an outcome of something that happens.
The ‘reactive mission’ runs first and foremost through the prism of the ‘proactive’ responsibility. The reactive investigative footing is the full deployment of resources to identify if the event presents the possibility of risk to the DC system.
Example of #2, a terror event is a “reactive” focus. The FBI is reacting to something, investigating some event that has already occurred. Often the reactive investigation runs across the proactive activity, and we discover a “known wolfe” who was not a proactive priority, because the threat was not to DC or Govt., specifically. Another example the NASCAR noose nonsense.
Example of #1, the Hunter Biden laptop, Ashley Biden diary, Awan Brothers, Clinton email server etc., these are all considered ‘threats’ to the DC/Govt system, and therefore they gain the full attention of the “Proactive Mission.”
Understanding the FBI is a matter of understanding the priority of the organization is defending the interests of DC/Govt as the primary objective, the Proactive Operation, the standard setting.
The Reactive Operation is considerably less important and encompasses the after-action Homeland Security mission.
The FBI is a sub-silo of the much more significant Parent silo, the CIA.
It is the CIA who controls the operational mission focus of the FBI.
If women were in charge of most states, the world would not last long. Women are too volatile, too personal and emotional ——- exactly the qualities that make for bad diplomacy.
This trait is exacerbated in a Western world committed to liberalism in geopolitics, rather than realism.
Liberalism seeks to “fight the last war” to make the world safe for democracy” —- whereas realism, a manly perspective, accepts the realities of great power politics and the balance of power doctrine.
It understands that bigger nations get to have more privileges than small nations, and that there is no such thing as equality of rights in international relations.
He may be right. I take the male-female differences as about 15% on either side for many determinations of this sort. It is decidedly true that world history is filled with bad leaders. And it is also true today that there are few if any really good female leaders in anything. When they gang up and form gynogangs, as they have done in American universities and the EU, the results are worse than death: stifling low-brow ‘ideological thinking’ so bad it appears designed to turn away best minds. Plenty of men participate in nonsense like the above but that’s where the 15% comes in. Duchesne frequently makes the point that Western liberalism—which sees all human beings as equal and the same—is a dagger in the brain of the West. If we do not adapt to reality soon, and the odds are not good, we are done for as a people. White Western people will disappear from the earth due to their failure to protect themselves against their own ingrained ideals and the parasites who have learned to exploit those ideals. Frederiksen is a clueless fool to talk like that and she is not the only one who is doing it. ABN
American Buddhist Net 