Tag: politics
🔴 LIVE: Arizona State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election
DECLARATION OF DR. NAVID KESHAVARZ-NIA on election fraud
…I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred to Vice President Biden. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.
EXECUTED ON: November 25, 2020 By: Navid Keshavarz-Nia, Ph.D., Ed.D
The above quote is from the conclusion. The entire declaration is well worth reading. It’s nine pages and can be found here.
Johns Hopkins Study shows COVID-19 has had ‘Relatively No Effect on Deaths’
Johns Hopkins deleted the study, which you can find below, not because it is wrong but because it “…was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic.“
The following image provides the gist of the study:
The study itself and more information about it can be found here: According to study, “in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
EDIT 12/21/20: The study has been memory-holed. An archived copy can be found here: A closer look at U.S. deaths due to COVID-19.
🔴 LIVE: Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Election
I watched almost all of this hearing and believe it is worth the time spent. The core issue, of course, is honest elections; provably honest elections. It does not look like this one was.
Witnesses at different levels in the election hierarchy testify to having witnessed serious fraud or glaring statistical anomalies. You can click almost anywhere in the video and find someone saying something interesting. ABN
Good overview of how election fraud may be resolved
Trump legal team details election fraud of unprecedented proportions
Begins at 58:30, prompted:
Public language has problems similar to private language
Private language—what we say to ourselves, how we cogitate while alone—is greatly dependent on public language, that which is readily understood by many.
In fact, private language is so dependent on public language, it can be argued that a private language completely divorced from public language cannot exist.
It is obvious that anyone wanting to influence or control large numbers of people will address them in public language.
It is less obvious, that those same people frequently will also seek to change the public language itself.
Sometimes this language changing is a good thing as that is how civilizations adapt and grow. It is probably best, or usually best, when civilizational changes arise organically from the whole society or from important parts of society that are behaving honestly.
Sometimes, however, the changing of public language is done dishonestly by small numbers of people who have seized positions of power, sometimes precisely for that purpose.
They change public language to further their positions, ideas, or programs; to seize control of public topics; to seize or secure power over the public.
It is not as easy to parse this as it may seem. Who is restricting honest organic input into public language? Or when is organic input into public language itself but a ruse to falsely commandeer that language?
After Lenin and Stalin seized control of the public languages of the Soviet Union, we can see a clear-cut example of bad actors creating a basis for indoctrination. Before they seized power, we can see an example of a dishonest “organic” group seeking to commandeer control of public language.
And how do we see that today, through the lens of “history”?
Firstly, whose history? The same problem with public language arises.
Secondly, maybe we can never know. Maybe only societal laws or rules of governance can help us determine what’s right or best. But then the same problem arises.
Whose laws, whose rules?
In this sense both public and private languages have enormous problems basing themselves on anything.
___________________
first posted OCTOBER 11, 2019
Greenwald on USA mass media
“It is indeed a very foul mess… and I am going to expose every one of them”: Sidney Powell on election FRAUD
Strongest words thus far on what a majority of Americans now realize was criminal election fraud; a conspiracy to steal massive numbers of votes and overthrow the US federal government.
Lin Wood tells it like it is
Wood speaks from minute 32-44, prompted>
Rudy Giuliani provides detailed update on critical vote fraud cases
Unique American voices: USPS whistleblower Richard Hopkins interviewed by federal postal agents
I am posting this because the interview is controversial and does appear to be coercive in the sense that the agents want Hopkins to recant or downplay his original testimony.
I posted this video yesterday and then took it down after watching more of it because it’s long and probably not going to have much bearing on the election. Reposting this morning under the tag “unique voices” because the video does reveal how an interview with potential national repercussions can be conducted.
Here is a Twitter thread that has a good discussion in more detail:
Whistleblower details election fraud in Detroit; former Dominion employee describes a sh**show
I find this testimony credible and well-worth viewing. ~President-elect of USA ABN
Benford’s Law indicates vote fraud
Linked below is a very good explanation of Benford’s Law and how it exposes fraudulent election tallies. The video included in the link makes Benford’s Law crystal clear.
By applying the Benford Law test to the leading digit of the vote totals reported from precincts, The Biden totals fail the test. (Showing manipulation) While the Trump numbers pass. (Showing expected distribution)
Apparently, Wikipedia has already altered its page on Benford to skew how we understand it
American Buddhist Net 