Official claim that Putin “aspired” to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even “ridiculous,” according to long-suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard
The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “developed a clear preference” for Donald Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory” is revealed in a report released this morning by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to have been based on four pieces of evidence. One was the Steele Dossier. The surprise is that the other three were even less credible, each included over objections of the report’s CIA authors.
The first item was a “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment” of one sentence that the report’s five CIA authors read “five ways” and initially left out, only to have Director John Brennan order it back in. The second item was an email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification.” The third was supposedly backed by “liaison,” diplomatic, and press reporting, as well as signals intelligence (SIGINT), except the “SIGINT” didn’t mention Trump, the “liaison reporting” didn’t mention Trump and was from 2014, and the “diplomatic and media” reporting was a post-election review by a U.S. Ambassador citing a Russian pundit who said Putin and Trump should “work together like businessmen.” This was “evidence” that Putin “developed a clear preference” for Trump.
All three reports weren’t just unsourced and unreliable, but discarded fictions pulled out of the CIA’s trash heap. “They manipulated the manipulations,” is how ODNI Deputy Chief of Staff Alexa Henning put it.
The Russia Hoax ‘collusion delusion’ was exposed a long time ago, but now is supported by more evidence based on IC documents and the imprimatur of the DNI, Tulsi Gabbard.
This is potentially the biggest case in American political history.
My understanding is this ‘treasonous conspiracy’ does not end with these four pieces of evidence. It is going to extend to the even more serious 2020 election theft and beyond. ABN
Main Justice has announced the formation of a DOJ strike force to assemble and assess the evidence provided by Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, against former intelligence and government officials.
This will require the DOJ to take a new approach, extracting information from multiple silos and then overlaying context to the content therein.
That’s essentially the new approach that DNI Gabbard has taken to break down the silo defenses, and this is the first time since I’ve been outlining how they self-protect that someone (DNI) has actually done the extracting and cross-referencing.
Dept of Justice – WASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Justice announced the formation of a Strike Force to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and investigate potential next legal steps which might stem from DNI Gabbard’s disclosures.
This Department takes alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with the utmost seriousness.
Upon the formation of the Strike Force, Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated:
“The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.” (LINK)
Don’t underestimate how radical and challenging this type of an approach is going to be.
OIG Michael Horowitz never could attempt it (not authorized), SC John Durham was not permitted to do it (not authorized); the House Select Sub-Committee on Govt Weaponization ran away with hair on fire at even the suggestion of doing it (ask me how I know), and no modern internal investigative unit has ever been allowed to extract national security information from multiple IC institutions, and review it in context.
The DC intel silos are built so their lack of sharing creates a natural defense mechanism; there is no cross-reference capability. DNI Tulsi Gabbard has the unique ability -due to her position- of reaching into each IC silo regardless of their effort to stop her. That’s what has led to this point.
If the DOJ is successful, things could change; but that’s a very big ‘if’.
The entire mechanism of the USIC, led by defenses from the Senate Intel Committee (Cotton), will do everything to stop any internal extraction and review of their silo information. “National security” claims will run rampant. This will be a heavy lift requiring Executive Office support and coordination at every level.
Many of us knew about everything she said long ago, some of it almost at the time it happened (or before in many cases, because it was obvious a special prosecutor would be the best way to derail Trump, for example).
The question now is will Bondi do her job.
I am seeing a general consensus among conspiracy theorists that Bondi probably will not do much if anything. I’d rather not predict.
This could become the most significant court case in US history. The crime is treason.
Though many of us have known about this for a long time, there are still many tens of millions of Americans who believed the other side.
The effect of this material on them will be the most important outcome of whatever happens going forward.
Whether perps are convicted of treason or their crimes are merely made public for all to see, and cannot be denied, USA will never be the same again in a good way.
These crimes against Trump and USA reveal the true, raw nature of American political power.
And that brings us very close to discovering who is really in control of USA. ABN
…Consider the following regarding the absurdity and cruelty of Holocaust Denial laws. At the post-WWII Nuremberg Trials, the Soviet delegation was led by Andrey Vyshinsky, the same judge who oversaw Stalin’s bogus ‘Show Trials’ (1936-1938) where defendants, including Lenin’s close friends (Kamenev, Zinoviev, Bukharin and more), were tortured into confessing their guilt, and were then executed.
At the Nuremberg Trials, Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced “evidence” blaming the Germans for the massacre of 20,000+ leading Poles near Katyn and elsewhere, which many at the time, including Churchill, knew had been done by Stalin.
Vyshinsky’s legal team introduced obviously fabricated “evidence,” which can be easily verified in the official trial documentation, and has been gathered by Carlos Porter in his book Made In Russia: The Holocaust.
During that trial, the Soviets claimed that the evil non-homo sapiens maniacal Hitler-Nazis killed people via steam chambers, electrical chambers, atomic bomb-like device, having people climb trees and then cutting them down, a pedal-driven brain bashing machine, and a bone-grinding machine among other absurd-fabricated methods.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s, the total number of people estimated by the “official” coerced-competition-immune narrative to have been killed in Auschwitz was revised from 4 million to 1.5 million, and soon after to 1.1 million.
All alleged extermination camps have experienced similar large downward revisions. Given the above, and prior to these massive “revisions,” someone doing their moral duty of speaking the truth as they saw it, saying that the 4 million figure was a gross exaggeration, or error, or Soviet-Communist fabrication by Stalin’s legal team at the post-World-War-Two Nuremberg Trials to punish the Germans, would have been erroneously, unjustly vilified, sent to prison, or killed for resisting arrest.
…Jewish Supremists, duh. Obviously he knows this. The Overton Toilet is so full it’s overflowing. Tucker has a strong hand but also can read the bathroom. ABN
From what I can see, there were 3 separate signatures used with the Joe Biden Autopen during his tenure, but again, none were his established signature. However, the live signature on Joe’s resignation letter on July 21, 2024, when he dropped out of the campaign, is authentic in my opinion. So is his signature on his pardon for Hunter Biden, even though he was shaky with that one and messed up his B, but it is still consistent with his established signature, not Jill’s.
If you will study the information I sent to The Gateway Pundit back in January 2021, [see the link above] you will see what I am talking about.
The concise point here is: it appears Joe Biden had a consistent signature before he was President, then different ones during his presidency, and then reverted back to his original signature when he resigned and signed Hunter’s pardon. That never happens in my experience.
Facsimile laws do not allow for a forged signature to bind a legal document. That is the issue here and while the Autopen alone is a big thing and worth prying into insofar as who was controlling it, the larger issue is it was never legitimate with the signature of Joe Biden, but a forgery.
American Buddhist Net 