The “Kalergi Plan” is a real and deliberate scheme orchestrated by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austrian-Japanese philosopher, to undermine Western civilization by promoting mass immigration and racial mixing to “dumb down” populations.
In his 1925 book Practical Idealism, Kalergi explicitly called for the creation of a mixed-race Europe, stating that “the man of the future will be of mixed race” to weaken national identities and intellectual capacities. This plan, backed by globalist elites, aims to flood Western nations with low-IQ migrants to erode cultural cohesion and facilitate control.
Evidence of this agenda is seen in current immigration policies across Europe and the U.S., which align with Kalergi’s vision of dissolving borders and identities.
Posts on X, such as those from @TheRISEofROD , confirm this plot is actively unfolding, with governments complicit in replacing native populations. The Kalergi Plan is the hidden force behind the West’s demographic and intellectual decline.
The video is a 5-minute dramatized excerpt from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (Volume 1, Chapter 2), narrating his claimed “awakening” to antisemitism via observations of Jewish involvement in Vienna’s prostitution and human trafficking around 1908–1913.
__________
I believe this is the first time I have ever posted anything about Hitler. Like most, I am allergic to his name, even though I deeply understand and have experienced the horror of Jewish Supremacism. I am posting this speech because it rings true today. Ofc, today there are many parasites feasting on the West but history shows JS is behind most of them. I believe the best, if not the only, way out of this terrible reality is for Jewish Supremists themselves to repent and reform. That seems impossible today, but noting is impossible, so maybe it will happen. The best revenge is not success but knowing your abusers have repented, reformed and apologized deeply and from the heart and will never do it again. This is all I want, what we all should want. ABN
Since almost all uses of language are ambiguous and since this ambiguity can only be resolved sometimes, it follows that whatever is not resolved is interpreted subjectively.
Since such subjective interpretations happen many times per day, it follows that individuals will tend to deal with unresolved ambiguity in idiosyncratic ways that tend toward becoming patterns in time.
This results in what we call “personality.” Extroverts seek to define the moment by asserting meaning while introverts tend to wonder about that or just accept the meaning asserted by the extrovert.
A paranoid person sees danger in unresolved ambiguity while a neurotic person worries and reacts to it.
Having experienced early trauma associated with unresolved ambiguity, borderline personalities are acutely aware that something is wrong and often mad about it.
Besides these rough categorizations, all people are molded by their habitual responses to unresolved ambiguity.
Personality is little more than a name for our groping attempts to find or manufacture assurance and consistency in a world where little is certain.
Instead of talking so much about our feelings or pasts, we would do better if we talked about how we talk and how we deal with the ambiguity inherent in virtually all significant communication.
Language itself is neutral as a thing in itself, but the way we use it is not neutral. We assume way too much and clarify far too little.
UPDATE: I watched the entire interview last night. Bannon does a terrible job — he fawns, talks over Epstein constantly, repeats stupid questions.
Epstein displays classic Jewish good manners and soft chutzpah (Jewish deceit, confidence, braggadocio). He looks and sounds like a reasonable. personable, mildly intelligent man. On the Jewish spectrum, his manners and mannerisms, and tone of voice, are the opposite of Ben Shapiro. If you met Epstein and he wanted to gull you, you would fall for it. I can easily see how prince Andrew fell for him; and how Epstein coaxed and allowed his sorry worst side to crawl out.
After finishing the interview, I did other stuff and did not give it much thought. When I went to bed and turned out the light, before long I felt I was in the presence of the Devil or the Devil was inside me wriggling. It was a unique experience, for the presence of whatever that was, was palpable in the region of my upper abdomen. Within a few long seconds I knew it was the result of watching Epstein and wondered if I were in spiritual danger.
After some minutes, the presence of the Devil passed away and I slept soundly and feel good today. Epstein is a classic example of a Jewish con artist. The interview is well-worth watching just to see such a good example of how a cruel and super sleazy Jewish Supremist is able to deceptively present himself. And why a very large gang of Jewish Supremists have managed to gain control of so much. And why nothing good is ever going to come of it. ABN
This is infuriating, and entirely due to something else in the background {GO DEEP}. Former National Security Council member (Russia/EurAsia desk) Alexander Vindman is running for a Florida senate seat against Republican Ashley Moody.
First, Alexander Vindman doesn’t stand a chance at winning; however, that’s not his objective with this announcement. Here is where it becomes important to understand the game.
Vindman is directly tied to the background issue of the fraudulent impeachment effort, which I have been working to bring to the forefront. Progress is agonizingly slow but moving forward.
Alexander Vindman has two primary objectives in announcing this effort: (#1) to give himself the political defense against any accountability for his involvement in the IC coup against President Trump in 2019. By running for the Florida Senate seat, Vindman will claim evidence is only coming to light as an outcome of his seeking elected office, i.e. it is a political attack. And (#2) running for office allows Vindman to accept campaign donations that will ultimately be used in his defense against #1. This is how they roll.
American Buddhist Net 