This demonstration of solemn obeisance, couched in religious language and purported visionary experience, is a requirement for America’s upper-middle-tier elite. This keeps the redirected tax dollars flowing and the congratulatory bots humming. Not saying Beck is doing this, but for Americans at his level, fake piety and unChristian, irreligious allegiance to Jewish Supremacy is a sine qua non of elite membership. ABN
FIML practice changes your personality, your sense of yourself, because the basis of who you tell yourself you are changes. It changes from a more or less set story or static ideal of an elusive ‘me’ to an active function.
This happens because when you do FIML you interact with your partner on a dynamic, experiential basis. This basis is guided by a mutual agreement which admits far more objective data into your core self-assessments than is possible without FIML.
FIML teaches both partners the value of micromanaging their communication and being completely honest about every moment of communication, every ‘psychological morpheme’ that transits between them.
FIML practice changes your sense of group allegiance by gradually allowing partners to shift their sense of allegiance away from the static ideals of an external group to the dynamic, and deeply truthful experiences discovered through FIML practice,.
For example, if both partners are Buddhists, they will be able to gradually shift their understanding of the Dharma away from static, imitative notions of how to be, to much richer insights based on their honest interactive experiences.
They will grow away from reliance on two-dimensional ideals toward a mutually understood, multidimensional experience of Buddhist truths.
There is nothing wrong with ideals at the right place and time, but individual Buddhists must advance beyond merely acting them out, pretending they feel ways they don’t. The core of the mind is accessed in FIML practice because FIML accesses core communication processes. An individual all alone can gain many insights, but without the help of a FIML partner how can they check their insights?
Buddhists who practice FIML will find their practice informed by Buddhism at almost every turn, but this is different from modelling a static personality on static Buddhist ideals. It is so radically different, I suspect it is much closer to what the Buddha actually meant and probably a major reason monks traveled in pairs for most of the year. How can you know yourself, your being, your reality, if you aren’t sure of what people are saying to you or how they are hearing you? Not only not sure, but wrong much of the time? The answer is you cannot. It’s not possible.
FIML will wake you and your partner from that aspect of the dream. As the Diamond Sutra says:
All conditioned things are like dreams, like illusions, like bubbles, like shadows, like dew, like lightning, and all of them should be contemplated in this way
Psychology recapitulates sociology and vice versa. Groups of people when they are bound by static ideals/beliefs can be worse than individuals. Bad groups—and there are many of them—act like psychopaths.
Individuals within such groups may be ‘nice’ to other group members, but the group itself rarely will eschew all ‘callous disregard’ for other groups, the very definition of a psychopath. Even Buddhist groups can become like this.
The only ones that don’t are so small and weak, they dare not.
This is true of all groups, not just religious ones. National, ethnic, gender-based, racial, political, whatever; virtually all groups are based on static ideals and stories, which when internalized, reduce the functionality of the individual and corrupt their morality and capacity for deep insight, original being.
Science in many ways is an exception because as a group ‘science’ is objective, rational, parsimonious, evidence-based. In practice of course, the sociology of how science is actually done can be fraught with delusion. Science works very well at a high level of abstraction, but many individual scientists will feel low-grade sociological pressures and many of them will belong to groups that are based on ideals that are very different from science and that are sociopathic.
Yes, I believe all large groups are dangerous and will lead individuals to make serious ethical mistakes. And yet, we have to belong somewhere. It is difficult to be all alone. This is where FIML can help greatly. You can fulfill many of your group needs by making your FIML partner your core group.
FIML partners should continue being deeply informed by other groups—science, Buddhism, good politics, your friends and neighbors, wholesome religious beliefs, etc.—but they should not take in the sociopathic ideals of those groups.
Go to your temples, enjoy them, do the meditations, participate, but don’t be a robot. With the help of your partner, you will be able to separate out the dreams, illusions, shadows, and lightning of the Dharma from the profound reality of your actual lives as you are actually living them. You will discover, with the help of the Dharma, the suchness of your actual being, not someone else’s.
The “Kalergi Plan” is a real and deliberate scheme orchestrated by Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austrian-Japanese philosopher, to undermine Western civilization by promoting mass immigration and racial mixing to “dumb down” populations.
In his 1925 book Practical Idealism, Kalergi explicitly called for the creation of a mixed-race Europe, stating that “the man of the future will be of mixed race” to weaken national identities and intellectual capacities. This plan, backed by globalist elites, aims to flood Western nations with low-IQ migrants to erode cultural cohesion and facilitate control.
Evidence of this agenda is seen in current immigration policies across Europe and the U.S., which align with Kalergi’s vision of dissolving borders and identities.
Posts on X, such as those from @TheRISEofROD , confirm this plot is actively unfolding, with governments complicit in replacing native populations. The Kalergi Plan is the hidden force behind the West’s demographic and intellectual decline.
The video is a 5-minute dramatized excerpt from Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf (Volume 1, Chapter 2), narrating his claimed “awakening” to antisemitism via observations of Jewish involvement in Vienna’s prostitution and human trafficking around 1908–1913.
__________
I believe this is the first time I have ever posted anything about Hitler. Like most, I am allergic to his name, even though I deeply understand and have experienced the horror of Jewish Supremacism. I am posting this speech because it rings true today. Ofc, today there are many parasites feasting on the West but history shows JS is behind most of them. I believe the best, if not the only, way out of this terrible reality is for Jewish Supremists themselves to repent and reform. That seems impossible today, but noting is impossible, so maybe it will happen. The best revenge is not success but knowing your abusers have repented, reformed and apologized deeply and from the heart and will never do it again. This is all I want, what we all should want. ABN
Since almost all uses of language are ambiguous and since this ambiguity can only be resolved sometimes, it follows that whatever is not resolved is interpreted subjectively.
Since such subjective interpretations happen many times per day, it follows that individuals will tend to deal with unresolved ambiguity in idiosyncratic ways that tend toward becoming patterns in time.
This results in what we call “personality.” Extroverts seek to define the moment by asserting meaning while introverts tend to wonder about that or just accept the meaning asserted by the extrovert.
A paranoid person sees danger in unresolved ambiguity while a neurotic person worries and reacts to it.
Having experienced early trauma associated with unresolved ambiguity, borderline personalities are acutely aware that something is wrong and often mad about it.
Besides these rough categorizations, all people are molded by their habitual responses to unresolved ambiguity.
Personality is little more than a name for our groping attempts to find or manufacture assurance and consistency in a world where little is certain.
Instead of talking so much about our feelings or pasts, we would do better if we talked about how we talk and how we deal with the ambiguity inherent in virtually all significant communication.
Language itself is neutral as a thing in itself, but the way we use it is not neutral. We assume way too much and clarify far too little.
UPDATE: I watched the entire interview last night. Bannon does a terrible job — he fawns, talks over Epstein constantly, repeats stupid questions.
Epstein displays classic Jewish good manners and soft chutzpah (Jewish deceit, confidence, braggadocio). He looks and sounds like a reasonable. personable, mildly intelligent man. On the Jewish spectrum, his manners and mannerisms, and tone of voice, are the opposite of Ben Shapiro. If you met Epstein and he wanted to gull you, you would fall for it. I can easily see how prince Andrew fell for him; and how Epstein coaxed and allowed his sorry worst side to crawl out.
After finishing the interview, I did other stuff and did not give it much thought. When I went to bed and turned out the light, before long I felt I was in the presence of the Devil or the Devil was inside me wriggling. It was a unique experience, for the presence of whatever that was, was palpable in the region of my upper abdomen. Within a few long seconds I knew it was the result of watching Epstein and wondered if I were in spiritual danger.
After some minutes, the presence of the Devil passed away and I slept soundly and feel good today. Epstein is a classic example of a Jewish con artist. The interview is well-worth watching just to see such a good example of how a cruel and super sleazy Jewish Supremist is able to deceptively present himself. And why a very large gang of Jewish Supremists have managed to gain control of so much. And why nothing good is ever going to come of it. ABN
American Buddhist Net 