Raw mind-control. The good side of this campaign is it reveals who the sellouts are. Once identified, they should not be believed or have appreciable influence any longer.
At the end of the day, none of this is good for Israel or Jews, or America. ABN
He gets it mostly right for the present and recent past but does not understand or acknowledge that the Arenda system in Poland and Eastern Europe (Poland was a much larger political region centuries ago) is what gave rise to the perception of Jews as despicable goblins.
The Arenda system was a leasing system which rewarded Jewish parasitism. The Polish, and other, ‘nobles’ who leased sale of liquor, tax collecting and other rights to Jews were every bit as much parasites as the Jews.
Jews flocked to Eastern Europe to cash in on the parasitic privileges they enjoyed under the Arenda System.
During those years, Jews experienced the largest population growth in world history, which is an indubitable indicator of wealth and an easy life.
At the same time, the peasantry they exploited were treated as slaves, because they were slaves.
The Khmelnytsky Uprising1, also known as the Cossack–Polish War, Khmelnytsky insurrection, Cossack Revolution, or, in Ukraine, as the National Liberation War was a response to many years of savage exploitation under the Arenda System.
The Uprising was directed at the entire Polish-Lithuanian ‘nobility’, Poles in general, Roman Catholics and Jews.
All of them were rightly perceived as parasitic oppressors. All of them were hated. And Jews who interfaced most closely with their peasant-slaves were perceived as greedy goblins. ABN
__________
This rabbi does history better, but likewise leaves out the Arenda System, which taught Jews how to control and exploit large numbers of slaves, entire populations, a skill they are still practicing today to the detriment of all others. ABN
Khmelnytsky Uprising The Khmelnytsky Uprising was a major rebellion that took place between 1648 and 1657 in the eastern territories of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, led by Cossack Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky. It began as a revolt by the Zaporozhian Cossacks but quickly evolved into a broader war of liberation involving the local Ukrainian peasantry and initially allied with the Crimean Tatars. The uprising was fueled by social discontent, religious tensions, and resentment toward Polish Catholic nobility (szlachta), particularly due to the imposition of Catholicism, Polonization, and the use of Jewish leaseholders (arendators) to manage estates. The rebellion resulted in significant violence and mass atrocities, especially against Polish and Jewish communities, with estimates of hundreds of thousands of casualties during the uprising and subsequent conflicts. The Cossacks targeted Roman Catholic and Ruthenian Uniate clergy, as well as Jewish populations, who were seen as representatives of the oppressive Polish administration. The event is known in Jewish history as one of the worst national catastrophes since the destruction of Solomon’s Temple. The uprising led to the creation of the Cossack Hetmanate, a new political entity in Ukraine, and marked the end of Polish Catholic noble control over Ukrainian Orthodox populations In 1654, the Pereiaslav Agreement was signed, leading to the incorporation of eastern Ukraine into the Tsardom of Russia, a development that had lasting implications for Ukraine’s relationship with both Poland and Russia. The conflict also contributed to the decline of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, a period known in Polish history as “The Deluge”. The uprising is considered a pivotal moment in Ukrainian history, symbolizing a national liberation struggle and influencing modern Ukrainian identity, though it remains a complex and contested event due to its violent legacy ↩︎
UPDATE: A communist in today’s America, today’s world, is a total fool, or an incorrigible greedy crook.
The much wiser path toward some sort of more equitable social good is to wait for technology to be advanced enough to replace some of the more vicious aspects of capitalism, while also multiplying global total wealth by several orders of magnitude.
The day may come soon when the world enjoys so much material wealth, there will be no need to fight over it.
The other possibility is tech will become so powerful, we all become slaves, a state which basically = a communist dictatorship. ABN
UPDATE 2: Turns out she is Jewish. Her talk indicates Jewish Supremacy. Cannot be emphasized enough that hating the host population (White, in this case) and the nation they built is a sure sign of parasitism. JS is a parasitic group with a long history of hatred and violence against Whites. ABN
This is true and one of the main reasons students of any age do much better when in classes with classmates who are all at roughly the same level and are being taught by teachers who understand this.
This principle need have nothing to do with race.
It is basic pedagogy, and can be extrapolated to many other situations — employment, clubs, social circles, immigration, neighborhoods, and yes, also race and cultural background.
This is the main reason DEI is always guaranteed to fail.
The leftist craze to ‘end Whiteness’ is based on degrading Whites by forcing them to learn and work among people who are not at their level, culturally, morally or intellectually.
Civilizations progress only when the most talented people rise to the top, not the most pathological and self-aggrandizing ones. ABN
This appears to be the voice of Jewish Supremacy and Jewish Big Money scrambling to end free-speech rights in USA. JS has already succeed in criminalizing speech in the EU and other Western regions, but USA has the First Amendment, which so far is holding up sort of OK. Censorship is always used to hide truth and control populations. There is never a good reason to censor speech. ABN
__________
_________
Jefferson’s 1823 letter to John Adams authenticates the quote as part of a broader deist analysis of religions, describing Jewish ideas of God as “degrading and injurious” while contrasting them with rational ethics.
The American taxpayer just gave this organization a $10 million grant so it could fund messaging and goals like
“defending Jerusalem as the moral capital of the West”
And
“…the answer to this challenge is to believe again that being Jewish is the most important thing in the world… and that defending Jewish civilization is the only way to advance the cause of human liberty and human dignity…”
He is expressing clan and tribal values, much like the Somali clan & tribal values we are witnessing in the Minnesota scams.
USA and the West were built on a civilization that had ended clans, stopped them from perpetuating themselves through strict marriage laws against marrying near kin.
This fostered the high-trust (of strangers) that characterizes Western civilization.
This is also the reason Westerners have so much trouble understanding how and why clans and tribes work and why they almost always become parasitic in a high-trust society.
In a generous society such as USA and Europe, a parasitic clan will tend to hate the host and thus feel blissfully justified in scamming as much as they can while also destroying everything they touch.
A conspicuous exception to this rule are the Amish, who live by a moral and ethical code which prohibits parasitism and is highly respected by almost everyone who lives near them or knows anything about them.
Jews could easily earn immense respect from the entire world if they would kneel at the feet of the Amish and learn to behave more like them. ABN
The regulation of consanguineous marriages within the Catholic Church evolved over time, with early foundations rooted in classical Roman law, which already prohibited certain degrees of kinship for social and inheritance reasons. The Christianization of the West introduced theological dimensions to these laws, but the Church did not initially enforce strict prohibitions on cousin marriage. By the early 9th century, the Western Church had expanded the prohibited degrees of consanguinity from four to seven, adopting a new method of calculation that counted generations back to a common ancestor. This expansion marked a significant development in canon law, though it was not a single legislative act but a gradual process. The formal codification of these rules was further refined at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, which reduced the prohibited degrees from seven to four and established the method of calculating consanguinity still used today.
Besides Minnesota and Ohio, the same thing has been happening in Maine, ruining the state in just a few years. Importing fake refugees costs states targeted by this strategy a fortune while completely undermining the political will of their citizens. The invasion of Maine may appear small to outsiders, but the population of Maine is a mere 1.3 million, so per capita it is as bad or worse than Minnesota. ABN
Starmer’s government has set the most dangerous of precedents: it can now outlaw any political group it chooses as a terrorist organisation – and thereby make it impossible to defend it
The moment the British government began proscribing political movements as terrorist organisations, rather than just militant groups, it was inevitable that saying factual things, making truthful statements, would become a crime.
And lo behold, here we are.
The Terrorism Act 2000 has a series of provisions that make it difficult to voice or show any kind of support for an organisation proscribed under the legislation, whether it is writing an article or wearing a T-shirt.
Recent attention has focused on Section 13, which is being used to hound thousands of mostly elderly people who have held signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.” They now face a terrorism conviction and up to six months in jail.
But an amendment introduced in 2019 to Section 12 of the Act has been largely overlooked, even though it is even more repressive. It makes it a terrorism offence for a person to express “an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation” and in doing so be “reckless” about whether anyone else might be “encouraged to support” the organisation.
It is hard to believe this clause was not inserted specifically to target the watchdog professions: journalists, human rights groups and lawyers. They now face up to 14 years in jail for contravening this provision.