UPDATE: Candace is at her best when she is angry for a good reason. Just my personal opinion, but she has a deeply female way of thinking and expressing herself, on top of which she also has high intelligence and rhetorical talent. If you have missed her series on Charlie Kirk’s assassination or on Brigitte Macron, you might want to check them out. Once you get into the story, it builds like true-life novel. ABN
Boltzmann Brain hypothesis is a thought experiment in cosmology and statistical mechanics suggesting that, in an infinitely long-lived universe approaching thermodynamic equilibrium, self-aware brains could spontaneously form from random quantum or thermal fluctuations—complete with false memories of a past that never existed.
These hypothetical brains would be indistinguishable from ordinary human brains in their thoughts, memories, and perceptions, but they would arise not through evolution or a structured universe, but as fleeting, isolated events in an otherwise empty, featureless cosmos.
The core paradox arises from statistical reasoning: it is vastly more probable for a single brain to fluctuate into existence than for the entire universe to have formed in the low-entropy state we observe. This leads to the unsettling conclusion that we are far more likely to be Boltzmann brains than evolved humans, which undermines the reliability of our memories and observations.
This idea was originally proposed as a reductio ad absurdum to challenge Ludwig Boltzmann’s explanation for the low-entropy state of our universe. Today, it remains a key concern in cosmology, especially in theories involving eternal inflation, multiverses, and de Sitter space, where the “measure problem”—how to assign probabilities in infinite universes—has no consensus solution.
Despite its theoretical appeal, most physicists consider the Boltzmann Brain hypothesis untenable as a description of reality, because it leads to cognitive instability: if you were a Boltzmann brain, your beliefs—including the belief in the hypothesis—would be unreliable. As physicist Sean Carroll puts it: “We’re not arguing that Boltzmann brains exist — we’re trying to avoid them.”
Recent research, including work by David Wolpert and Carlo Rovelli, suggests that the paradox stems from subtle circular reasoning in how we define the past and interpret entropy, implying that the hypothesis may rely on assumptions about time and observation that are not physically justified.
His shirt movement is difficult to explain with a rifle shot from any angle.
The necklace movement indicates the epicenter, not only from the area where it snaps but from its trajectory up and around his right shoulder around his back where it rest on the back of his left shoulder.
The shirt deformation on the back of his collar indicates a extremely quick gas expansion which is followed by the shrapnel lifting the front of his left collar up around his face. Combine this with the necklace movement and you get the epicenter of the energetic event.
Watch the cavitation of his chest and stomach traveling away from the epicenter. It’s the opposite direction of the cavitation of his neck and face, another sign of the epicenter.
Look at his knees… they quickly close and almost cross as he lifts his body from the chair. His elbows turn as his hands clasp, crossing his knuckles and flexing his wrist. His left leg even extends as he falls out of the chair.
More evidence of shrapnel impacts causing abrasions on Charlie. The areas underneath the shirt are close to the exiting gases would have been most likely to be impacted and we have visual evidence of just that. His left hand was in-between his legs directly under the bottom of his shirt which expelled gases and shrapnel after the explosive expansion. His right chest would have been closest to the shrapnel and shows abrasion directly underneath where the microphone was mounted. The more we see the more evidence leads us towards the conclusion that Charlie was assassinated by a hidden explosive charge in his wireless microphone and not shot with a .30-06 from the rooftop.
Oct 10, 2025 — Accurate Energetic Systems (AES) factory in TN explodes. 16 dead. Deadliest munitions blast in more than 100yrs. Facility leveled. Blueprints, prototypes, records—gone.
It happened days after the ‘exploding mic’ theory went viral. And then things got weird.
2/ May 1, 2025: DoD awards ONE contract ever for “MINIATURIZED-XS DEMOLITION CHARGES, ANTI PERSONNEL-XS”.
To AES – to the exact building that was levelled on Oct 10. $440k. Delivery: Aug 25, 2025.
This remains the only ‘XS’ device on since records began.
Both this factory and the Kirk assassination crime scene at UVU have been completely destroyed; the one blown up, the other excavated and paved over. ABN
Would a PETN shaped charge hidden in a RØDE Wireless PRO release any visible phenomena?
A small amount of light gray/white smoke or vapor is produced from incomplete combustion products (e.g., trace CO, unoxidized particles) and vaporized liner material (copper or polymer fragments). High explosives like PETN and Comp B have good oxygen balance, so smoke is much less than low explosives (e.g., black powder) or pyrotechnics. For such small quantities (grams), the smoke cloud would be modest — a brief puff dispersing quickly in open air, not a thick lingering plume.
This is speculative but excellent information. ABN
Exploding Mic Theory PART 2 — Jon Bray Reveals His Tests + The Butch Hibbs / Baron Theory
__________
UPDATE: Bray provides the best description I have seen for how Kirk was killed and by what.
To cut to the chase — (all speculation with excellent analysis), Kirk’s microphone apparatus contained a PETN shape charge which forcefully blew a gas at Mach 7 into his chest.
That is what killed him. To most doctors the wound would have looked like a bullet wound.
Shrapnel from the exploded mic or battery case was blown up under his shirt and struck Kirk in the neck.
This explains the odd nature of his neck wound and how it bled.
The neck wound was not what killed Kirk and was not part of the plan.
Be sure to watch the vid when you have time. Bray speaks calmly and with sufficient specificity to make a strong case. Highly recommended. ABN
The Charlie Kirk “shooting” is one of the biggest cover-ups in American history — and the evidence is exploding right in front of us.
Forget the fairy tale about Tyler Robinson and his magic 30-06 from the rooftop. The official story doesn’t hold up when you look at the REAL footage.
Charlie was wearing a tempered glass lavalier microphone (RØDE wireless style). Stew Peters dropped the bomb: glass shards EVERYWHERE in the transport SUV, flying on video during the collapse, embedded in clothing — classic signature of an explosive shatter, just like the Hezbollah pager bombs in 2024.
But zoom in closer — between Charlie’s legs in the rally footage, you see that telltale blur: a low-speed projectile ejecting downward. Not a high-velocity rifle round. Shrapnel behavior all the way.
And here’s the kicker that ties it all together: 3 months ago, I flagged something bouncing off the inside top of the tent in earlier event footage — looked exactly like a shell casing at first glance. Everyone dismissed it. I now 100% believe that was mic explosion shrapnel too.
Same low-velocity frag pattern, same directional ejections (neck area, downward, upward bounce on tent fabric). No bullet path matches the official narrative — no clear entry/exit, glass debris in impossible places, multiple fragment trajectories.
This was a remote-detonated shaped charge hidden in the mic battery/pack, Hezbollah/Mossad pager-style precision hit. Directional blast → instant kill + cover debris to blame a “lone gunman.”
The feds want you swallowing one magic bullet did all this while ignoring the glass apocalypse on camera. Who’s protecting the real killers?
Why the rush to pin it on Robinson when the physical evidence screams inside job? Patriots, wake up. This wasn’t random — it was calculated.
Drop your frame-by-frame breakdowns below. Tag@RealCandaceO and Repost if you’re done with the gaslighting. We demand the truth.
I believe I have misunderstood what is meant when people say Charlie’s mic exploded. The explosion would have come from the mic or mic apparatus under his shirt and not the mic he held in his hand.
That no damage to his shirt can be seen during and after the explosive can probably be explained by the explosive being affixed to his body with tape or adhesive.
There must have been some sort of cover over the explosive that directed the blast into his neck and not in all directions, which would have made the explosion obvious for all to see.
Something along these lines seems to me to be the most likely explanation for what actually killed him. ABN
UPDATE: In an earlier post, I wrote: I wonder if something had been taped to his neck, securing and concealing a very small but lethal charge which was detonated remotely and was designed to leave no trace.
There is no reason the charge had to be in his mic or mic apparatus. The explosive may have been affixed on or near his neck by someone helping Charlie gear up for the event.
Anomalies still remain with these explanations; chiefly, why is there no damage to his shirt? Why did his shirt rise up, covering his neck, then descend to reveal the fatal wound? ABN
Erika Kirk was reported to Child Protective Services (CPS) for child neglect and abandonment, according to multiple sources. The report allegedly originated from her nanny, who raised concerns about the children’s well-being and Erica’s prioritization of her public image over her parental responsibilities. This led to a CPS investigation, which uncovered significant concerns about the children’s emotional state and the lack of consistent parental presence. The court subsequently ordered immediate state-approved therapy for both children, indicating the severity of the situation. Despite viral claims on social media suggesting that custody had been transferred to Charlie Kirk’s parents, a fact-check from January 9, 2026, confirmed there is no verified source supporting the claim that Erika Kirk has lost custody of her children. However, a custody dispute is ongoing, with reports indicating that Charlie’s parents are involved and concerned about the children’s welfare. The situation has sparked widespread public scrutiny, with critics questioning Erica’s motives and parenting, particularly given her rapid return to public life and fundraising efforts following her husband’s death.
The above is an AI-generated summary of a multifaceted rumor which appears to have elements of truth. I am going to leave this one alone until something more definite comes to light. I am seeing some posts today with content from articles printed over a month ago. ABN
American Buddhist Net 