The screen stills before the shot that hit Kirk do show his earpiece but that same area is more vivid in the stills immediately following the shot.
This looks suggestive to me but not conclusive.
IF an Israeli-style exploding device armed with a self-destructing projectile is what caused Kirk’s death, what we can see in these stills might support that hypothesis.
IF he was shot from a rearward vantage, the movement of his head is well explained as is the exit wound on his neck’s left side (not seen in the above video).
IF he was hit by a bullet, it would have been a small caliber. But where is it?
IF he was hit by a self-destroying mini-missile, the evidence we see fits well.
IF he was killed by an Israeli-style self-destroying projectile device concealed in his earpiece, the video evidence also supports this.
All of this is speculation based on the low level of information available to the public. I dislike the way the FBI appears to be playing games with us through its meagre releases of information.
UPDATE: She claims there is no blood to be seen in the video from behind Kirk.
There is blood in many videos from the front, and on them it looks like it is gushing from a classic exit wound.
This all fits with the notion that Kirk was shot from behind and to his right.
The projectile (maybe not a bullet) appears to have hit his right ear and and exited his neck’s left side well below his left ear.
I think we should keep in mind that the projectile might have been a mini-missile programmed to home in on Kirk’s earpiece and possibly to disintegrate upon exit or after a preprogrammed very small fraction of a second; this would explain why no bullet has been found, or claimed to have been found.
What Candace might have seen in the rear video is Kirk’s head move left rapidly as the projectile strikes, but not the bleeding exit wound due to camera angle or the position of Kirk’s head.
There are videos and photos of super fast mini-drones at the event; it may be that one of them fired a tiny mini-missile that killed Kirk.
Another possibility is, recall the Israeli-made cell phones that blew up in people’s pockets. Kirk’s earpiece may have held something similar but that acted like a bullet.
If so, the forensic evidence would show an obliterated earpiece, a projectile tunnel through his head, and the exit wound. This would look to honest investigators like a bullet had struck his earpiece and continued on to the exit wound.
This would also explain why we can see the wire connected to his earpiece fly up and away from his right ear; and why the thicker cable it was attached to was pulled up violently under his shirt in front and around the back of his neck.
This video appears to show the shot came from above and a bit behind on Kirk’s right.
The streak near his right ear is his earpiece wire flying away from his ear upon impact from the bullet.
The impact of the bullet also pulls a further and thicker length of the cord running to his earpiece up, and it is this cord that you see sort of circling upward under the front of his shirt and around the back of his neck.
The wound on his neck’s left side is the exit wound and conforms precisely with how exit wounds appear but not entry wounds.
There have been many reports and videos of super fast, very small drones present at the rally during his talk.
It may be that one of those drones fired the shot that killed Kirk. Mercifully, if that was the case, he would have died instantly.
Another point worth making is that if he was killed by a miniature, military-grade attack-drone, we can be sure his assailants were professionally trained and equipped. And there was more than one.
This video appears to invalidate the lone sniper on the roof story. ABN
Just a couple of days before Kirk was killed I’d discovered that Tucker Carlson was planning to release a multi-part documentary series on the 9/11 attacks on the anniversary. Just before Kirk’s death I’d watched his hour-long interview on the Piers Morgan show, in which I thought he’d done an excellent job.
Apparently Carlson’s documentary would declare that everything we’d been officially told for twenty-four years about 9/11 was a lie so his series had the potential to massively jump-start the strong revival of the 9/11 Truth movement.
I’d been planning to make Carlson’s 9/11 series the topic of my new article until the Kirk killing blew everything out of the water and also led Carlson to delay the release for a couple of weeks.
Carlson and Kirk are quite friendly and assuming that Carlson’s documentary was as good as I’d expect, I’d think that Kirk would have strongly endorsed it to his huge number of mainstream conservative follower.
Hitherto, 9/11 Truthers have overwhelmingly been leftists, so Kirk’s support could have made it a completely bipartisan, and the resulting political impact would have been enormous.
So if Israel did arrange Kirk’s, I think that’s the reason that they needed to do so before the release of Carlson’s 9/11 series.
We’ve been lied to about our entire history and the origins of human civilization. We’re still being lied to because of what’s coming. But you can put two and two together if you look outside their mainstream scientific framework.
The speed of the North Magnetic Pole’s movement was around 10 km per year for most of the 20th century, then suddenly increased in the 1990s to over 50 km per year, moving toward Siberia…
They made this graphic in 2025, and what it reveals will change how you see your future—this is why billionaires are building doomsday bunkers!
Did you notice the sudden acceleration in the 1990s? That shift triggered true polar wander, which began altering Earth’s rotational axis.
Around 1995–2000, Earth’s spin axis took an abrupt turn toward the east and is now drifting almost twice as fast as before, at a rate of nearly 7 inches (17 centimeters) per year.
It’s no longer moving toward Hudson Bay, Canada, but instead toward Europe, just like the North Magnetic Pole!
I have posted information on this several times. Since it is quite plausible, and if true of enormous importance, I am posting this overview which is clear and concise. ABN
In other words, reading between the lines: The night before Kirk’s talk at UVU, rabbi Wolicki asked to have a one-hour Zoom conversation with him, to go through his pro-Israel “talking points”, because many of his fans “were turning on Israel” and “there were prominent people … actively working to [get him to] drop his support for Israel on a daily basis.” (In other words, Kirk was pushed in an anti-Israel direction by his followers and by people like Carlson and Owens, and needed strong opposite pressure to stay in line.) Kirk was “in a combative mood”, “playing the role of devil’s advocate.” (In other words, the conversation turned into an argument.) Kirk was assassinated the next day.
Another point I have not seen brought up is the timing of the shot is said to have been .23 seconds, which comes from an audio measurement of the shot from firing to hitting Kirk.
How do we know the audio has not been doctored?
That would be an easy thing to do. That .23 seconds yields a distance of 143 yards, precisely the distance the sniper is said to have been away from Kirk.
But that ‘sniper’ ran off with no apparent gun in hand.
Also, no bullet has been recovered and there appear to be no signs of it exiting, which should have been conspicuous.
Why did Kirk’s security immediately clean up the scene? And why did Zinn act like a decoy immediately after the shot?
There are numerous anomalies like these in the so-far official story of what happened. ABN
In just a couple of days, an impressive amount of information has been brought to light pointing to Israel’s strong motive to take out Charlie Kirk ASAP. I will here compile that information, as I found it on X and other Internet outlets.
In doing so, I am not influenced by my personal opinion on Kirk. I hardly ever listened to him before the last three days, and my opinion was mostly negative. Today, I still feel that Nick Fuentes was right in his very severe judgment of him as a traitor to his country paid by Israel to keep the MAGA movement in line with Israel’s interests, even when he was doing some “damage control”. That doesn’t mean, in my view, that Kirk was not sincere in his defense of Israel. As an evangelical Christian, he probably really saw this as a calling from God. On the other hand, I think that ambitious men are never exclusively interested by truth, that men in general (women included) are very good at lying to themselves about their true motivations, and that religion is a very practical way to lie to yourself. I also think that Kirk, although an energetic and talented fast talker, was not extremely intelligent—less intelligent than Fuentes, in my view. Like Fuentes, I don’t think anybody who supports Israel because the Bible tells him so can be very intelligent.
So based on what I have seen recently, I believe that Kirk was turning, but I wouldn’t be able to say to what extent his turning was motivated by his love for truth and morality, or by his concern for keeping the trust of his base of followers, and saving his political future. I suppose he was feeling opposite pressures from two sides: from his pro-Israel backers on the top, demanding that he keeps his unconditional support of Israel, and from his grass-root followers on the bottom, who find Israel’s actions and Israel’s influence on U.S. policies more and more unbearable (Kirk’s followers also listen to Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens or Nick Fuentes).
Whatever his motivations were, and no matter how far he was planning to go in his critics of Israel, the fact is that he had gone quite far already.
These two appear to be signaling the sniper just before he fires. I know very little about Kirk or his assassination but will post information that may be of interest. As of today, many believe Israel was the culprit as Kirk, who had been a major supporter of Israel, had begun to turn on them. That meant his usefulness was over and their best propaganda option was to kill him. I am filing most of this kind of information under ‘speculation’. The shooting strongly appears to have been done by professionals. Another suspect is Ukraine but it is not clear why this would benefit them. Maybe they will be tagged as the fall guy. ABN
UPDATE: Candace is keeping at this story and it’s actually pretty good. She is weaving in MKULTRA, military connections and an ancient cult that dates back to pre-Christian times. She might have caught a really big fish. ABN
American Buddhist Net 