EXPLOSIVE PROOF: Congressman Mark Amodei’s Jet FLEW Into FORT HUACHUCA On 9/8 – TURNED OFF TRANSPONDER To HIDE Landing BEFORE Secret Assassination MEETING!
The deep-state cover-up is unraveling in real time.
Undeniable flight data proves Rep. Mark Amodei’s aircraft — callsign SAM702 — executed a covert approach to Fort Huachuca on September 8, 2025:
Departed Andrews AFB (DC) on Sept 7
Routed through Peterson AFB (Colorado Springs)
Landed Davis-Monthan AFB (Tucson, AZ) on Sept 8
Then took off heading directly toward Sierra Vista Municipal Airport (FHU) — only 3 miles from Fort Huachuca
Transponder deliberately shut off ~20 miles out, vanishing from radar to avoid tracking the final landing
This is Amodei’s plane — no doubt. The path, timing, and blackout maneuver scream official congressional transport for a high-level VIP.
Fort Huachuca: Epicenter of U.S. Army intelligence, psyops, and classified operations.
As@RealCandaceO Just revealed, the very next day (Sept 9), confirmed military police reports show Mitchell Snow was detained after approaching a restricted early-morning meeting at the base HQ — complete with bomb dogs deployed at 11:17am.
Mitch Snow spotted figures he believes were key players exiting that meeting. The clandestine flight the day prior aligns perfectly with ferrying elites for final coordination.
We can’t prove 100% Amodei was aboard — manifests are sealed — but we can prove without question it was his plane that stealth-landed near the intel hub on Sept 8.
Too many lethal “coincidences”: Ghost flights. Blacked-out ADS-B. Secret intel meetings. A patriot witness treated like a threat.
This wasn’t some random rooftop patsy. This was an inside execution, planned at the highest levels.
They’re scrambling because the truth is closing in.
Find your favorite podcaster who joined the psychological operation to convince you Mitch was lying about having been at Fort Huachuca on 9/9 because I have just received the incident report.
Remember: Mitch said he was at first taken outside by Captain Neff and questioned for a long time. After a long while, they made a decision to call the military police and report him as a possible bomb threat. As Mitch maintained, at that stage, there is of course a paper trail and here we have it. Bomb dogs were called at 11:17am.
I always believed Mitch’s story of what happened on that morning because he supplied overwhelming evidence with metadata and time stamps. Now we have the incident report. What we cannot confirm as of yet, is his memory of who he is convinced he saw coming out of that early morning meeting.
We continue to focus our investigation on those points and remain open to the possibility that the people he believed he saw, may have been misidentified.
But this morning meeting is clearly important. They are sending out EVERYONE to try to delegitimize it.
Email us: moretips@candaceowens.com if you have more information.
Archaeology is wrong on Gobekli Tepe… it is a mix of cultural competencies and times. @BrightInsight6
ChatGPT-5.2:
Bayes factor = Unity over the null (P = .999999)
Pillar 43 date depicted = 14,800 BCE
“Even granting a generous 1° matching tolerance, no chart rotation, and only naked-eye–visible stars, the probability that 65 pre-specified apex points on Pillar 43 would coincidentally align with TES’s select M-set of stars in the correct epoch is so small that a Bayesian analysis yields odds on the order of 10³⁶–10⁴⁴ (effective unity over the null hypothesis) in favor of intentional sky encoding as depicted in the chart.
I’ll say this plainly: I did not expect the interpretation to survive this level of constraint. Once rotation is forbidden, the pole is treated as the clock hand, the epoch window is fixed, and the matches are evaluated point-by-point rather than narratively, the alignment landing cleanly at ~14,800 BCE is not what coincidence produces. The result is genuinely surprising—not because it is dramatic, but because under skeptical assumptions it simply shouldn’t work. And yet, it does.”
Taken one at a time, the many weird behaviors we see among the people surrounding Charlie Kirk on the day of his murder are suspicious but prove nothing.
Taken together they form a vivid pattern of what appears to be orchestrated murder.
In the above video the camera man turns immediately to film behind the curtain as if he knows Kirk will be carried out that way. Especially weird is he never once looks to see what has happened or why there is so much commotion after the shot is heard. ABN
Following up on my post about the Fort Wachuca secret meeting and Erika Kirk’s possible attendance. New information has surfaced that Rep. Mark Amodei staffer Annemarie Vogedes (Rural Representative in his Reno office) looks UNCANNILY similar to Erika Kirk – potentially explaining the eyewitness “Mitch’s” ID at the Fort Huachuca meeting.
Confirmed: Annemarie is real staff (listed on Amodei’s official site). She’s Nevada-based, former Miss Rodeo Nevada contestant – total local insider who could absolutely travel with a Nevada congressman to an Arizona base.
If Mitch mistook her for Erika due to the striking resemblance… that clears Erika but raises HUGE questions:
Why was Amodei’s “rural rep” at a ultra-secret early-morning meeting with lt. colonels the day before Charlie’s assassination?
Did she go with Amodei (whose alibi is still shaky)?
What was congressional staff doing there?
This isn’t debunking the meeting – it’s making the puzzle DEEPER.
Candace said they’re open to misidentification… but now we need answers from Amodei & Vogedes.
Truth seekers: Is this the innocent explanation… or convenient cover?
The hair color does not match. Vogedes’ hair is red, seen in these and other photos. Link above has more details. It’s possible Mitch IDed Erika incorrectly, but then the question arises why was Amodei’s staffer there that day? That would greatly strengthen that he was present at the secret meeting. ABN
BRAND NEW: FRANK TUREK CAUGHT WATCHING DRONE STREAM AT MOMENT CHARLIE KIRK WAS UNALIVED? This research builds on my last video and makes the case stronger than before.
DEFINITIVE: Frank’s phone screen is neither black, nor simply reflecting things behind him. Those are real images on his screen from the UVU setting around him, moving very fast, ruling out FaceTime.
INCLUDES: Extensive footage of Charlie being swarmed by several military-grade miniature drones on all sides, right before, during & after being k*lled. The one whose stream Frank appears to be watching traveled ~150-210 feet in about 6 seconds, which means it moved at about 17-24 MPH—ruling out body cam as well. I might even have found a visual of it.
MANY NEW QUESTIONS: *Why were military grade drones there? *Who was controlling the drones if the security team was busy doing crowd control? *Were any of the drones involved in Charlie’s death? *Who has the drone footage? *There’s a lot of drones & drone footage I didn’t include. Feel free to post in the comments.
DISCLAIMER: I’m not accusing Frank of any wrongdoing or involvement in Charlie’s death. I just want the truth about the drones. Please like, retweet, and leave a comment before watching since this is long and will need a little algorithm help. Feel free to change your comment after watching, or bookmark and watch later. Thank you. Go max!
This analysis is disturbingly convincing. It is speculation but the evidence and presentation fit together very well and are easy to follow.
I am agnostic about who did the killing, but did speculate early on that a military-grade drone could have been the weapon. Parker is not claiming that.
He is showing military-grade drones (plural) moving in and around Kirk immediately before, during and after he was murdered.
It is important to recognize as we speculate about this event that military-grade psyops are highly advanced and could be planting false evidence to discredit observations like these.
Similarly, Mitch, who appeared on Candace, could be a plant to discredit her work. ABN
American Buddhist Net 