We have black ABS plastic fragmentation in the floorboard of the SUV that took Charlie to the hospital. There are flat balck and glossy black fragments scattered in between the seats exactly where Charlie’s body was loaded into the SUV.
Røde wireless transmitters/receivers use a durable black ABS-like plastic housing (rigid, matte black interior and a glossy black exterior). While these cases are tough and resist normal drops, extreme mechanical force (e.g., impact, crush, or a explosive force) can cause the plastic to fracture into small, irregular shards — exactly like the tiny black pieces visible in the photo.
Thanks to Candace Owens for providing the details that bring it all together once again.
A lot of the disagreement here comes from what kind of emergence people are talking about.
Most philosophers are perfectly fine with weak (scientific) emergence. Temperature, liquidity, elasticity, traffic jams, economies, etc. all emerge from lower-level interactions. They’re not properties of single particles, but once you understand the micro-story, there’s nothing mysterious left over. Crucially, all of these are structural or functional properties, describable entirely in third-person terms.
The worry about consciousness isn’t really about complexity. It’s about the fact that consciousness seems to involve an experiential aspect — there being something it is like — and critics argue that this doesn’t follow from structural or functional descriptions in the same way temperature or liquidity do.
Similarly, when people say “you can’t open the skull and point to consciousness,” they’re not making a naïve spatial claim. The point is that no amount of third-person description of neurons, firings, or networks seems to capture or entail first-person phenomenal qualities like pain or redness.
So you see, consciousness isn’t treated as special because it’s complex, but because it seems to introduce a different kind of property — phenomenal experience — that standard emergence stories were never designed to explain. Whether that really is a problem is exactly what the debate is about.
First, the defense conflict: Michael Burt (high-profile SF attorney) is directly related to Terryl Farnsworth (the TPUSA AV guy who yanked SD cards post-hit and contaminated the scene). Michael is on Tyler Robinson’s legal team—despite family loyalty to the very insiders with access to Charlie’s stage setup. This is a blatant conflict of interest. How can Tyler get a fair trial when his own lawyer is tied to suspects who controlled audio, cameras, and evidence? It’s screaming setup—Tyler’s being railroaded as the patsy while real players skate.
Next, the aviation link: Terryl’s father-in-law Duane Burt held top executive roles at Duncan Aviation (Utah facility)—where those Egyptian-registered planes (flagged in Charlie’s threats and pre-attack searches) were located the day of the execution. Duane’s expertise and connections in elite aviation circles put this family smack in the middle of the “Egyptian planes” mystery. Coincidence? Or direct access to the tools needed for a sophisticated hit?
The bigger picture: The Farnsworth-Burt clan is embedded in Utah’s powerful “Mormon Mafia”—intermarried elite families (often sharing polygamous pioneer roots) who dominate politics, business, and institutions in Mormon-heavy states. Known for insider networks, loyalty to establishment figures like the Romneys, and quiet control over key sectors—these aren’t random players; they’re connected old-guard protecting their own.
This web—TPUSA insiders, defense sabotage, aviation anomalies, Mormon power ties—proves the fix is in. No way it’s all coincidence.
The above link provides an informative video and a great deal of apparently relevant information to Tyler Robinson’s defense team and the kinds of military-grade weapons and communication devices that may have been used in Kirk’s murder.
I am posting this under ‘information’ and ‘speculation’ for readers who know more about Utah than I do. This material comes from Project Constitution who has previously uncovered reliable information on the Kirk murder. ABN
I have watched only a 20 min excerpt of this video, but am posting because what I saw is stimulating to the imagination and provides a serious analysis of what might have really happened to Charlie Kirk and who did it. Surprised to find it on YouTube. ABN
UPDATE: I’ve now watched the whole video. It’s an excellent overview of the Kirk killing, replete with many illuminating details which thoroughly debunk the official narrative we have been told so far. One of the best breakdowns I’ve seen. Highly recommended. ABN
This may indicate that Israel, which was the world’s self-appointed laboratory for covid vaxxes, fudged its data and did not give its people the real covid vax, but a substitute; thus not damaging their women’s capacity to conceive and carry to term healthy babies.
At the same time the Western world, which did take real covid vaxxes and did press pregnant women to take them, suffered great damage to ovaries and many miscarriages.
This is entirely speculative but may indicate why the mRNA vax bioweapon was deployed and one of its deepest consequences.
Israel became the self-appointed covid vax laboratory for the world because, it claimed, its health data is among the best in the world.
That may well be true, but given Israel’s penchant for deceitful behavior, it is a reasonable suspicion that they fudged their data while encouraging the West, via trusted infiltrators and turncoats within the West, to universally recommend/force the vax on its populations.
A counterargument to the above is Israel has a large Orthodox community that births children ‘like the Amish’.
I hope someone who is good at health statistics, and savvy to how military strategies do not confine themselves to conventional weaponry, will follow up on this conjecture. ABN
After discussing the PETN hypothesis and showing it is unlikely because an explosive would cause more visible damage, the following drone hypothesis is asserted:
In stark contrast, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a close-range quadcopter sniper drone firing a 5.56mm round, aligning perfectly with documented Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) tactics in Gaza and Lebanon since 2023, where modified commercial drones like Elbit LANIUS or TIKAD models hover at low altitudes (under 100 meters) to deliver single precision shots with 5.56mm or 9mm munitions for targeted killings.
This method produces the exact signatures observed: a soft “pop” (no distant supersonic crack due to proximity), bird-sized overhead shadow in bystander videos, cauterized small entry from muzzle heat/friction, internal tissue shredding from yawing/fragmentation without exit, and the dramatic yet contained shirt puff exaggerated by the necklace and mic—driven by the bullet’s high-velocity temporary cavity (expanding radially to yank fabric without tearing it).
Ballistic studies confirm 5.56mm rounds create large temporary cavities in soft tissue like the neck, causing shock and energy dump that matches the no-exit, vertebral-damage wound path, while avoiding the chaotic external effects of explosives.
Eyewitness and human rights reports from Gaza describe these drones as tools for “minimizing civilian casualties” in urban warfare, but frequently resulting in precise, deniable hits—mirroring the Kirk event’s low-signature execution amid a crowd.
Many in comments say this rendition is overdone or ‘too strong’. But it does help to imagine the event, which may have occurred many times and will again someday soonish. ABN
New evidence has come to light suggesting Charlie wasn’t taken out by some “lone sniper” bullet. Rewatch the tragic footage frame by frame—you’ll see it clear as day. That long, skinny white wire flying off his body milliseconds after the “shot”? Everyone (including me at first) thought it was his necklace. WRONG.
It’s the thin wire from his microphone transmitter pack—clipped to his belt or pocket, even though the lapel mic was “wireless.” And right then, a mysterious flash and force originates FROM UNDER HIS SHIRT.
Explosives experts and former intelligence assets (including Mossad insiders who know these tactics all too well) are backing this: A tiny but lethal PETN1 charge hidden in the mic wire or transmitter detonated, firing shrapnel straight into Charlie’s neck, severing his carotid artery.
That explains why they only found a “fragment” inside him—no full bullet exit wound, no matching ballistics from a distant rifle. The official story is FALLING APART. Who had access to rig his mic?
Who benefits from silencing Charlie right as he was exposing the deep state? Steve (@stevendenoon ) and I broke this down in detail on the livestream—watch it now below
Pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), with the chemical formula C5H8N4O12, is a powerful secondary explosive known for its high brisance and sensitivity to shock and friction. It is a white crystalline solid with a melting point of 141.3 °C and a detonation velocity of approximately 8400 m/s at a density of 1.7 g/cm³. PETN is significantly more powerful than TNT PETN is highly sensitive and can be initiated by mechanical shock, friction, or electric sparks, with a minimum energy requirement of 10–60 mJ for direct initiation by an electric spark. It is also capable of being detonated by a laser pulse, such as a Q-switched ruby laser with a duration of 25 nanoseconds and 0.5–4.2 joules of energy. Despite its sensitivity, PETN is stable enough for safe handling and storage ↩︎
_________
Full video available at link above.
This is new to me but makes the best sense of any hypothesis so far. ABN
In replies to this Grok analysis, Ethical Skeptic says: With each new confirmation, comes the thrill of a successful model prediction – and then follows the existential reality that it makes this tin-foil hat theory, not only plausible, but a looming possible reality.
American Buddhist Net 