
Tag: totalitarianism
Exquisite description of how globalism is destroying Canada and the West
Wise words
The ‘All-star apex predator cast of the national security state’ described by Mike Benz
This video beautifully describes how US censorship has evolved and is evolving to circumvent First Amendment rights to free speech. An aesthetic criticism which should not detract from the information presented is Mike could have presented this better than just putting a camera in front of his face. That said, don’t skip this one. This is the new look of totalitarianism, censorship, mind-control. I keep hoping that at some point a majority of thoughtful Americans will see what is obviously going on. I still have hope but the power of hierarchical language, concepts, and real-world interpersonal relationships is super-strong, even stronger than I had suspected just a few years ago. ABN
Mandatory vaccines when the risk of infection is highest in those who have had the most doses

https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292?login=false#407193740

From every angle, we are being driven toward chaos, confusion, unsustainable absurdity. ABN
The WHO and pandemics — RFK Jr and Dr Meryl Nass
Recommended by a friend. I have not listened yet but he says it contains ‘a lot of updates on the covid stuff and many other small details.’ And I don’t doubt it. For many of us, the covid topic has become tedious but I believe we should stay on top of it for at least a few more years. It is at the heart of the totalitarian transition we are experiencing in all areas, not just health care. The mind-control techniques used during covid are fresh experiences and are core examples of how the totalitarians will proceed. Both Nass and Kennedy have been silenced and persecuted by mind-controllers and both understand the paramount importance of free speech with reach. ABN
Schumer’s First AI Conference Sets Goal of 2024 Election, With Big Tech Embracing Govt Regulation
According to a recent media report, Senator Chuck Schumer led an AI insight forum that included tech industry leaders: Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Tesla, X and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, NVIDIA President Jensen Huang, Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg, technologist and Google alum Eric Schmidt, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.
Additionally, representatives from labor and civil rights advocacy groups which included: AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights President and CEO Maya Wiley, and AI accountability researcher Deb Raji. The group was joined by a list of prominent AI executives, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
Notably absent from the Sept 13th forum was anyone with any real-world experience that is not a beneficiary of government spending. This is not accidental. Technocracy advances regardless of the citizen impact. Technocrats advance their common interests, not the interests of the ordinary citizen.
That meeting comes after DHS established independent guidelines we previously discussed {GO DEEP}.
DHS’ AI task force is coordinating with the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency on how the department can partner with critical infrastructure organizations “on safeguarding their uses of AI and strengthening their cybersecurity practices writ large to defend against evolving threats.”
Remember, in addition to these groups assembling, the Dept of Defense (DoD) will now conduct online monitoring operations, using enhanced AI to protect the U.S. internet from “disinformation” under the auspices of national security. {link}
So, the question becomes, what was Chuck Schumer’s primary reference for this forum?
Continue reading “Schumer’s First AI Conference Sets Goal of 2024 Election, With Big Tech Embracing Govt Regulation”Major Tripwire – Homeland Security Publishes Guidance for Using Artificial Intelligence as Tool for Surveillance, Monitoring and Tracking of American Citizens
You might ask, why is the Dept of Homeland Security (DHS) in the business of conducting widescale surveillance, monitoring and tracking of American citizens.
Unfortunately, if you are asking that question, then you likely don’t know the first, fourth and fifth amendment to the U.S. constitution were usurped by the 2001 Patriot Act.
George W Bush and Dick Cheney created the domestic surveillance system under the auspices of DHS and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Barack Obama and Joe Biden then took that DHS surveillance system and modified the dials (Justice Dept., FBI) so the surveillance only applied to their ideological enemies.
If you have followed my outlines on this issue [Category Here], you will note exactly where this latest development falls on the continuum. The 2024 election is right around the corner. Previously I stated the artificial intelligence (AI) component to the internet surveilllance system was going to launch toward the end of this year. Well, DHS has just announced exactly that [SEE HERE].
I find it very interesting the DHS memo was issued on August 8th, but only published for the general public yesterday. July and August were when I first identified AI spider crawls were already underway. Pay very, very close attention to the two underlined words in the following paragraph:
Take out the word “improper” and the admission is, DHS uses AI to profile, target and discriminate. In the second sentence, DHS currently participates in systemic, indiscriminate and/or large-scale monitoring, surveillance, or tracking of individuals. The only thing those sentences in the paragraph say, is that DHS will not allow AI to create improper outcomes within a system they outline that already exists.
Continue reading “Major Tripwire – Homeland Security Publishes Guidance for Using Artificial Intelligence as Tool for Surveillance, Monitoring and Tracking of American Citizens”Dove hit by growing BOYCOTT for hiring BLM activist Zyahna Bryant who ruined white student Morgan Bettinger’s life

Boycotting, noncompliance, spreading the word, some sort of group solidarity against the madness are the best means we have to actually save world civilization, and that is not an overstatement. Woke-coercion, mind-control, censorship, bad science, and lying news media are destroying the world’s chance to thrive. There are more of us than them as the poll above and other noncompliance polls show. ABN
Worst speech of the year — UN Under Secretary for Global Communications GASLIGHTS the world
This speech is a garbage pile of censorial cliches, logical fallacies, red-herrings, appeals to ignorance, and excuses for yet more authoritarian aggrandizement at the UN. I challenge readers to watch the whole thing. I did and found it alarming. My guess is Fleming is naively sincere in her desire to censor the world and comfortable with the belief that her totalitarian inclinations are good. She speaks the lingo of globalist bureaucrats, soldiers of unreason, who are bent on destroying civilization in their own image. ABN
Jewish Censorship Is the Leading Cause of Anti-Semitism — Andrew Anglin
My personal story is a long and confusing one, which I regularly reflect on personally. If it ends up being of historical interest, the thing is probably going to need to be figured out by people who are not me from my private writings after I’m dead. But whatever the details, I have been labeled by both the SPLC and the ADL, as well as probably all mainstream media outlets, as “the most influential anti-Semite of the 21st century.” It’s a title I am very proud of.
Although few people cite me as a source, I remain the single most widely-read English-language journalist in the world, even after having suffered the worst censorship of anyone in history. A lot of people like my materials about women, and my geopolitical analysis. But ultimately, all of what I write is first and foremost filtered through anti-Semitism.
Defining “Anti-Semitism”
“Anti-Semitism” is made purposefully difficult to define by the Jews. They are able to obfuscate the definition because they’ve created a situation where even asking for a clarification on what the term means is considered anti-Semitic. The term has become so powerful and so damaging to the reputations of anyone smeared with it that no one dares even tiptoe around the fringes. As soon as there is a hint that the ADL or other Jewish groups are preparing to levy the smear, people surrender. Or, at least that was the case before Kanye West made his big push last year against this Jewish system.
We are now witnessing a kind of encore to the Kanye West pushback on the Jews in the form of Elon Musk’s attempts to push back on the Jewish censorship agenda, which is costing his company billions of dollars. He has officially been labeled an “anti-Semite” by the ADL because he thinks (or, at least, he argues) that Twitter should allow all forms of legal speech.
The implied meaning of “anti-Semitism” is that you “hate the Jews for no reason.” The “working definition of anti-Semitism,” which was created by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) and which is now used by several institutions – including the Ron DeSantis and Greg Abbott state governments – defines behaviors that constitute “expressions” of anti-Semitism, but it does not attempt to address what anti-Semitism actually is, simply referring to it as a “certain perception.” Again, the implication is that it is a blind hatred for no reason.
On ‘freedom of speech but not reach’

Exactly right. This same militaristic logic has also been used in destroying individuals in America in a decades-long infiltration and takeover of major American institutions. Besides reputation destruction, educational misdirection, jail-bait traps, and more, many talented American and European young men and boys have been physically disabled in clandestine attacks. This has caused natural leaders to fail to live up to their natural potential, thus demoralizing those who know them. As one informant said to me, ‘They will still be leaders but they will lead people in wrong directions. We want to make examples of people like that, discredit them entirely.’ The online versions of this strategy, now backed by AI, on the one hand may be more effective but on the other may alert far more people to what is being done to the West. When individuals are physically attacked and harmed (poison, psychosurgery, aural damage, etc), it’s hard for most to figure out what happened. When huge swaths of the population are muted or silenced it’s easier to see. What I am saying here is the kind of speech they want out of reach because they know it is true. If I were wrong, why would they bother? ABN




