“The whole process of replacing a declining system with a more complex mining-based enterprise is now supposed to take place with a fragile banking system, dysfunctional democracies, broken supply chains, critical mineral shortages and hostile geopolitics.”~Andrew Nikiforuk
…The type of ‘green’ agenda being pushed is a multi-trillion market opportunity for lining the pockets of rich investors and subsidy-sucking green infrastructure firms and also part of a strategy required to secure compliance required for the ‘new normal’.
It is, furthermore, a type of green that plans to cover much of the countryside with wind farms and solar panels with most farmers no longer farming. A recipe for food insecurity.
Those investing in the ‘green’ agenda care first and foremost about profit. The supremely influential BlackRock invests in the current food system that is responsible for polluted waterways, degraded soils, the displacement of smallholder farmers, a spiralling public health crisis, malnutrition and much more.
It also invests in healthcare — an industry that thrives on the illnesses and conditions created by eating the substandard food that the current system produces. Did Larry Fink, the top man at BlackRock, suddenly develop a conscience and become an environmentalist who cares about the planet and ordinary people? Of course not.
Four days after German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack released his final video on graphene hydroxide, he was seized by a sudden unexplained attack that caused paralysis, weakness, profound disorientation (like he was drunk), and collapse with loss of breathing. His pregnant wife described the event in two videos. In the first video, her description led early listeners to assume that Dr. Noack was physically attacked, but that was not the case. In the second video, Dr. Noack’s partner further explained that she suspected he was struck by some kind of directed energy weapon (and reported at one point that the electricity went out just before he was incapacitated.)
This would not be the first time that Dr. Noack was attacked prior to his sudden and unexpected death, as he was assaulted by police the year before in Nov. 2020. During live filming, Dr. Noack suddenly interrupted his discussion, and pounding and yelling could be heard from the next room. Even without translation, the video is extraordinarily chilling. Police, yelling in German, barge into Dr. Noack’s studio, wearing face masks and bulletproof vests, all in black and carrying weapons. They wrestle the doctor to the floor, and eventually, one of the police, himself panting with anxiety, disables the camera as raised voices continue off-camera. I had to locate this video in archives as it had been erased from internet links.
We are being controlled, steered, managed, stifled, misdirected, propagandized, lied to, frightened, restrained, repressed, and generally bamboozled at every turn.
Politically, virtually everything we see throughout the West entails rapidly increasing totalitarianism, total state-control of the human mind. What is not yet widely recognized among those who can see what is happening is totalitarianism is often violent at precise individual levels. It is very plausible that Noack was murdered with a directed energy weapon. His violent death was meant to send a signal to others.
At less conspicuous levels, totalitarian violence is employed not to kill individuals but to to weaken or destroy them, thereby also weakening their communities. Typically, violence of this nature is done clandestinely against promising children and young adults to disable them before they can cause the totalitarians any trouble. Poison, psychosurgery, sensory damage, psychological isolation and more are the tactics used. By weaking or disabling the young, they weaken their entire community.
Israel has used this tactic for decades against Palestinians. Shooting children in the eyes or ears with rubber bullets or the knees with real ones can disable individuals for life. Random arrests and torture, psychological or otherwise, can be as harmful as psychosurgery or accompany it. ABN
The Scottish Government confirmed today that the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act will take effect on April 1, bringing with it some of the most draconian curbs on freedom of speech and expression in any free democracy on earth. It has taken 40 years longer than Orwell predicted… but we have finally arrived in the totalitarian nightmare that he feared.
If somebody breaks into your garden shed and steals your bike, for example, or if your car is vandalized, then no action will be taken unless there is a witness or other evidence such as CCTV footage. However, if you were to say that you wouldn’t want an adult transgender female with male genitalia to share a changing room at the swimming pool with your daughter, then you may risk prosecution.
The Hate Crime Act was pushed through the Scottish Parliament by the current First Minister Humza Yousaf during his stint as Justice Secretary, although much like almost everything else he has ever been involved with (barring his deeply held convictions over Israel and Gaza) it wasn’t actually his idea.
Indeed, it was the brainchild of his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon, who hoped to leave as a “legacy” the Gender Recognition Reform Act that would allow people in Scotland to legally change their gender after just three months and without any medical grounds for doing so.
The basis of these laws is totalitarian mind-control and nothing more or less. Laws like this ‘work’ by frightening people into silence and self-censorship; their absurdity is a feature not a bug as irrational controls produce stronger internal submission than rational ones. The underlying psychological mechanism of this species of legalistic mind-control is to seize control of a community’s psycholinguistic constellation of words and thought. Once major words and concepts have been commandeered, only the most thoughtful and intelligent will understand what is happening, and only if they pay attention. The other 50-90% of the population can be expected to blithely ride this ever-changing lexical conveyor belt straight to totalitarian hell. ABN
BREAKING INSIDE THE PENTAGON: Associate Director in the Office of the Secretary of Defense says, “Why not just have an open border?” “Tear down the wall.”
“I think we should repeal the Second Amendment and take the guns all away!” says Jason Beck, who has a classified security… pic.twitter.com/QSuXmgQAPz
This interview is from CA Fitts Solari Report, and is available to the public for free. ABN
UPDATE: Just finished watching this. It’s a terrific discussion, very informative. Don’t miss it! Essential for understanding what the basic banking/ economic problem in USA is, how to fix it, and why Central Bank Digital Currency will be a disaster for everyone except the central bankers who will control everything. ABN
NOTICE: Icke is referring to the X-embedded video above. That short snippet is from a longer video from seven years ago when Trump was speaking about a system for controlling foreign visa holders and illegals.
All of that being said and understood, consider also that it is irrational to believe anyone can stop the advance of technology, including surveillance technology. It is equally irrational to presume that we the people can stop the application of this technology or that we live in a system designed to ever consider our well-being, let alone the will of a small minority who can see what is happening with surveillance technology. Please read my comments on Webb’s piece here for more on this.
At the risk of exploding people’s heads, I am gonna say this: there are conceivable advantages to more surveillance, particularly in greatly reducing street crime (assuming police are charged with following up and courts apply the law). Yes, of course, there are terrible things to be concerned about but there is no way to stop the tech, just as there is no way to successfully ‘outlaw’ bioweapons or space weapons or violating treaties that pretend they are doing that. We live in a world controlled by elites who are fighting savagely among themselves. The best we can realistically hope for is that the best elites (for us) win. Right now, Trump, Musk, Carlson and others look much better to me that Biden, Zuckerberg, Maddow and their ilk. I am 100% in favor of Webb and Icke and others writing as they do, but let’s not allow their dark visions to keep us from seeing the even deeper reality—elites always rule, some elites are better than others. ABN
UPDATE: Xi provides a crystal clear description of the rise of communism in China and totalitarian parallels in today’s USA & West. Everybody should fully understand what Xi is saying, which is that a savage elite is vying for total control of everything, total power over everyone. Their ideologies are entirely bogus and so is their ‘science’ and all of their rationales. The people in top power positions today are psychopaths who do nothing but lie and kill in their quest for world domination. There is some chance we can slow them down or even replace them with a more beneficent elite. Even if you are well versed in recent Chinese history, Xi’s account is well-worth viewing. She is a master at putting things simply and never dodging the question. ABN
The political response to the crisis at the southern border continues to advance the bipartisan “smart wall,” having been backed by Trump and Biden alike. This bipartisan consensus reaches far beyond the US, as much of the world is similarly speeding along in implementing “digital borders.”
The disastrous situation at the US-Mexico border is, and has been, intentionally produced. Throughout the last several administrations, regardless of campaign and other public rhetoric, the porous nature of the border has remained unresolved. On several occasions, the situation as it has developed has been blamed largely on incompetence and government inefficiency. Though some administrations have been tougher than others in regards to terrestrial migration (under some metrics), the US-Mexico border has not been sealed off so to force entrants to cross through officially recognized and managed ports of entry.
Under the current administration, it has been pointedly obvious that even the sections of the border that do contain physical barriers are being dismantled on purpose, all the while illegal crossings have risen to unprecedented levels. Whatever the motives for this deliberate policy on the part of the Biden administration, the end result has been the widespread characterization of the crisis as an “invasion,” priming the voter bloc usually most concerned with border security – the American Right – for military-style “solutions.”
While the justifications for the frenzied media coverage are based on the actual reality that the border is indeed highly insecure (and has been for some time), the policy responses from American politicians reveal that there is a bipartisan consensus about what must be done. Tellingly, the same “solution” is also being quietly rolled out at all American ports of entry that are not currently being “overrun”, such as airports. That solution, of course, is biometric surveillance, enabled by AI, facial recognition/biometrics and autonomous devices.
This is an excellent article. It outlines the major goals, actors, and popular fears of the inevitable global surveillance state. What we the people have—and the only thing we have—is the vague will of the masses. With that vague will we can sometimes cancel elite plans or dampen them, as we saw with monkeypox and more recently covid vaxxes.
Our vague will, however, has zero chance of stopping the panopticon, or any of the technology that supports it. Since we the people have never had much more than a vague will which is only rarely successful in doing anything, I see no reason to be especially concerned about an even more efficient spy state. We already all know and have accepted that all of our communications are recorded, so why should we expect the recording to not become even more precise and used for even more controls?
For millennia, large societies have always had kings and queens, elites and slaves. It is no different today. May the best elite win. The only secure hope we have today is that a deeply civilized, very intelligent elite who will rule benevolently, will win. In a reasonable world under a reasonable elite, continued tech advancement and the use of technology to improve human biology will yield a much more intelligent population with more and better options than we have today.
Does this mean surrender? Yes and no: no one surrenders to the inevitable, or everyone does; and the vague will of the masses will act as a weak rudder sometimes. ABN
Ep. 76 As they lecture us endlessly about human rights in other countries, the Biden administration is trying to kill journalist Julian Assange for the crime of embarrassing the CIA. His wife Stella joins us from his extradition hearing. pic.twitter.com/DetYUeaBFl
Ep. 75 The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. "What I’m describing is military rule," says Mike Benz. "It’s the inversion of democracy." pic.twitter.com/hDTEjAf89T
Correct, but Musk does not understand that decades of clandestine violence underlie this totalitarian takeover. Most people do not see it because when a young person goes off the rails, they assume it is drugs or booze or bad luck when the originating cause is poison, psychosurgery, sensory damage. ABN
You could also say both are going as far as they think they can go without being destroyed. We are nearing a point where most people know about and many understand the effects of Jewish power in USA and the West. The next point to reach will be everybody knows, then everybody knows everybody knows. Then the game is up. The danger in getting from here to there is yet another dramatic, even cataclysmic, psyop to take our attention off the perpetrators; such as terror attacks in USA, which may involve CCP operatives and a new virus being released in many places at once, regional war in and around Israel, WW3. I see Polly’s point and also that Bret and Tucker did say a lot and by not saying everything they may have made that point even stronger. In a totalitarian regime, and we are living in one, people learn to talk about the regime by getting close to saying it but not fully saying it. Even I feel the need to do that to some extent. It’s not always a matter of bravery or dedication to truth but also being left alive to speak at all. ABN
American Buddhist Net 