
Mayorkas, Harris and Biden did similar in USA when they advertised and openly encouraged the invasion of some 21 million illegals into USA. ABN
Do your best. Speak the truth.

Whoever had control of the “AUTOPEN” is looking to be a bigger and bigger scandal by the moment. It is a major part of the real crime, THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020 WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN! Millions and millions of people knew that, but the Radical Left Democrats waged a campaign of inoculation and innocence like none that had ever been waged before. THIS IS WHY THE UNSELECT COMMITTEE OF POLITICAL THUGS, WHO WERE GIVEN A FULL AND COMPLETE PARDON BY THE PERSON WHO WIELDED THE NOW ILLEGALLY USED AUTOPEN, DELETED AND DESTROYED ALL EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION FROM THEIR CORRUPT AND VICIOUS WITCH HUNT AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHER PEOPLE, WHOSE LIVES WERE COMPLETELY SHATTERED AND DESTROYED BY THIS HISTORICALLY CRIMINAL EVENT. Remember, it all began with DIRTY COP James Comey, Obama, a hapless and cognitively impaired Sleepy Joe Biden, and my now very famous ACCUSATION that,“THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!” Whoever had control of the Autopen is just the beginning. The biggest crime of all is that THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WAS RIGGED! I (MAGA!) WON THE ELECTION BY MILLIONS OF VOTES, AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT. GOD BLESS AMERICA, FOR THE FIGHT HAS JUST BEGUN!!!
Former FBI Director James Comey was escorted from his home to be interviewed by the Secret Service about a social media post that Republicans insisted was a call for violence against President Donald Trump.
CNN showed video of Comey, 64, leaving his house in his suburban Virginia and heading to the Secret Service’s Washington field office just before 6pm.
The interview is part of an ongoing Trump administration investigation and is expected to help investigators assess the purpose and intent of the post, and whether Comey intended to communicate a threat to the president, which he flatly denied.
Any decision on whether charges should be filed would be up to Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump said on Friday, though there’s a high bar in proving that comments or posts amount to direct threats of violence.
The interview is standard for the Secret Service while investigating comments perceived as potentially threatening.
At issue is an Instagram post from Thursday in which Comey wrote ‘cool shell formation on my beach walk’ under a picture of seashells that appeared to form the shapes for ’86 47.’
106
UPDATE: This is a very good interview. First posted a day or two ago, I am bumping it to the top because I have only just had time to watch it and discover how good it is. Martin provides a fascinating overview of how DC and USA look from an insider’s point of view. Highly recommended. ABN
Tulsi Gabbard fired ‘deep state’ heads of the security council because they oppose President Donald Trump, according to insiders.
The director of national intelligence let Mike Collins, the acting chair of the National Intelligence Council and his deputy Maria Langan-Riekhof go on Tuesday, senior intelligence officials told Fox News Digital.
Sources told the outlet Collins already has whistleblower complaints against him for political bias and ‘deliberately undermining’ the Trump administration.
Collins also has close ties to Michael Morrell, the former deputy director of the CIA who penned a letter in 2020 that claimed Hunter Biden‘s controversial laptop has ‘all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.’ He also set out to get signatures from top ex-intelligence employees, officials revealed.
Meanwhile, Langan-Riekhof has been a ‘key advocate’ for diversity, equity and inclusion agendas, and is ‘radically opposed to Trump,’ whistleblowers alleged.
Top officials not only revealed Gabbard’s recent firings, but also shared that she has decided to relocate the National Intelligence Council from the CIA to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
She chose to do so in a bid to ‘directly hold accountable any improper action and politicization of intelligence,’ they stated.
According to officials, many leakers are often ‘career bureaucrats that are entrenched in Washington politics’ and that ‘it takes time to weed them out.’
Deputy U.S Attorney General Todd Blanche, United States Solicitor General D. John Sauer, and Dept of Justice Investigative Lead, Attorney Ed Martin, are very serious people in Main Justice.
The deliberate nature of the trio recently resulted in the Senate division of the weaponized DC system, rejecting the nomination of Ed Martin to lead the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington DC. The need for control is a reaction to fear. Apparently, the DeceptiCons were fraught.
DAG Blanche coordinates and prioritizes the day-to-day USAO office activity around the country. Blanche is the general in charge of eliminating Lawfare efforts. Solicitor General Sauer faces the Supreme Court. Sauer is the general in charge of framing the arguments from Blanche that reach the court. Meanwhile, DC USAO Martin, now with position changed to Presidential Appointment Martin in charge of investigating weaponized justice efforts, is the lead investigator on all enmeshed corruption within Washington DC.
Blanche, Sauer and Martin are serious and purposefully driven men.
In our discussions and outlines CTH does not trade in hopium, nor do we promote the popular albeit nonsensical and futile anticorruption efforts favored by most high-profile media types. The reality of the DC silo system is not easily understood, and that is entirely by design. High profiles may generate headlines, but do not generate adequate results as increasingly evidenced by AG Bondi, Director Patel and Deputy Bongino, all performers.
As the Washington DC USAO, Ed Martin was in position to address the known and documented activity of a variety of former DOJ officials. There’s a strong argument to be made that’s the reason why the DOJ’s corrupt allies in congress moved to eliminate the threat Martin represented. However, their collective result didn’t remove him, nor did it change the objective, it just changed Mr Martin’s title.
Whereas Washington DC USAO Ed Martin previously carried the authority of the Attorney General, in the changed dynamic special appointee ADAG Ed Martin now carries the authority of the President of the United States. A serendipitous outcome.
…Reasons to Suspect Eberhart
Investigation of NORAD and its commander Eberhart is warranted, apart from the evidence for lying to Congress. Additional reasons to focus on Eberhart include the following nine facts.
- As Commander in Chief of the U.S. Space Command (CINCSPACE), Eberhart was responsible for setting Infocon levels.[19] Infocon is an alert system that defends against attacks on communications networks within the DOD. Just 12 hours before the 9/11 attacks, an order was given to lower Infocon to its least protective level.[20] Setting Infocon at a lower level made it easier for people to hack into or compromise the DOD computer networks, including the air defense system.[21]
- As both CINCSPACE and Commander in Chief of NORAD (CINCNORAD), Eberhart was in charge of many of the highly coincidental military exercises (i.e. war games) that were going on that morning.
- Eberhart did nothing effective in response to the 9/11 hijackings, despite being present in the military’s teleconference as those hijackings were in progress. He did not order the scrambling of jets, he did not order an escort for Air Force One, and he did not provide leadership.
- Eberhart also failed to implement military control over U.S. airspace until well after the attacks were over. Although it was his prerogative to do so, Eberhart did not implement SCATANA, the process of assuming military control over the U.S. airspace, until an hour after the last plane had been destroyed. Eberhart later said that he had waited until it finally became “obvious” to him that a coordinated terrorist attack was underway.[22] He told the 9/11 Commission that, although people were telling him to take control of the airspace earlier, he didn’t feel that the military could “provide traffic de-confliction like the FAA has.”[23]
- In the middle of the 9/11 attacks, Eberhart decided to drive between Peterson Air Force Base and NORAD’s Cheyenne Mountain Operations Center (CMOC). Normally this 12-mile drive takes 30 minutes but it took Eberhart between 45 minutes and an hour to make the drive that morning. No reason was ever given (or requested) for why Eberhart did not fly directly to CMOC from Peterson, making use of the Cheyenne Mountain helicopter port. Eberhart made conflicting statements about his reasons for making this trip, saying that he stayed for a while at Peterson because he “did not want to lose communication.”[24] Nevertheless, Eberhart lost communication at the most important time by leaving at approximately 9:30 am (EST), when two of the hijacked planes were still flying wildly off-course. His reason for doing this was that things had “quieted down.”[25]
- While on his way to the CMOC he was in the U.S. military’s air threat call via cell phone. In this call, at 9:49 am, Eberhart “directed all air sovereignty aircraft to battle stations, fully armed.”[26] Although this might sound like decisive action, the command apparently grounded all interceptor jets that had not yet taken off due to the fact that “battle stations” is a grounded status. Other military leaders later gave orders to actually scramble the jets. And despite his involvement, Eberhart portrayed himself as being out of the loop entirely. For example, he told the 9/11 Commission that he had “no knowledge of the circumstances that initiated the scramble” of fighter jets from Langley AFB and that he had just “recently” been made aware that it happened (in March 2004).[27]
- Eberhart failed to explain the multiple changes in the account of 9/11 that were given by NORAD. In fact, he seemed to tell his staff to change the NORAD timeline as much as was needed in order to prevent further questioning about the military’s performance.[28]
- For whatever reasons, Eberhart also gave false information about the NORAD response to others. General Richard Myers, acting CJCS that morning, said that Eberhart told him there were “several hijack codes in the system.” Yet none of the four planes had squawked the hijack code on 9/11 and therefore it is not clear how such codes could have been in the system.[29]
- NORAD failed to cooperate with the 9/11 Commission. Even as late as March 2004, the Commission was struggling to get basic documents about 9/11 performance from Eberhart’s organization.[30] In some cases, such as with the after-action reports that follow all military actions, the Commission never received the NORAD documents.
Of all these concerns, it is the military exercises that NORAD was conducting on 9/11 that have drawn the most attention from concerned citizens. When questioned about them, Eberhart claimed that the impact of the 9/11 exercises on NORAD’s response was that they “at most cost us 30 seconds.”[31] That was clearly not the case.
This is an excerpt from a longer article. If you are unfamiliar with 9/11 details of this nature, be sure to read the whole article linked above. 9/11 is another USA official myth that many are aware is profoundly false. Exposure of this myth seems to be following the arc of the JFK exposure. A few drips, a few more drips, until it ‘all’ comes out 60 years later, all meaning the final layer of moribund coverup after all crucial evidence has been destroyed. From a conspiracy POV, the strongest evidence of both JFK and 9/11 points to Israeli actors working with CIA actors, if not controlling the entirety of both operations, for the benefit of Israel. ABN
UPDATE: This is a must watch for the latest, fullest information about border security and illegal aliens still remaining in USA. Homan is clear as a bell and does most of the talking and answering questions. Highly recommended. ABN
UPDATE: We all know the punishment must fit the crime. This is the pragmatics of the law, as well as its morality and ethics. What few people understand is the law itself must also fit the situation. If our country is flooded illegally with illegal aliens, many of them hostile, the law must fit this situation. Thus, when SCOTUS meets literally in the middle of the night and rules on punctilios, they have violated not just the pragmatics of the law but also the very meaning of Constitutional interpretation, which is their only job. Please give this some thought. It’s a glaring philosophical and legal mistake. ABN