[Don’t skip this article. It’s as bad or worse than you ever thought. If true, and it almost certainly is, the only solution is dissolve the agency entirely and do it immediately. ABN]
When originally nominated and appointed, the primary reason I shared a lack of confidence in both Kash Patel and Dan Bongino was my acceptance they really did not grasp the severity of the institutional corruption that exists within the agency they were tasked to lead.
Today in a Tweet Message, Deputy Dan Bongino seems to realize things are not what he thought they were.
It’s really not that difficult an assessment to make because even though I knew the FBI was fraught with corruption, it was not until I was intercepted in Washington DC and told specific details about the agency operation that I realized this was more than just a DC or field office issue.
As it was outlined to me and evidenced clearly in the six years since that original series of conversations, the FBI has a very specific recruitment profile they follow that ensures the current legacy within it. The psychological tests, entry reviews and ongoing HR assessments continually excise any individual that does not meet a specific and corrupt profile.
DEA agents, CBP agents, former IC operatives, sketchy state police officers and other federal law enforcement agents who have engaged in bribes, kick-back schemes and outright theft are generally prioritized in the recruitment process. The INSD officials who hold sway over the internal dynamics/investigations within the FBI are the ones who guarantee the system perpetuates.
It is far worse than most would understand or believe. Factually, I had a difficult time grasping it until I was guided in what to look for. The main responsibility of the FBI as an organization is to protect the DC system from review and accountability.
The FBI is nationally in charge of National Security “clearances” and that is the primary tool used to control the associates within the organization. Put that level of power into the hands of people who are tasked with protecting the system within DC and what comes over time is exactly what exists today. There is no way to break down this level of fraud, or what Senator Chuck Grassley correctly stated was “institutional corruption.”
From the outside, in the view of ordinary Americans, the FBI is an agency who protects the country from threats. However, this is an incorrect way to look at the institutional objective. The FBI only protects threats to DC, not to the nation.
This is a very good discussion. Gaetz was a member of Congress at the time and had first-hand experience with Brennan and other key players.
My understanding is this case is going to be much bigger than what has been revealed so far.
Gabbard hints at this by saying, ‘We’re going to continue to investigate… including election integrity’.
Readers of this site know the 2020 election (and many others) was stolen.
I can read the tea leaves and so can you.
There is a high probability Gabbard is building and revealing this ‘treasonous conspiracy’ case in chronological order.
The conspiracy starts with Obama ordering the fraudulent document.
After the immediate coup during Trump’s first presidency and other malfeasances against Trump, the case will move on to the the fraudulent 2020 election; then to the Bidden puppet regime, most likely controlled by Obama and his co-conspirators.
The case involves legacy media to this day and, in truth, almost certainly foreign governments and intelligence services.
By making it a criminal conspiracy case, Bondi will be able to use evidence from ten years ago, since by law it is all admissible in court; it is all connected.
That’s how conspiracies work and that’s how you prove them. ABN
Official claim that Putin “aspired” to help Trump was based on four pieces of evidence, all bogus, even “ridiculous,” according to long-suppressed report just released by DNI Tulsi Gabbard
The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment concluding that Russian President Vladimir Putin “developed a clear preference” for Donald Trump and “aspired to help his chances of victory” is revealed in a report released this morning by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard to have been based on four pieces of evidence. One was the Steele Dossier. The surprise is that the other three were even less credible, each included over objections of the report’s CIA authors.
The first item was a “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment” of one sentence that the report’s five CIA authors read “five ways” and initially left out, only to have Director John Brennan order it back in. The second item was an email with “no date, no identified sender, no clear recipient, and no classification.” The third was supposedly backed by “liaison,” diplomatic, and press reporting, as well as signals intelligence (SIGINT), except the “SIGINT” didn’t mention Trump, the “liaison reporting” didn’t mention Trump and was from 2014, and the “diplomatic and media” reporting was a post-election review by a U.S. Ambassador citing a Russian pundit who said Putin and Trump should “work together like businessmen.” This was “evidence” that Putin “developed a clear preference” for Trump.
All three reports weren’t just unsourced and unreliable, but discarded fictions pulled out of the CIA’s trash heap. “They manipulated the manipulations,” is how ODNI Deputy Chief of Staff Alexa Henning put it.
The Russia Hoax ‘collusion delusion’ was exposed a long time ago, but now is supported by more evidence based on IC documents and the imprimatur of the DNI, Tulsi Gabbard.
This is potentially the biggest case in American political history.
My understanding is this ‘treasonous conspiracy’ does not end with these four pieces of evidence. It is going to extend to the even more serious 2020 election theft and beyond. ABN
Main Justice has announced the formation of a DOJ strike force to assemble and assess the evidence provided by Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, against former intelligence and government officials.
This will require the DOJ to take a new approach, extracting information from multiple silos and then overlaying context to the content therein.
That’s essentially the new approach that DNI Gabbard has taken to break down the silo defenses, and this is the first time since I’ve been outlining how they self-protect that someone (DNI) has actually done the extracting and cross-referencing.
Dept of Justice – WASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Justice announced the formation of a Strike Force to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and investigate potential next legal steps which might stem from DNI Gabbard’s disclosures.
This Department takes alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with the utmost seriousness.
Upon the formation of the Strike Force, Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated:
“The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.” (LINK)
Don’t underestimate how radical and challenging this type of an approach is going to be.
OIG Michael Horowitz never could attempt it (not authorized), SC John Durham was not permitted to do it (not authorized); the House Select Sub-Committee on Govt Weaponization ran away with hair on fire at even the suggestion of doing it (ask me how I know), and no modern internal investigative unit has ever been allowed to extract national security information from multiple IC institutions, and review it in context.
The DC intel silos are built so their lack of sharing creates a natural defense mechanism; there is no cross-reference capability. DNI Tulsi Gabbard has the unique ability -due to her position- of reaching into each IC silo regardless of their effort to stop her. That’s what has led to this point.
If the DOJ is successful, things could change; but that’s a very big ‘if’.
The entire mechanism of the USIC, led by defenses from the Senate Intel Committee (Cotton), will do everything to stop any internal extraction and review of their silo information. “National security” claims will run rampant. This will be a heavy lift requiring Executive Office support and coordination at every level.
Very serious lines were crossed by the perps. Their actions were treasonous.
At some point lines like these have to be enforced.
The line-crossing was a slippery slope which began before Obama and got worse during his term.
He is the one who turned the Patriot Act against US citizens and his political opponents.
I doubt Obama will be prosecuted for his role in the coup d’état, but punishing lesser actors may send nearly as valuable a message to federal employees if not to the American public.
If Bondi leaves this ‘file’ on her desk, she will become as a traitor herself. ABN
I am hoping all of this will lead to us finding out who was controlling Obama. He was groomed from childhood for his role and surely was following instructions given by someone. Some are saying Obama has a ”kill switch’ which he will use if he gets seriously busted. I hope he does have that switch because it will reveal plenty, maybe including who his bosses are. ABN
American Buddhist Net 