@stkirsch
@BretWeinstein
@EricRWeinstein
@RWMaloneMD
According to ancient Jewish law if a panel of the Sanhedrin (23 Jewish judges) unanimously find a defendant guilty of murder then they must acquit.
The CDC ACIP voted 14-0 without discussion or having read the evidence.
The underlying assumption behind the "Sanhedrin rule" is that, in this situation, the Sanhedrin’s judgement may be systematically biased, and hence the judgements may be dependant, one on another, rather than each judgement produced independently.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/live-mtg-2021-08-30.html
Hence a 14-0 judgement should, logically, using Bayesian analysis, increase your belief that the CDC ACIP decision was systematically biased.
Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince | Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (http://royalsocietypublishing.org)
Originally tweeted by Prof Martin Neil (@MartinNeil9) on September 4, 2021.
American Buddhist Net 