On ‘freedom of speech but not reach’

Exactly right. This same militaristic logic has also been used in destroying individuals in America in a decades-long infiltration and takeover of major American institutions. Besides reputation destruction, educational misdirection, jail-bait traps, and more, many talented American and European young men and boys have been physically disabled in clandestine attacks. This has caused natural leaders to fail to live up to their natural potential, thus demoralizing those who know them. As one informant said to me, ‘They will still be leaders but they will lead people in wrong directions. We want to make examples of people like that, discredit them entirely.’ The online versions of this strategy, now backed by AI, on the one hand may be more effective but on the other may alert far more people to what is being done to the West. When individuals are physically attacked and harmed (poison, psychosurgery, aural damage, etc), it’s hard for most to figure out what happened. When huge swaths of the population are muted or silenced it’s easier to see. What I am saying here is the kind of speech they want out of reach because they know it is true. If I were wrong, why would they bother? ABN

Leave a comment