…The Jewish Question, simply explained, consists of two enquiries: Do Jews possess an excessive influence in their host societies and, if so, what should be done about it? Most commentaries on the subject have focussed on the first question, leading the scholar John Klier to remark on one occasion that the assessment and critique of Jewish influence has throughout history been predominantly an intellectual pursuit. However, in pushing back against the taboo, even via the modest pursuit of research and the dissemination of one’s findings, one engages in activism of a sort. Indeed, one cannot expect to formulate a response to a problem if one cannot first convince others that a problem exists. The essence of the Jewish Question is therefore the argument that Jews do enjoy an excessive influence in their host societies, and that this excessive influence, for a large number of reasons, is highly problematic for those societies. These problems straddle all spheres of society — the cultural, the economic, and the political.
link
The linked article provides a concise outline of Jewish history in Western Europe and is well-worth reading for that. It fizzles when it gets to Eastern Europe and the present day. ABN
UPDATE: A rebuttal or next step in the argument linked above.
“Do Jews possess an excessive influence in their host societies”
This question is in fact a red herring that obfuscates the real issue.
Whether or not Jews have excessive influence is actually not even a question since the answer is obviously yes. But because the answer is so obviously yes debating it drives sane gentiles crazy and delights Jews. The Jews will counter that they have worked hard to attain their influence. Even non-Jews will come to their defense and say it’s their high IQ. Jews will whine about antisemitism being at the root of people’s objection to their influence. The debate always goes nowhere. Leaving disenfranchised gentiles pulling out their hairs. In the end we’re always back to square one.
That is because the basic question is wrong.
You see the problem is not whether Jews have excessive influence. The problem is what they DO with their influence.
Jewish influence drives our nations into wars. Jewish influence floods our countries with third world “refugees.” Jewish influence brings transexuals into our elementary schools to teach our children about anal sex. Jewish influence has turned our currency into a massive debt slavery system. Jewish influence has degraded our arts and literature. Jewish influence gave us the Frankfurt School and Murder Incorporated. Should I mention 911 and the death of JFK.
But we never even get to discuss any of these issues because to do so is “antisemitic.” So we’re stuck on quibbling about whether or not they have influence.
It’s not that Jews have influence. It is what they DO with that influence that has caused problems for these last 2000 years. And that’s what we need to talk to them about.
link
I pretty much agree with the main thrust of this comment. No matter who is in control—and there will always be someone—they must at least do a good job. They must at least allow the people they govern to thrive. A thriving Western civilization can afford a selfish elite, even benefit from it, if they at least ensure that the society that supports them is healthy and well-run. This is not the case today and for decades in USA, Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand. Instead, these regions are dying due to severe parasitic infestation. One parasite supports another, and thus the parasitic strategy overwhelms an entire civilization. ABN
American Buddhist Net 