I do not believe that global pandemics of acute respiratory illnesses are immunologically possible — Mike Yeadon

1. I do not believe that global pandemics of acute respiratory illnesses are immunologically possible.

2. Even if they were possible, we have not experienced a very serious event, allegedly since 1918 (“Spanish Flu Pandemic”). It turns out even that is either faked or tremendously exaggerated, largely quite recently (the last 20-25 years). So why even the claimed need to transfer sovereignty to a central body?

3. Imagine despite the foregoing there was a “genuine, severe pandemic”. Let us compare outcomes in the current context and under the WHO treaty.

a. This is by definition a novel situation. Nobody knows the best course of action. This means WHO definitely doesn’t know. So why in the world would you want them to be deciding things?

b. When humans have faced novel challenges in the past, we have a brilliant system to determine the best response as well as to learn what’s definitely not a good idea. It’s that groups locally decide what’s best for them and this is communicated dynamically. We’ll benefit from rapid, empirical evidence linking interventions and outcomes. If there’s an obviously best response, everyone will them learn of this, together with all the suboptimal things to avoid.

c. “Those who would exchange liberty for safety will get neither liberty nor safety”. Even if a 3rd party could claim it knew best, I’d still prefer each nation to make its own decisions and face their electorates in the next elections.

4. Now let’s examine what could go wrong. I am if the view that this is solely about control and malign misuse of the power to control an entire planet. If I’m right, soon after these instruments come into force, an event will be said to have occurred which triggers the new powers. WHO, now effectively World King, can order whatever they want. Lockdowns, mandated testing, isolation and even medical treatment (including especially mRNA based injections).

link