UPDATE: This is a very good talk by Cummins. He provides a basic overview that many people will be able to understand and agree with because they can see it with their own eyes. He skillfully and deliberately avoids going too deep into the weeds or into subjects which can be divisive. It is this kind of overview that we need today because this kind of thinking is most able to unite large numbers of people to resist what our ruling elites are doing. I have not heard anyone else provide such a clear summary. Those of us who understand the Western world is facing annihilation can most effectively unite behind this basic outline provided by Cummins. Is it Jews at the top or the USIC or the British royal family or European nobles and old money who are trying to seize control of the West and through that the world are not matters we all need to spend all of our time on. We will be much more effective if we encourage uniting around a general recognition of the disasters that have happened and why we must prevent them from continuing. ABN
A practical outline on how to save the West from becoming an ‘ant farm’ — a talk with Ivor Cummins
American Buddhist Net 
I disagree in that I think it’s critical that we know who the enemy is. A recent email I sent to a friend:
I’ve been immersed in the question, who are they? I reread Creature several times and got all his source material. He uses two main books: Eustace Mullins’s Secrets of the Federal Reserve for his central bank information. And he uses Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope for his assessment of the ‘Hidden Hand.’
Quigley identifies the Round Table Groups as the ‘hidden hand.’ And he claims to know them socially when he wrote his book in 1971. He says, “and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments.” I believe that it’s certain that the ‘papers and secret records’ he examined were Round Table records.
However, that careful rereading revealed a most interesting comment previously unnoticed:
“the greatly reduced activities of the organization have been exercised largely through the Editorial Committee of The Round Table magazine”
SO, in 1971 the Round Table activities have been greatly reduced…
And on top of that mild indication there is a more direct statement in Tragedy and Hope:
” It was this group of people, whose wealth and influence so exceeded their experience and understanding, who provided much of the frame-work of influence which the Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers took over in the United States in the 1930’s.”
WHAT? In Tragedy and Hope Quigley said that the Round Table network was taken over in the 1930s by “Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers.” I say, that’s a really big WOW for me.
Quigley elaborates upon that passing remark but he does it 10 yrs later when he published The Anglo-American Establishment. It’s a mind numbing review of all the connections among the people behind the Round Table; mostly English with extensive details on social relations, blood relations, bankers, royalty and rich people.
And at the end of book, in the final two pages, he says this (Note: the blow he refers to is the Conservatives losing power in 1945 when Churchill and his entire political party were voted out of office and replaced by the Labour Party):
Since this blow, the Milner Group has been in eclipse, and it is not clear what has been happening. Its control of The Times, of The Round Table, of Chatham House, of the Rhodes Trust, of All Souls, and of Oxford generally has continued but has been used without centralized purpose or conviction. Most of the original members of the Group have retired from active affairs; the newer recruits have not the experience or the intellectual conviction, or the social contacts, which allowed the older members to wield such great power. The disasters into which the Group directed British policy in the years before 1940 are not such as to allow their prestige to continue undiminished. In imperial affairs, their policies have been largely a failure, with Ireland gone, India divided and going, Burma drifting away, and even South Africa more distant than at any time since 1910. In foreign policy their actions almost destroyed western civilization, or at least the European center of it. The Times has lost its influence; The Round Table seems lifeless. Far worse than this, those parts of Oxford where the Group’s influence was strongest have suffered a disastrous decline.
And the final line of the book:
It would seem that the great idealistic adventure which began with Toynbee and Milner in 1875 had slowly ground its way to a finish of bitterness and ashes.
So in 1981 Quigley declares the (American) Round Table Group dead during the 1930s and dead in England in 1945. If we are to believe Quigley then it was “Communist sympathizers and fellow travelers” who wielded the (American) power previously held & exercised by the Round Table Group. If they came to power during the 1930s they have had nearly 100 yrs to promote their agenda. That lines up nicely with what we actually see in our lifetime; the continual rise of communism (now called socialism) in America.
I feel like I can close the book on Griffin and Quigley. They’ve both provided invaluable information about the hidden hand but never got close to saying who they are. We have to look to more current events, events since the end of WWII, to try to discern their action and identities.
the problem of knowing who they are extends even to the top. there probably is an inner circle of people who know or believe they are at the top; and we can tell this from how well policies and mind-controlled beliefs are orchestrated across the West; but how can even that inner circle be certain there are not traitors in their midst? no king is ever safe, and this is a major reason the top keeps grasping for more power. the more power they can aggrandize the more secure they feel because their success is a kind of proof that there is no one above them. this also explains why they are so violent and cannot be content with ‘mere’ control of USA or the entire West