People get upset for not accepting the official government narrative of Kirk’s death – as if questioning a government that has done nothing but lie is somehow disrespectful. If anything, blindly accepting the cute gift-wrapped narrative is. Charlie was a man who encouraged questioning. Let’s walk through some of the contradictions and questions.

I doubt most know anything about him or the other guy unfortunately. Charlie started to wander off the plantation. He was becoming a liability. This was a warning to others.

Until these questions are answered, I don’t believe one word of it. The writing on the bullet casings and finding out he lives with a trans is a nice and easy deflection. This story has more holes than a loaf of sourdough. Expect another Butler type “investigation”. And they have already planted the seed the kid is suicidal. Jus sayin.

Ian Smith, Sr.
@iansmithfitness
People get upset for not accepting the official government narrative of Kirk’s death – as if questioning a government that has done nothing but lie is somehow disrespectful. If anything, blindly accepting the cute gift-wrapped narrative is. Charlie was a man who encouraged questioning.
Let’s walk through some of the contradictions and questions.
 
1) Discord evidence.
Officials claim digital chats were found mapping the plan, but Discord says it’s not on their servers. So where is it? Screenshots? Forensics? Chain of custody? If a planner is smart enough to scout/escape, why leave a confession on a public platform?
 
2) No ballistics and caliber.
We still don’t have a lab match between the rifle and the bullet that killed Charlie. Until there’s rifling/toolmark confirmation, everything else is noise. Officials can end this instantly with the fired bullet’s measured lands/grooves and a simple one-page lab prelim. Why haven’t they?
 
3) Rifle fairy tale.
Video shows the runner without a rifle at several points. So he had to disassemble it. Are we supposed to believe he then re-assembled it just to dump it in the woods?
 
4) Family contradiction.
Grandmother claims nobody in the family is a leftist and she’s never seen him touch a gun. That clashes with the leftist narrative and the story of a calm, competent shooter.
 
5) Confession theater.
Shooter executes the plan under pressure, escapes, then immediately tells on himself via dad/minister. You don’t pull off a precise shot and then sprint home for a group confession circle.
 
6) Decoys.
Two decoy arrests/contacts the same night. If this was a lone impulsive student, why the extra moving parts? Who coordinated this?
 
7) The plane.
A private jet near the scene “disappears” from public tracking right after the shooting. We’re told “nothing to see here.” Cool, then release the ADS-B raw logs, tower audio, and a simple flight timeline.
 
8) Security.
Clips show odd hand signals and movements around Charlie seconds before the shot. If that’s normal, let’s see an official breakdown of who those people were and what they were signaling.
 
9) Motive tangle.
Information suggests Charlie had public disagreements with major donors and was pivoting harder to America-First fights. Ask the most basic question: cui bono? Who benefits from the story we’re being sold?
 
10) Wardrobe shift.
Rooftop figure is head-to-toe black. The suspect appears in different clothing. If the shooter changed, where are the discarded clothes? Recovered? Tested for GSR/DNA? Logged? Show the evidence tags.
 
11) Rooftop access unclear.
Which door, hatch, or ladder? Card swipe? Alarm trip? Camera angles? If the route is “known,” release the complete path with timestamps. A campus roof isn’t a bus stop.
 
12) Camera gaps.
We get a few convenient snippets but no uninterrupted multi-angle sequence from roof to woods. Where’s the full pull from all cams? Redactions can protect privacy but cuts protect narratives.
 
13) Forensics.
No GSR [Gun Shot Residue] results from the suspect’s hands/clothes. No latent prints/DNA announced on the rifle, scope, or towel. No matching shoe prints/soil transfer from the roof. These are day-one tests. Where are they?
 
14) Geodata.
If the FBI has the right man, they have his location history, pings, and IP logs. Publish the warrant returns (redacted) that place his device at the roof and along the dump route.
 
15) Backpack & gear.
Backpack color/cut in roof footage vs later images of the suspect aren’t a clean match. Was the pack recovered? Contents? Gloves? Optic cover? Sling? Any of it booked into evidence?
 
16) Media choreography.
The most cinematic detail (the father/minister pipeline) was rolled out before forensics. That primes the public with a tidy moral arc while the science lags. Classic play.
 
If the FBI has the shooter, show the receipts. Not some “I’ll see you in Valhalla” bullshit. Until then this case is a puzzle with pieces hammered to fit. We don’t need another polished narrative. We need proof.
11:30 AM · Sep 13, 2025
·
117.3K
Views

link