Medieval England had laws dictating who could eat what based on social class.
Nobility: Venison, beef, mutton, game birds. The fattiest cuts. Roasted whole.
Peasants: Barley, oats, peas, beans. Meat maybe twice a year at festivals.
This wasn’t preference. This was LAW. You could be punished for eating above your station.
The aristocracy understood that diet determines class more than birth. Feed someone like a peasant long enough, they become one. Weak bones, poor teeth, stunted growth, no energy for rebellion.
Feed someone like a lord and suddenly they start acting like one. Strong, aggressive, capable of demanding more.
Now we don’t need sumptuary laws. We just price meat out of reach, run fear campaigns about cholesterol, and convince people that quinoa is premium nutrition.
Different century. Same suppression. Better branding.
This is where the insulting phrase, the little people, comes from.
Weakening the people through diet, culling their herd by killing or maiming their strongest; poisoning their wells, the King’s Spies… these were all methods of total control, among many others.
The little people were (and still are) punished harshly for speech and behavior that threatens to liberate them from slavery.
Elites today oppose free speech because it will undermine their evil control of the human population.
They support mass immigration invasion because it dilutes their herds of little people, weakens them, forces them to succumb.
Today’s little people are now diabetic and obese from bad diets and this was not by accident. ABN
American Buddhist Net 