Narcissistic vengefulness. They view the exposure of that text thread as the beginning of the public recognition that Charlie was betrayed.
It was the launch pad for people with common sense asking “why hide the fact that Charlie’s views were changing about Israel, unless it’s somehow relevant to his assassination?”
“Why didn’t Turning Point, or Erika back Candace up when she told the truth?”
It was the first crack in their narrative. Were they not guilty, they would be tremendously grateful to the people who exposed the truth about Charlie’s final days.
As I have said many times, Turning Point execs possess a dangerously low emotional IQ. They don’t know how innocent parties behave. They can’t even imitate innocence. Anger towards Joe Kent makes them look worse. Were I running their PR, I would have had Joe Kent on the Charlie Kirk show. Instead, they send Israeli attack dogs on him.
Why hide the fact that Charlie’s views were changing about Israel, unless it’s somehow relevant to his assassination? — Candace Owens
American Buddhist Net 