These hidden mafias partner in ways that nations wouldn’t, and they fight over things we don’t expect—because they aren’t nations. They don’t care about us, or our national identities, except as tools. Tools that are valuable, but in the end, disposable. Our rights are obstacles.
They manipulate us into doing their bidding. Most visible activity of these mafias is done by people who have no idea what they’ve partnered with. That element of the game is messy, but not difficult. They shape our understanding and create niches which people discover and fill.
This is why our social media environment is such a disaster. The generality of our awareness must be kept below a threshold. If too many people become aware of too much, the control structure breaks. The bots, sock puppets and useful idiots are a vital asset of these mafias.
Our perceptions can be shaped because our public truth-seeking institutions are all compromised.
That isn’t an accident.
Those outside the institutions who have the ability to seek and find truth are punished. Those who persist in spite of the punishment, find their reputations attacked. It produces ‘managed helplessness’ of the citizenry.
We’re forced into artificial factions that don’t get along
That’s what I think.
It wouldn’t matter except I’m smart…
How to describe Jewish Supremacy without saying Jewish Supremacy. Jewish Supremacists always work every side of every issue. The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves — Vladimir Lenin, who was part Jewish and led the super-Jewish Bolshevik slaughter of Russian Christians. I do not know enough about Bret Weinstein to say which side he is really on. But I do know enough about Jewish Supremacists to know that they always lie. Their super aggressive behavior affects all Jews and leaves the rest of us in the position of not being able to trust any Jews. Both Jews and Muslims follow a fundamental religious tenet that lying to outsiders is not only permitted but the right thing to do. It is held in high esteem. Is Bret doing that? There is no way to know. He rose to prominence quickly and remains near the top. He’s a major influencer. How many of them can we trust, especially those backed by Jewish money? Not many, probably none at all. ABN
American Buddhist Net 
The article raises the question of whether Bret Weinstein’s influence should make us more careful about examining the limits of his arguments.
A more precise criticism concerns his treatment of the origin of life. Weinstein recognizes that heredity is the threshold that turns ordinary physical selection into biological evolution. Yet he often invokes Darwinian evolution as the ultimate explanation for biological complexity and intelligence without explaining how the first hereditary, self-reproducing system arose.
That distinction matters. Evolution can explain how living systems change once replication, heredity, variation, and selection already exist. It does not, by itself, explain how nonliving chemistry first became capable of those processes.
For a prominent evolutionary thinker who speaks confidently about creation, intelligence, and ultimate causation, this is not a minor missing detail. It is the central unresolved problem. His influence makes the omission more consequential because many listeners may come away believing that evolution and the origin of evolution are the same question.
I explore this further here:
Life Against Entropy: Cloning, the Origin of Life, and Gurdjieff’s Creation Story
https://tonylutz.com/intelligence/something-else-entirely/612-612