If women were in charge of most states, the world would not last long. Women are too volatile, too personal and emotional ——- exactly the qualities that make for bad diplomacy.
This trait is exacerbated in a Western world committed to liberalism in geopolitics, rather than realism.
Liberalism seeks to “fight the last war” to make the world safe for democracy” —- whereas realism, a manly perspective, accepts the realities of great power politics and the balance of power doctrine.
It understands that bigger nations get to have more privileges than small nations, and that there is no such thing as equality of rights in international relations.
He may be right. I take the male-female differences as about 15% on either side for many determinations of this sort. It is decidedly true that world history is filled with bad leaders. And it is also true today that there are few if any really good female leaders in anything. When they gang up and form gynogangs, as they have done in American universities and the EU, the results are worse than death: stifling low-brow ‘ideological thinking’ so bad it appears designed to turn away best minds. Plenty of men participate in nonsense like the above but that’s where the 15% comes in. Duchesne frequently makes the point that Western liberalism—which sees all human beings as equal and the same—is a dagger in the brain of the West. If we do not adapt to reality soon, and the odds are not good, we are done for as a people. White Western people will disappear from the earth due to their failure to protect themselves against their own ingrained ideals and the parasites who have learned to exploit those ideals. Frederiksen is a clueless fool to talk like that and she is not the only one who is doing it. ABN
American Buddhist Net 