Richard Gage, Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth – Fight Back Ep. 59

~ ABN

I have not had time to watch this but am posting because it’s probably interesting and 9/11 deserves to be kept alive. It too was a kind of coup d’état as it ushered in the Patriot Act, the War on Terror, the Iraq War and the eventual coup d’état against Trump that’s in the news today. ABN

UPDATE: Well-worth viewing. This is a first-rate overview of 9/11, Gaza, wars for Israel, and the covid plandemic. The focus is 9/11. Gage is very good at explaining briefly what he believes happened and the evidence supporting his views. This video is very good for sending to anyone interested and anyone who still does not understand the depth and breadth of what is happening in our world. ABN

Unknown's avatar

Published by ABN

3 thoughts on “Richard Gage, Founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth – Fight Back Ep. 59”

  1. Richard Gage is the very definition of a limited hangout. His theory or claim is severely flawed and he refuses to debate or even address the holes in his argument. His main claim that nano thermite was used because traces of iron oxide and aluminum were found in dust does not stand up to scrutiny. Given the composition of the buildings it would be shocking to NOT find those things in dust, it’s not proof that thermite of any kind was used. His views do not address:

    1. Commercial airplanes cannot travel 500+ mph at sea level, airplanes did not and could not have hit the towers.
    2. The lack of debris from the towers and building 7. The debris pile was around 12% of what it should have been given the volume of the buildings.
    3. The lack of damage to surrounding structures. A true controlled demolition would have caused enormous damage to surrounding buildings and this was not seen.
    4. Thermite is fairly unpredictable, the coordination (and luck) involved to use thermite for 3 controlled demolitions defies odds.
    5. The lack of a seismic signature consistent with what would be expected for these buildings to have collapsed due to controlled demolition.
    6. The bathtub, holding back the Hudson River, was not damaged. If these buildings had collapsed due to controlled demolition the bathtub would have been obliterated and lower Manhattan and all subway lines would have been flooded.

    That’s off the top of my head, I’m sure I’m leaving several things out.

    Reply

    1. I respect what you are saying and believe you may be right. Your comment is a valuable and worth considering.

      That said, most of the world and USA audience does not even know the basics of 9/11. There’s an old saying — ‘don’t let perfection be the enemy of pragmatics’, or something like that.

      9/11 could have happened due to mini-nukes or targeted energy weapons. But most of all we need people to grasp the basic story and see how it relates to everything else happening in our world today.

      Gage is folding much more into the 9/11 story, making it relevant to people who were not even alive in 2001.

      I welcome your input and encourage you to provide any links you think people should see. My basic position on many issues is we have to work with the people we have, be it Trump, Gabbard, Rubio, Gage, or whomever.

      I was pleasantly surprised at what a good job Shields did in this interview. It’s good material and will have a good effect on anyone who watches it.

      If you have not already, I hope you will watch the video and appreciate the larger picture they present and the value of that.

      Reply

Leave a comment