A preliminary military investigation has determined that the United States was responsible for a missile strike on an Iranian elementary school that killed 175 people, most of them children.
Donald Trump had previously blamed the Iranian regime for bombing a school filled with young girls with an American Tomahawk missile on February 28 during the first day of Operation Epic Fury.
The ongoing investigation determined that US forces made the mistake while launching strikes on a nearby Iranian military base, which the school building was once part of.
Officers at US Central Command decided to strike the school using outdated data provided by the Defense Intelligence Agency, one of the premier US intelligence agencies.
The deadly operation on Shajarah Tayyebeh elementary school, which was full of children, is considered one of the most devastating US military errors in decades.
The FBI alerted California law enforcement to potential Iranian drone strikes on the West Coast in retaliation for the US war against the Islamic Republic.
‘Iran allegedly aspired to conduct a surprise attack using unmanned aerial vehicles from an unidentified vessel off the coast of the United State Homeland, specifically against unspecified targets in California, in the event that the US conducted strikes against Iran,’ the alert obtained by ABC News said.
‘We have no additional information on the timing, method, target, or perpetrators of this alleged attack,’ the FBI update continued.
Public opinion matters. Public opinion stopped the monkeypox bs. The more the public knows, the more reliable its opinions are. Elections matter, but it is public opinion which fuels them. Public opinion strongly favors IDs for voters. Pragmatism enjoins us to support and encourage valid public opinions. The recent ‘rise in antisemitism’ is nothing more than rising public awareness of how crazy and violent Jewish Supremists are. It is because of them and them only that we are on the verge of WW3 and the use of nuclear weapons. ABN
Late night March 10th into the early morning today — Wave 37. Was one of the heaviest waves yet for ballistic missiles into Israel.
IRGC called it their “most intense and heaviest operation” of the entire war — three hours of continuous, multi-layered strikes using the Kheibar Shekan, Qadr, and Khorramshahr ballistic missiles. One-tonne warheads.
Erbil. The US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain. Military centres in Be’er Ya’akov and Tel Aviv. Nearly half of the 300 ballistic missiles fired at Israel carried cluster bomb warheads — each one scattering dozens of submunitions across a ten-kilometre radius. They’re hitting both harder and smarter.
Eleven days in. Thirty-seven waves and counting fast. Iran is still escalating not degrading, escalating with its heaviest systems, its largest warheads, its longest-range missiles. Channel 12 News in Israel reported on March 2nd that Iran was virtually out of both launchers and AD batteries which was echoed by Western client media.
The IDF told you the interceptions were holding and yet we saw the 4th night in a row of iron Sieve (dome), Arrow 3 and what remains of 2 working THAAD systems looking like they were in a deep coma.
Meanwhile the Bahrain fuel terminal for the US 5th Fleet is likely still fire, the Israeli Defence Ministry complex has been struck, and Dubai is a ghost town. You were lied to AGAIN.
Iran’s 37th wave of ballistic missile strikes on Israel, launched late March 10 into early 11, 2026, marked the IRGC’s heaviest operation yet, involving three hours of Kheibar Shekan, Qadr, and Khorramshahr missiles with 1-tonne warheads—nearly half carrying cluster munitions scattering submunitions over 10-km radii.
The attack targeted Israeli military sites in Be’er Ya’akov and Tel Aviv, US assets in Erbil and Bahrain’s Fifth Fleet fuel terminal, and caused fires and evacuations in Dubai, contradicting Channel 12’s March 2 report of Iran’s depleted launchers and defenses, as evidenced by video footage of un-intercepted impacts.
In the 11-day Iran-Israel war, interception rates faltered for the fourth night, with Iron Dome, Arrow 3, and THAAD appearing overwhelmed per Reuters imagery of strikes in Yehud; ISW confirms multi-layered barrages, underscoring Iran’s escalation despite US-Israeli counterstrikes.
UPDATE: At some point in this video, all of which is worth watching, Max says both Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are members of the Chabad Messianic cult which believes Rabbi Schneerson will be reborn as the Jewish Messiah once the Third Temple is built in Israel. Max also says some believe Jared Kushner is actually running Trump’s presidency. As we teeter on the precipice of WW3, it must be obvious to all thinking people how powerful, controlling and maniacal Jewish Supremacism is. It is no one other than them who are forcing these events on USA and the world. After destroying Gaza, do they rest and recoup? No, they press on for more death and destruction. None of this helps anyone anywhere, except for some tiny little group of devils living inside their twisted imaginations. ABN
Chabad, a major Hasidic Jewish movement. Chabad, also known as Lubavitch, is a prominent branch of Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) Judaism that emphasizes intellectual study, outreach, and global engagement.
Origin: Founded in 1775 by Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi in Liozno (modern-day Belarus), Chabad takes its name from the Hebrew acronym Chokmah (Wisdom), Binah (Understanding), and Da’at (Knowledge)—reflecting its focus on rational mysticism and Torah scholarship.
Global Presence: Under the leadership of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (the “Rebbe”), who led from 1951 to 1994, Chabad expanded rapidly, establishing over 3,500 institutions in more than 100 countries, including Chabad Houses on college campuses and in remote cities.
Outreach Focus: Unlike many insular Hasidic groups, Chabad is known for its active outreach to unaffiliated and non-observant Jews, offering free services, holiday celebrations, educational programs, and support.
Controversial Beliefs: After Schneerson’s death in 1994, a significant minority of followers believe he was the Messiah—a belief known as Chabad messianism, which remains a point of internal and external debate.
Notable Figures: The movement has been shaped by influential leaders like the “Old Rebbe” (Shneur Zalman) and the “Rebbe” (Schneerson), whose legacy continues to influence global Jewish life.
The Third Temple refers to a hypothetical future temple in Jerusalem that would replace the First and Second Temples, both of which were destroyed—first by the Babylonians in 587 BCE and then by the Romans in 70 CE. It is a central aspiration in Judaism, particularly among Orthodox and some Messianic Jewish communities, who view its construction as a key sign of the coming Messianic Age.
According to Jewish tradition, the Third Temple will be built on the Temple Mount, a site sacred to both Jews and Muslims. This location is currently home to the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, making it one of the most contested religious and political sites in the world.
You want to know why I wasn’t surprised to see Jared Kushner in this picture with Ghislaine? Because sexual blackmail is normal for these people, and they get rewarded for it!
Look at his father. It’s the Epstein playbook.
Charles Kushner, Jared Kushner’ father, pleaded guilty in 2005 for fraud, tax evasion, and witness tampering. Court documents detail how he paid a prostitute $10,000 to lure his brother-in-law (a cooperating witness in the tax probe) to a New Jersey motel, where the encounter was covertly recorded. Kushner then mailed the video to his sister (the witness’s wife) to silence her testimony.
What kind of person does this to their sister?
He served about 14-16 months before release. Kushner was then pardoned by President Trump on December 23, 2020, which cleared his record and allowed him to resume professional activities (he had been disbarred in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania). Trump then nominated him as the U.S. Ambassador to France on November 30, 2024; he was confirmed by the Senate in early 2025 and assumed the role in July 2025.
A primary question about consciousness is “conscious of what?”
What if your consciousness is based on an error?
If you become conscious of the error, you will most likely correct it and thus change your consciousness.
Metacognition is a word that is sometimes used in place of “consciousness.”
Metacognition implies awareness of how our consciousness is functioning.
Buddhist mindfulness can be defined as “active metacognition.” This implies awareness of what is in our consciousness, what the elements of its functioning are in the moment.
Buddhist practice assume that if while being mindful we perceive error in our consciousness, we will correct the error.
Metacognition requires “self-awareness” or “awareness of the functioning of consciousness.” It seems that most people do this better than most animals in most situations.
Metacognition or mindfulness requires training or practice. But training and practice can also be wrong, based on wrong views.
Many forms of selfhood are based on wrong views.
Right mindfulness is used to perceive these mistakes and correct them.
For example, a person can be trained to have an identity. They can practice having this identity and learn the emotions that go along with it.
With wrong training and practice an identity can become explosive, violent, crazy.
This is a major part of what is meant by delusion in Buddhism, having a wrong view about your identity.
Notice, that a person can have a very wrong identity and be fully conscious of it and the world around them without realizing their identity is wrong.
The West has failed to analyze and understand metalevels of interpersonal communication. Our philosophies employ metalevel concepts and vocabularies but have never delved into or properly understood metalevels of interpersonal communication.
This failure to properly understand metalevels of interpersonal communication has very large downstream effects. It has retarded our religious understanding and psychologies, our group formation, our understanding of other groups, and our ability to form profound interpersonal relationships.
The basis of this claim is that when interpersonal language is deeply restricted—as ours is by this massive hole in Western philosophy—all other forms of language use are negatively affected. When metalevels of interpersonal communication are limited, so is almost everything else.
I believe our philosophers never went there for the same reason no one elsewhere has either—analysis of interpersonal metacognitive language and thought goes against a primitive human instinct to not question others too closely, especially in real-time and about usage and meaning.
The few areas of Western endeavor that have not been hobbled in this way are science, technology, and to some extent economics and politics. This is because these areas by definition must deal with metalevel concepts and thus are very capable of understanding and manipulating them, but only in their own self-described contexts. They are successful because they are practically engaged with the real-world.
In contrast, Western religions, psychologies, group formations, and intergroup communication are so severely hobbled by limited metacognitive understanding, they are all but forced to use rigid definitions of what their metacognitive levels are. Thus Western psychologies are theoretical, religions are dogmatic, group formations are formal at best or ideologically tribal, indicating the need to enforce metacognitive language and concepts rather than analyze or discuss them.
Wittgenstein came close to understanding the problem but did not provide a solution or seem to see that there is one. I hope readers of this site understand that FIML is both the solution to this problem and the best way to personally experience and come to grips with how very serious it is. ABN
Retroactive revision means changing what you said. Anyone can do it but retroactive revision is especially designed for FIML partners. Partners can use it whenever they feel a statement they have made has boxed them into a corner or is making the conversation take a turn they had wanted to avoid.
For example, you say “I like XYZ cars the best.” What you actually meant is I very much like XYZ cars. Your partner starts talking as if you really mean you like them the best. This is a very simple example, but sometimes it can be difficult to keep things on track even with a simple mix-up like this.
If you feel your partner is wasting time talking about the good points of other cars to show you that XYZ may not be the best, just say you want to retroactively revise what you first said. Say: “I want to retroactively revise what I said. I want to change my initial statement to I very much like XYZ cars. I didn’t actually mean I like them the best of all cars; I was exaggerating, I guess.” Your partner will understand that you were using words loosely and that they need not take your original statement literally. They will change their tack and your conversation will become more in keeping with what you really think and feel.
Once learned, that technique will give both partners a lot of freedom. It’s relaxing to know you can easily change what you have said to be more in line with the thinking that has evolved in your mind since you made your initial statement.
As with most FIML techniques, FIML partners should do retroactive revisions the moment they feel that their partner may have misunderstood them. If it turns out your partner did not misunderstand, there is still a major benefit for both partners because the mistaken impression you had about your partner will not cause any further confusion for either of you.