Micro FIML practice is basic to all FIML practice.
(A description of micro FIML can be found here: How to do FIML.)
Basic or micro FIML provides a sturdy foundation for many other kinds of interpersonal discussions. This is so because basic FIML makes partners confident that they can say what they think without fearing that their partner will significantly misunderstand them.
Why is that? The reason is if your partner interprets what you have said in a palpable—and especially a negative—way, they will ask you about it. Once they have asked you, you can clarify what you meant, change it, expand on it, explain it, or do anything else you want with it as long as you are being honest.
Basic FIML explicates all new clouds that appear on the horizon. If your partner speaks or communicates in a way that causes a small cloud to appear on your horizon and you have time, bring it up immediately using the basic FIML technique linked above. If you don’t have time to bring it up immediately, do it later when you do have time if the cloud is still there. Even if the cloud is gone, it can still be interesting to bring it up later because you can discuss the incident and learn more about yourselves from that. Very small incidents are often the most interesting because data points are clear and strong emotions are not likely to be aroused.
No FIML partner should ever carry around a shadow of misgiving or negativity about their partner without saying something about it. This is where meso and macro levels of FIML come into play.
Meso and macro FIML come into play when you discover that even though you have been doing basic FIML perfectly and dealt with every cloud that appeared on your horizon, still there is a shadow or haze developing in your mind.
You can’t remember when it started or how it started, but you know it is there.
If you have been doing basic FIML and are reasonably skilled in it, you should be able to bring up the matter of a gathering haze in your mind and clear it with your partner. Maybe you partner is spending too much time away from you or too close to you. Maybe you are starting to feel weird about something they keep saying. No single incident of their saying whatever it is has bothered you enough to mention it, but they keep saying it and that is getting to you. Once you notice anything like that, just bring it up and discuss it at a meso level while relying on basic micro FIML practice to steer you toward a good resolution that works for both of you.
Another example of a meso discussion might be something like: you are a bit tired, your partner says something and you respond in what seems a pleasant way to you and they respond to that in a way that seems sharp or restrictive to you. Since you are tired, you don’t do basic FIML at the right moment but instead respond sharply to what you had perceived as their sharpness.
If your partner questions you on that and/or if you notice it yourself, just do a meso FIML discussion that brings in all of the factors you are aware of. Your habit of doing basic FIML will make it much easier to have conversations on meso or macro levels than if you had never done basic FIML at all.
A macro level FIML discussion might entail a growing shift in your understanding of any macro subject—science, religion, philosophy, politics, etc.
As with meso discussions, macro discussions will be much easier and more enjoyable if partners know how to do basic FIML.
Basic FIML solves most communication problems by helping partners be honest with each other in ways that are helpful and productive without being phony. Basic FIML also helps partners sail past the many minor snags that can occur in conversations, such as quibbling over word choices, minor details, tone of voice, gestures, and so on.
This happens because basic FIML will already have provided many examples of small snags and how to overcome them. It does take some practice to get to this point, but it is not much harder than learning to sew or make pizza. Requires some work and there are better and worse results, but once you get going the benefits should be clear enough to keep you going.
In my view, FIML will not work for partners only if a misinterpretation is not addressed, not honestly addressed, or not substantially addressed from the micro level on up. If you always jump in at meso and macro levels, you will almost certainly cause more problems than you will solve.
US Senator Susan Collins and her Treasurer Elizabeth T. McCandless caught Smurfing $4,428,495.00 into her campaign committee. This is criminal money laundering.
One of their victims is Antony Taquey of North Carolina. We are supposed to believe Taquey made 38,967 contributions totaling $608,342.
Of these, 253 went to Susan Collins, totaling $5,395. But hold on, the truth is Taquey did not make these contributions. He is 72 years old and is having his identity stolen by Collings and her Treasurer McCandless. That’s also elderly financial abuse.
Look at the chart of Taquey, on June 24, 2021 we are supposed to believe he made 468 contributions totaling $17,197. Each contribution is time/date stamped and assigned its own unique transaction code by the FEC.
American chess grandmaster Daniel Naroditsky had several drugs in his system when he unexpectedly died, according to a recently released toxicology report.
Naroditsky was just 29 years old when he was found dead on his couch at his home in Charlotte, North Carolina, by friend and fellow grandmaster Oleksandr Bortnyk, who went to check on him on October 19.
At the time, police confirmed to the Daily Mail that Naroditsky may have committed suicide or accidentally overdosed, as they did not find signs of foul play or criminal activity.
According to a toxicology report by the North Carolina Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that was obtained by NBC News, Naroditsky had methamphetamine, amphetamine, 7-hydroxymitragynine and mitragynine in his system when he died.
The first two chemicals are synthetic stimulants, while the latter two are the primary active chemical compounds found in Kratom, a plant native to Southeast Asia with opioid-like effects.
Official footage shows the next gen “New SSM” (Island Defense Missile) spiraling in its final attack run to confuse and evade shipborne close in defense guns at the last second. What makes it dangerous:
Donald Trump today accused Sir Keir Starmer of ‘giving away’ Diego Garcia to Mauritius ‘for no reason whatsoever’ in an ‘act of great stupidity’ that he believes justifies his demand to seize Greenland.
The US president said that ‘there is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness’ by Britain in the Chagos Islands.
But the UK Government has hit back and insisted that the Chagos deal was backed by their closest allies including the US.
Mr Trump said in a Truth Social post today: ‘Shockingly, our “brilliant” NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
Trump trolled European leaders with an AI image of them looking at a map showing Greenland as US territory before he flew to Davos
In a stunning and rapid strategy to keep the globalists from realizing what he is assembling, it is being reported that President Trump wants the Gaza Board of Peace constitution and remittance agreement signed in Davos. However, as the United Nations, European leaders and traditional globalists who comprise the WEF assembly begin to realize what Trump is putting together, they are getting triggered.
“Hey boss, they’re catching on. Better hurry up”
In essence, as people of self-appointed political importance are starting to realize, President Trump is assembling an entirely new structure for global partnerships that will likely end up with the functional obsolesce of the United Nations. Trump is selecting world leaders through the invite to a global board of peace; Gaza merely represents the initial venue.
One of the key aspects is the new global assembly will each pay their own way. No free riders this time. You want to sit at the big table; join the big club of sovereignty; assemble with a mutually respectful team of action; then pay the entrance fee to attend.
Who/Where/What is the first voice to rise against this global alliance for peace?
“So far, only Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly pushed back against the proposal. While he’s in favor of the Board of Peace as a concept, his office said the make-up of a separate Gaza committee serving under the board, was “not coordinated with Israel and runs contrary to its policy,” after officials from Qatar and Turkey were included.”
Wait, so Israel is not happy…. Not just about Gaza; but about, well, everything this new structure could possibly mean.
Meanwhile, “Argentina’s Javier Milei confirmed he’ll become a founding member and Italy’s Giorgia Meloni has pitched herself as a mediator who is “ready to do our part.””
Can you see it now?
Leftist/Globalist United Nations imperialism is diminished. While a nationalist, respectful sovereign alliance rises.
Realists, let’s enjoy this good news! Something along these lines (something not dominated by Israel) was the original hope for how the Gaza Board of Peace would turn out. Trump appears to be doing that and also taking it global. I hope this works. What a great move! ABN
His shirt movement is difficult to explain with a rifle shot from any angle.
The necklace movement indicates the epicenter, not only from the area where it snaps but from its trajectory up and around his right shoulder around his back where it rest on the back of his left shoulder.
The shirt deformation on the back of his collar indicates a extremely quick gas expansion which is followed by the shrapnel lifting the front of his left collar up around his face. Combine this with the necklace movement and you get the epicenter of the energetic event.
Watch the cavitation of his chest and stomach traveling away from the epicenter. It’s the opposite direction of the cavitation of his neck and face, another sign of the epicenter.
Look at his knees… they quickly close and almost cross as he lifts his body from the chair. His elbows turn as his hands clasp, crossing his knuckles and flexing his wrist. His left leg even extends as he falls out of the chair.
First real update to cancer PPI treatment expenditures since July 2025.
Spending is now holding at a new growth rate of roughly 2% per annum in constant dollars—nearly ten times the pre-vaccine growth rate. This aligns closely with the ACS new cancer diagnoses figures (2.5%) released last week as well as the novel (2.4%) cancer mortality growth rate we have been tracking in the NCHS data.
–Excess Constant$ cancer PPI-Treatment: +24.2%
–Excess ACS cancer diagnoses: +17.6%
The implication is straightforward: these excess cancer cases are materially more expensive (rapid and life-threatening) to treat than prior cohorts, even after accounting for medical services PPI inflation.
To the Covid liars—the ones who wished death upon us, and the seizure and forced vaccination of our children—this triple confirmation by independent sources, inflection and concurrence is dismissed as fiction.
After all, gods possess foreknowledge; omniscience requires no evidence. They know only who must be punished for their disobedience.
We, by contrast, will adhere to what the data itself continues to corroborate as true.
A note to readers of ABN, the Buddha was the world’s first skeptic. Pyrrho learned the philosophy from Buddhist monks in Bactria about 100 years after the Buddha’s passing.
Delusion exists on many levels, including the calamitous mind-control of the bioweapon vaxxes. ABN
American Buddhist Net 