Silenced by Tommy Robinson

This documentary explores the manipulation of news stories, the consequences faced by truth-seekers, and the unholy alliance between the media, justice system, and politicians. It focuses on a playground incident between two boys, Bailey and Jamal, which became a global news event. The film questions the accountability of the media, the effectiveness of the legal system, and the treatment of dissidents in the UK. It reveals testimonies that contradict the mainstream narrative and highlights the threats and hate comments received by both boys.

This may take a few minutes to load. ABN

Eye-to-eye contact is rare but shapes our social behavior

When speaking to one another, much of the communication occurs nonverbally – through body posture, hand gestures, and the eyes. Our eye gaze during conversations therefore reveals a wealth of information about our attention, intention, or psychological states. But, there remains little scientific knowledge about the information that human eyes convey in interactions – is looking at others’ faces enough, or does our communication require eye-to-eye contact?

Researchers from McGill University and Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) have studied the prevalence of eye contact by recording the eye gazing behavior in face-to-face dyadic interactions and found that although eye-to-eye contact occurred rarely, it communicated important messages which are vital for subsequent successful social behavior.

The study participants, who did not know each other beforehand, were paired and presented with an imaginary survival scenario which required the pairs to rank a list of items in order of their usefulness for survival, all while wearing mobile eye-tracking glasses. The researchers analyzed how often the participants looked at each other’s eye and mouth regions. The researchers also tested each participant individually for gaze following and linked the prevalence of different types of mutual looks during the interaction (i.e., eye-to-eye vs. eye-to-mouth) with the tendency to follow their partner’s gaze.

source

This study is interesting and, to an extent, important, but from a FIML point of view it bespeaks the shallowness of our understanding of human communication. ABN

A world without mothers?

Guerini suggests: “The use of your own body would be considered a sign of social inferiority and poverty. A natural mother would be considered potentially irresponsible, like mothers who currently opt for home birth, refusing the hospitalisation and medicalisation of the process… Natural childbirth would first be treated as irresponsible, then criminal.

“Remember that there can be no Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP) without the selection of spermatozoa and of embryos… When technoscientists get involved in the process of procreation they want to set the characteristics of each of these elements, choose them, modify them and determine the end result.

“The laboratory environment transforms the birth process into a technical operation: the embryo becomes a product to be selected, improved, rejected or transformed”.

Guerini explains that there have long been some feminists, notably Shulasmith Firestone, who acclaim artificial reproduction as “liberating” women from “biological tyranny”.

And she predicts that artificial wombs will be demanded, like MAP, as a “right” for everyone, including “transgender” people.

These are “false rights”, says Guerini, and need to be exposed as such.

“Having a child cannot be claimed as a right, neither for a heterosexual couple nor for a homosexual couple, nor for a single woman or man. There cannot be a right to have a child. The capacity to generate life cannot be claimed as a new right by men who identify as women. Procreation can never belong to them”.

source

POSSIBLE CANCER CURE

[Everything below is from the article: Can 2 Cheap Meds, 1 Vitamin & Baking Soda Kill Any Cancer? Please read the whole thing to better understand this protocol. ABN]

The Proposed Protocol

Unlike most traditional cytotoxic cancer therapies that destroy both cancer cells as well as regular cells and especially the body’s immune system cells, this protocol stimulates the body’s own innate and adaptive immune system to fight off cancer. 

This protocol should not be used in combination with most mainstream cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, due to their ability to impair the immune system that the protocol depends on. 

It is likely to be most potent at the early stages of disease; further progress of the condition will prolong duration of treatment needed. 

A healthy immune system takes time to ramp up the necessary response, so the protocol is based on the time required for each drug to take effect, safety data, bioavailability, and elimination time.

Day 1:

Ivermectin: 1 mg/kg by mouth

Fenbendazole: 1000mg by mouth

Sodium Bicarbonate: 1 tsp morning and evening dissolved in 1 quart of water

Day 2:

Ascorbic acid: 50 mg/kg by mouth, two doses, 8 hours apart or 20g IV, once

Day 3:

Repeat Day 1

Day 4:

Repeat Day 2

Days 5 to 10:

Fenbendazole, 200mg by mouth daily

Alternate sodium bicarbonate and ascorbic acid every other day beginning with sodium bicarb on day 5, then vitamin C on day 6, etc. 

Day 11:

Ivermectin: 1 mg/kg by mouth

Fenbendazole: 1000 mg by mouth

Sodium Bicarbonate: 1 tsp morning and evening dissolved in 1 quart of water

Days 12 to 20:

Sodium Bicarbonate: 1 tsp morning and evening dissolved in 1 quart of water

Day 20:

Imaging: Check progress. Significant reduction or complete elimination of tumor mass should have occurred by this time, if not repeat the protocol. 

At this time the US FDA has not approved this protocol for study or for use in humans. 

Still ‘Freedom of Speech, Not Reach’ on Xwitter but it could be worse

Musk is doing more than most. Assuming he is sincere, he is up against a host of malevolent adversaries. Obviously, freedom of speech, not reach is not freedom of speech, But Musk’s predicament is severe. Advertising money rules. If you want unvarnished truth & opinion, you will find it on small sites and in your own kitchen if you dare to speak freely there. ABN

What REALLY happened on J6

Now that we have the tapes proving January 6th was not the violent insurrection we were told it was, let me enlighten you on what ACTUALLY happened that day.

Flashback to January 4th, 2021. Pence promised that he was going to “hear the objections and evidence”, in reference to the massive irregularities and voter fraud in the 2020 election (video attached).

Pence never got to hear those electors air their objections or evidence. The January 6th event at the Capitol was the means Pence used to justify NOT giving electors their day in Congress. Pence claimed the acts by Trump and his supporters were so heinous, that he was just going to certify the election the next day.

Well, now that we have the January 6th tapes, it is clear this event was facilitated and coordinated by elements within our own government, and the evidence of this was intentionally withheld from the American People in order to continue perpetuating this massive lie.

You witnessed an insurrection on January 6th 2021, but it wasn’t by Trump supporters. It was by establishment politicians, elements within the intelligence community, and State-controlled MSM outlets, who coordinated to generate, escalate, and exaggerate the situation in order to avoid electors airing their objections, in order to certify a stolen election. You witnessed treason and war waged on the American People.

That’s what happened on January 6th. Our nation was stolen from us by corrupt elements within our own government. And all the hatred, discrimination, censorship, and vitriol towards Trump supporters, ALL of it was based on a lie.

You best start believing in Orwellian dystopias. You’re in one.

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

source

Speaker Mike Johnson to release ALL videos from January 6 starting TODAY – and will blur out the faces of some of rioters

Speaker Mike Johnson announced Friday he would begin making all of the January 6th footage available to the public immediately, following through on a promise to right-wing conservatives that started under former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

The clips will be posted on the Committee on House Administration’s website and much of the more than 44,000 hours of security footage from Jan. 6 has already gone up. Around 90 hours of footage is expected Friday and the rest over the coming months. 

The clips will blur the faces of private citizens to ensure no one is ‘targeted for retaliation of any kind.’ The speaker said roughly five percent of the footage would not be posted so as not to release sensitive security information ‘related to the building architecture.’

source