The real reason for the Ukraine War becomes more obvious every day

The goal of the Ukraine War is now and always has been to kill as many young Ukrainians as possible while also driving away as many other Ukrainians as possible. This has been a great success: 500,000 Ukrainian young men killed and half the rest of the population driven away since the war began. Who is going to own Ukraine in future and who is going to live there when the war is over? The Ukrainians who have fled say they will never return. It is fair to wonder at this point (and before) if the war was: 1) a backup plan for Israel if they are overwhelmed and driven out of the Middle East in a regional war; or 2) that has always been the main plan. When/if Israel falls, they all move to Ukraine. ABN

New Report Reveals Federal Gov’t “Funds Domestic Censorship Superweapons” Against Taxpayers

A new report reveals more details about how the Biden administration is plowing millions of dollars of taxpayer funds into woke universities and private firms to fund the “Censorship Industrial Complex.” 

During the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government hearing on Tuesday morning, Daily Caller News Foundation (DCNF) reporter Katelynn Richardson detailed how the federal government used taxpayer dollars to fund numerous projects that censored anyone with a non-government-approved view. 

“The effort fits within the broader trend of the federal government’s increasing involvement in online censorship, from the Center for Disease Control flagging posts during COVID-19 to the FBI working with social media companies to suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story,” Richardson said.

link

Information control = mind control. In light of this, consider also that nothing our government does is causing our society to thrive. ABN

Israeli ‘security experts’ claim ‘no suspicion of treason’ on 10/07

source w video

Some will accept this claim without suspicion and some will know there is an overwhelming chance the raid was allowed to happen on purpose for precisely the results we are seeing today. A little more analysis reveals that even the bold claim made by ‘security experts’ is weasel-worded because in the eyes of the perps and many others it would not be treason to provoke a regional war or worse. That’s how you do war, by deception. A third analytic factor is whatever mainstream news says is almost always the opposite of the truth. ABN

If you know everything about everybody and you know how everybody is connected to everybody else, can you know for certain who is at the top?

[This essay provides an essential background for understanding KOBK (Kill-or-be-Killed) game-theory on both the interpersonal and societal levels. Like all psychological phenomena, KOBK is fractal, potentially operating at all levels of society: from the individual to the social collective. ABN]

For the most part, you can’t.

Look at it this way—how does someone like Dick Cheney, say, know he knows what he is doing, or was doing as vice-president? [This essay was written in 2012, hence the reference to Cheney. No other references are dated.]

He had a semiosis about what he was doing and where he stood within the American political/military hierarchy, but how did he know that that semiosis wasn’t a front for another semiosis (game plan) hidden behind it? How would someone like Cheney find out that there was no other game plan hidden behind the game plans he knew about?

I don’t think he did know or could have known. Did Cheney realize that? Does he realize it now? I can’t answer.

One way someone like that could get information that shows he at least knows a lot, if not the whole thing, is to exercise power. If someone can exercise power and not be stopped, they can be kind of certain that the semiosis they are working within is “true.” Their game plan worked, so there is a greater chance they are in control than if it had not worked. But how can they be certain? I don’t think they can be.

Take another example: A crime boss in the 1980s might have done his thing for years believing all the while that he had the system figured out. Because he kept getting away with his crimes (because he was able to continuously exercise power without being stopped), he may have come to believe that his game plan worked, that he was at the top of his power structure, that his semiosis was “true.”

But we know that many of those bosses in the 1980s were wrong. For years their phones and meeting places were bugged, leading to successful prosecutions under RICO laws. The bosses thought that they had found a way to distance themselves from the nitty gritty of their crimes, but they were wrong. Their game plan (their semiosis) was wrong.

Continue reading “If you know everything about everybody and you know how everybody is connected to everybody else, can you know for certain who is at the top?”

Michael Yon on Jewish money funding mass illegal migration into USA

Bret Weinstein went to the Darién Gap to visit with Michael Yon. There is no way Bret is unaware of who is behind mass immigration and parasitic ruination of USA. Same for Carlson. ABN

Amazing Polly on Bret Weinstein and Tucker Carlson

You could also say both are going as far as they think they can go without being destroyed. We are nearing a point where most people know about and many understand the effects of Jewish power in USA and the West. The next point to reach will be everybody knows, then everybody knows everybody knows. Then the game is up. The danger in getting from here to there is yet another dramatic, even cataclysmic, psyop to take our attention off the perpetrators; such as terror attacks in USA, which may involve CCP operatives and a new virus being released in many places at once, regional war in and around Israel, WW3. I see Polly’s point and also that Bret and Tucker did say a lot and by not saying everything they may have made that point even stronger. In a totalitarian regime, and we are living in one, people learn to talk about the regime by getting close to saying it but not fully saying it. Even I feel the need to do that to some extent. It’s not always a matter of bravery or dedication to truth but also being left alive to speak at all. ABN

‘It’s not a friendly migration’ — Bret Weinstein

It’s late for me, so more on this tomorrow. Bret makes good points and also lays a lot on China. He mentions we are infested with parasites. I agree. The same energies and types who destroyed Russia and built the Soviet Union on dead bodies are doing precisely that in USA but with less overt violence. The scale of covert violence is probably about the same. That is parasitic. It’s a conquest but also a parasitic one, a destructive one because that’s the easiest way to win. Bret doesn’t want to name names. I am sure many will believe he is not naming names because he is covering for them. Tucker goes along with all of it. It’s strong stuff but reminds me of Lenin: ‘The best way to deal with your opposition is to control them’. ABN

Red flags after covid vax — Angus Dalgleish

Worth a listen for medical insights but blame is placed solely on Big Pharma, ignoring the central role of USA’s DoD in either forcing or allowing Big Pharma to make the vax under legal protections. There are a fair number of people claiming that blaming Big Pharma is a limited hangout designed to let DoD avoid responsibility. In this vein, I suppose the plan is to gut Big Pharma if the people become angry enough and the energy is there, thus protecting DoD. It will be a make-believe remedy, though, if that is done as Big Pharma will surely remain much the same, given new names and brochures and shuffling personnel at most. I think something like this is probably going on but do not believe that everyone who contributes to it, as they are in this video, is necessarily guilty of willfully acting as a limited hangout or knowingly protecting DoD. All of us have limited understanding of almost everything, and this should be kept in mind as we negotiate our way through probably the largest and boldest psyop ever conceived. ABN

Error correction from Bret Weinstein

Sort of good enough but weakened by tones of self-promotion. In a time when information is widely scattered claiming ‘honor’ and that you already did something most seem not to have noticed takes back with one hand what you gave with the other. I am willing to put that behind us and will continue paying attention to Bret but not without a measure of skepticism. ABN

An example showing that being a good talker does not mean you are a good thinker

Bret is a professional biologist or evolutionary biologist, yet he made this elementary mistake and sounds perfectly reasonable while discussing it. He did similar for early lockdowns when he said extremely strict lockdowns in USA would have ended the ‘pandemic’ in two weeks. I am not trying to run Bret down but to illustrate why his continuous refusal to simply admit he was wrong and correct his mistakes is a problem. I have not deeply studied Bret or his work so I may be wrong on these details, but that’s how the story has appeared to me since his Carlson interview, and before but to a much lesser extent. Covid, climate, vaxxes, diet, sociology and almost all other major topics that lend themselves to corruption are rife with glaring errors and individuals calling themselves professionals who not only fail to correct those errors, but repeat them. ABN

Michael Mann gets hammered in court over deficiencies in his Hockey Stick analysis

Professor Michael Mann took an enormous hammering in court over the deficiencies in his Hockey Stick analysis.
He is suing Mark Steyn (and Rand Simberg) for defamation after they called his graph a fraud. Just listen to Simberg’s lawyer Victoria Weatherford demolish him: 

Mann said he did not gather the data for the Hockey Stick.
He handled the statistics that showed flat temps for 1000 years and a sudden recent warming and tried desperately to avoid admitting he was not qualified in statistics. 

W your PHD is not in statistics?
MANN My PHD is in geology and geo ‘s a
broad field involves science data analysis. There’s
lot of statistics I took course work in statistics
during my PHD program

W Yes or no? Your PHD is not in statistics? MANN: It’s in geology & geophysics
W:That’s a no, it’s not in statistics
MANN: Obviously No. 

And then Mann tried to deny, not very convincingly, that he failed to consult a professional statistician when constructing the Hockey Stick graph – possibly the most influential graph of the 20th century. 

link

Yet another example of how bad ‘The Science’ is. Wherever you look our usurpers get it wrong, apparently deliberately, and then use that to steal and oppress. Mann is another silver tongue who maybe does not think so clearly.

Leaving Mann aside, I believe self-deception is a trait with both genetic and cultural roots. A person who can self-deceive will always be better at deceiving others and/or getting their way than a person who is resolutely honest and never self-deceives and never tries to deceive others. Nice guys finish last (unless they become monks). Deception and self-deception are major factors in who controls the world, who speaks for the controllers, and who wants to speak for them. In today’s world, there are trillions of dollars at stake. So we should expect to see most, if not all, prominent speakers adept at self- and other-deception. Historically, parasitic cultures and subcultures have not just used self- and other-deception, they have also trained themselves and their children in this devious art. This is a huge factor in our world today since every major topic is rife with deception on more levels than one. ABN