Satanic Ritual Abuse

Part 2 of this video can be found on YouTube if it does not automatically follow Part 1.

I have personal experience with some aspects of stuff like this. I remember many of their faces and expressions. It’s completely evil and definitely is happening.

What I know is less about Satanism and more about targeting individuals for gradual destruction with the goal of undermining their communities.

It’s a mistake to focus only on Satanic rituals because the philosophy behind it encompasses much more than sex and rituals. It is about total control, world domination.

The most extreme claim is that a group like this is either in control of the West or is vying for control. Satanism etc. is used as a cover and initiation into that group.

In this vein, I am somewhat hopeful that Donald Trump is going to actually do something to stop it. It’s possible Trump’s brother Fred was a targeted individual and it is possible that Trump knows or suspects this.

It’s even possible that Trump ran for president in the first place because he knows about this and has been helped by people within the intelligence agencies who also know.

That’s a long-shot but if it happens—if Trump busts those fuckers—it will be the greatest socio-political event of all time.

Pizzagate may turn out to be nothing, but I think it is plausible and worth following. A big problem with cases like these is the charges are so outlandish and the victims (those that lived) are so deeply harmed by it, it is difficult to grasp the enormity.

But think about it. What better way to hide a wide-ranging criminal enterprise to undermine and control society than to conceal your actions behind Satanism and ritual child abuse, two of the last subjects most people ever want to consider?

One good thing is more people seem to understand this today than ten or twenty years ago.

America as a Promised Land for Jews: Threatened by Muslims, Israel and White Identity?

by Kevin MacDonald

I am going to talk about Jews. It’s not that I relish doing this, but somebody’s got to do it, and it’s definitely a subject that needs to be addressed as best we can, fairly and factually, and with the understanding that we are not talking about all Jews but about activist Jews and the general thrust of the organized Jewish community…

…Multiculturalism is the contemporary version of utopian Marxist rhetoric that was pushed by three generations of Jewish intellectuals: Even after millions of murders and the incarceration of many more millions, they preached that we can look forward to the utopian dream of a classless society. Now we are supposed to look forward to a future of blissful ethnic harmony, despite the long and bloody history of ethnic conflict around the world. As with communism, these utopias ultimately fail because they are not based on scientific views of human nature or on the social science research on the costs and consequences of multiculturalism to native populations. (Source)

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill: “Multiculturalism has no future”

“Multiculturalism has no future. Because it implies different cultures mixing. Different cultures and religions pour together and shaken vigorously to create a kind of cocktail. That would be impossible because of deep rooted traditions.

“..this very approach contains a dangerous source of division, and I mean the fundamental division of the ‘brother against brother’ kind.”(Source)

No-Touch Torture Report

Gloomy but interesting read on “no-touch” torture. Shows how inherent human weaknesses are used against people and what those weaknesses are.

An example:

5.       Imprisonment and Isolation

Isolation is commonly used as punishment in prisons. Many whistleblowers like Bradley Manning suffer this condition. In soft interrogation it is used to get the target to talk to their interrogator since humans have the need for companionship. In no-touch torture the target is driven from their friends and family using different techniques in order to isolate them so that the electronic mind control has more effect on their psyche.  Like in Guantanamo, the target becomes isolated losing their job and medical care. Part of the method involves slander in their community. They end up on the most part in poverty and paranoid about doctors and other people from false correlations that are purposefully induced into their lives. Isolation is also a form of sensory deprivation which will be discussed later. Days and weeks lose their meaning. (Executive Summary: Neuropsychological and Electronic No-Touch Torture Report)

I personally believe no-touch torture is sometimes done on people who have no idea it is being done at all.

Psychological gaslighting is an example of this, but there are many other reasons a person or group of people might seek to destroy an individual through clandestine means. And many other ways to do it, some of which can be found at the link above.

Somewhat related, this is not about torture but manipulation. Probably not a bad idea as reported: Pentagon Paid for Fake ‘Al Qaeda’ Videos A controversial foreign PR firm known for representing unsavory characters was paid millions by the Pentagon to create fake terrorist videos.

The illusion of culture

Cultures have illusory “grammars” that outline what can and cannot be said.

Culture wars, essentially, are battles over what can and cannot be said, done, signaled, thought, believed, valued, etc.

A few days ago in You can’t say what they don’t already know, I said:

Cultures demand constant authorization and reauthorization from their members. To stray from established norms is to weaken group authorizations.

That’s how it works for all cultures with more than a few members. Cultural bonding and affirmation involves nothing more than authorizing and reauthorizing the basics of the culture.

It even works that way in groups as small as two people. This because two people speaking together typically do so in a larger cultural context that is defined and accepted by both of them.

Just as most people do not make up their own words or jokes, most people do not make up the bases of their culture(s).

Even committed couples speaking in private typically do not leave their shared cultural script(s). This happens because they do not know any other way to speak to each other.

A profound and rich world of subjective insight and perception eludes them because they are afraid they might stray too far from the established script.

Culture becomes deeply illusory at this point. Its tenets are held not due to thought and insight but only to stabilize or maintain a rote communication pattern.

You can change this by using a functional communication pattern instead of rote cultural grammar that has been imported into your mind from outside.

As an experiment, try not feeling anything about the basics of your culture. Do FIML from this point of view and see what happens.

You can’t say what they don’t already know

The main problem with culture is, in virtually all cases, “you can’t say what they don’t already know.”

Some very small cultures of just a few people are exceptions to this rule, but no large culture with anonymous and/or not-well-known members is.

Cultures demand constant authorization and reauthorization from their members. To stray from established norms is to weaken group authorizations.

In the world today, you cannot escape the above truth about culture. You will find it prevails no matter where you go.

In your private life you can escape the above truth by doing FIML practice. The whole point of FIML is to speak about things you don’t already know.

New evidence of rice domestication in China discovered

This discovery shows clearly that attempts were being made to remove wild strains from domesticated ones. From the study:

Plant remains dating to between 9000 and 8400 BP from a probable ditch structure at the Huxi site include the oldest rice (Oryza sativa) spikelet bases and associated plant remains recovered in China. The remains document an early stage of rice domestication and the ecological setting in which early cultivation was taking place. The rice spikelet bases from Huxi include wild (shattering), intermediate, and domesticated (non-shattering) forms. The relative frequency of intermediate and non-shattering spikelet bases indicates that selection for, at the very least, non-shattering rice was underway at Huxi.

The study: Rice Domestication Revealed by Reduced Shattering of Archaeological rice from the Lower Yangtze valley