FDA attorney spins clouds of BS, just as we expected

FDA Attorney Ashley Cheung Honold Now Says Doctors Did Have the Right to Prescribe Ivermectin Off-Label for COVID-19 “Here FDA was not regulating the off-label use of drugs…

The FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID”

“If the FDA is merely making information statements, they do have sovereign immunity”

“There’s nothing in the multiple sources of authority that I cited that require the FDA to go through any sort of formal process”

“Even if this court concluded that the parts of the statement that said ‘Stop It’ were unlawful, the remaining parts of the statements that merely provided information would still be available”

“The public can elect its government officials and FDA…have politically accountable heads of the agency who are held accountable by the political process. It’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements”

source

Remember, nobody forced you to take the vax. Politicians and government officials also are not responsible for what they said, mandated, or did because the entire US covid response was controlled by the NSA. And they are wrapped in secrecy and immunity based on ‘national security’. This is our world, our nation. It cannot be fixed through the courts or politics. Democracy is a fantasy, a delusion. All we the people have is our collective will and understanding. And that’s not nothing. I do this site because I recognize these truths. One day soon, digital babies may save us from this mundane stupidity. Hundreds of millions of people much more intelligent than anyone who has ever lived is a very optimistic thought, imo. Buddhists will have no problem with how life arises, even if it is in a machine. ABN

How to do anti-science on repurposed drugs

Handbook to conduct fraudulent clinical research on repurposed drugs in the context of covid-19, in order to show that they do not bring benefits (updated jan 2023).

Randomized trial protocols:

➖Choose the wrong drug dosage, too high (HCQ – Recovery, Solidarity) or too low (IVM – Together) depending on the safety and efficacy of the drug,
2/n 

➖Choose the wrong treatment duration (IVM – Together, etc…),
3/n 

➖Choose the wrong timing for intervention: start treatment late when your trial aims to study an antiviral (HCQ – Recovery, Solidarity, Discovery),
4/n 

➖Modify the inclusion criteria concerning the time between symptoms and recruitment (Principle: 7 days, changed to 14 days),
5/n 

➖Do not exclude young patients in good health, it will be difficult to see a difference between the groups (IVM – Lopez-Medina et al.),
6/n 

➖Do not exclude patients who took the drug tested in the trial before recruitment, (IVM – Together, Lopez-Medina et al.),

continue reading…

Today’s world has more anti-science than ever before. Anti-science is the deliberate falsification of testing, evidence, or conclusion that results in predictable harm. It is an extremely bad type of pseudoscience. ABN

Higher number of early childhood vaccine doses correlates with higher death rates

Abstract

Introduction

In 2011, using 2009 data, we published a study demonstrating that among the most highly developed nations, those requiring the most vaccine doses for their infants tended to have the least favorable infant mortality rates (= 0.70, < .0001). Twelve years later, we replicated our original study using 2019 data. Linear regression analysis corroborated the positive trend reported in our initial paper (= 0.45; < .002). Herein, we broaden our analyses to consider the effect of vaccines on neonatal and under age five mortality rates. 

Objective

We performed several investigations to explore potential relationships between the number of early childhood vaccine doses required by nations and their neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates.

Methods

In this ecological study, we conducted linear regression analyses of neonatal, infant, and under age five vaccine doses required by nations and their neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates. All analyses were based on 2019 and 2021 data. We also stratified nations by the number of neonatal vaccine doses required and conducted a one-way ANOVA test and a post hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine if there were statistically significant differences in the group mean neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates of nations that administered zero, one, or two neonatal vaccine doses.

Results

Linear regression analyses of neonatal vaccine doses required by nations in our 2021 dataset yielded statistically significant positive correlations to rates of neonatal mortality (= 0.34, p = .017), infant mortality (= 0.46, p = .0008), and under age five mortality (= 0.48, p = .0004). Similar results were reported using 2019 data.

Utilizing 2021 data, a post hoc Tukey-Kramer test indicated a statistically significant pairwise difference between the mean neonatal mortality rates, mean infant mortality rates, and mean under age five mortality rates of nations requiring zero vs. two neonatal vaccine doses. There was a statistically significant difference of 1.28 deaths per 1000 live births (p < .002) between the mean infant mortality rates among nations that did not give their neonates any vaccine doses and those that required two vaccine doses.

Using 2019 and 2021 data, 17 of 18 analyses (12 bivariate linear regressions and six ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests) achieved statistical significance and corroborated the findings reported in our original study of a positive association between the number of vaccine doses required by developed nations and their infant mortality rates.

Conclusions

There are statistically significant positive correlations between mortality rates of developed nations and the number of early childhood vaccine doses that are routinely given. Further investigations of the hypotheses generated by this study are recommended to confirm that current vaccination schedules are achieving their intended objectives.

source: Neonatal, Infant, and Under Age Five Vaccine Doses Routinely Given in Developed Nations and Their Association With Mortality Rates

from the study linked above

These are deaths. Deaths indicate much higher harm rates. ABN

Washington State University fires Dr Reni Moon for discussing dangers of covid vax for children at US Senate fact-finding roundtable

After teaching at Washington State University (WSU) since 2017, Dr. Renata Moon was terminated in June of this year after voicing concerns about the dangers of the Covid-19 mRNA shots for children. Dr. Moon was invited to a U.S. Senate fact-finding subcommittee in December of 2022 to provide testimony on what she was seeing in patients. The decision not to renew her annual contract, as revealed in recent court documents, was made despite her unblemished 25-year career as a board-certified Pediatrician.

Court documents filed in Benton County Superior Court by the Silent Majority Foundation (SMF) on July 12th (the Complaint) and on July 13th (plaintiff Declarations) reveal that WSU threatened to report Dr. Renata Moon to the Washington Medical Commission (WMC) because of testimony requested by the Senate subcommittee roundtable headed by Sen. Ron Johnson (WI-R), and even though her comments to the subcommittee were delivered as a private individual on her own time. WSU sent a letter on June 29th of this year announcing their decision not to renew her employment as an Associate Clinical Professor. The complaint is posted on the SMF blog.

Dr. Moon has board certification in Pediatrics and Pediatric Hospital Medicine from the American Board of Pediatrics, is licensed in many states, and has practiced as a pediatrician for over twenty-five years. Her Declaration states “I have never had any action(s) against any state medical license. I have never been named as a defendant in any medical malpractice lawsuit.”

source

Canned for speaking the truth. ‘Those who want to censor you are never the good guys’ — RFK Jr. Never been so obvious as now. WSU is supposed to be an institution of higher learning. They have been infiltrated by agents of totalitarian unreason and anti-science. ABN

Unwise are they who wallow in red herring sauce

Pandemic Aftermath Update Wk 27 2023

As one can see, the US has indeed returned to baseline in terms of All Cause Mortality, as proclaimed widely in the MSM.

But that is NOT the story, and unwise are they who wallow in its red herring sauce.

In terms of Excess Non-Natural Cause Mortality, we still reside at 15.7%.

The fact that this mortality now features a natural seasonality implies that natural deaths are concealed in this death category.

They’ve ceded the lockdown argument in an effort to protect the vaccine.

link

Northwestern University academics accuse students of ‘fascism’ after they said they identified as ‘Apache attack helicopters’ on survey about engineering culture

Northwestern academics have accused students of ‘fascism’ after they said they identified as ‘Apache attack helicopters’ on a survey about engineering culture.

The researchers claimed the far-right was on the rise across the US after seeing the students’ replies to the questionnaire.

They claimed the responses were ‘malicious’ and a sign of white supremacy, which they then wrote about in a paper titled ‘Attack Helicopters and White Supremacy: Interesting Malicious Responses to an Online Questionnaire about Transgender Undergraduate Engineering and Computer Science Student Experiences’.

The researchers wrote the paper describing their experiences working on the survey about LGBT students in STEM fields.

They said the ‘backlash’ to the project ‘reflects characteristics of contemporary far-right or fascist political movements in the US, such as the synthesis of antisemitism with anti-Black and anti-feminist rhetorics.’

According to a report in the College Fix, about one-quarter of the so-called ‘malicious responses’ to the survey provided some airplane-related response to the gender question, including a handful who specifically identified as an ‘Apache helicopter.’

link

Claiming these obviously mocking responses were ‘malicious’ signs of white supremacy indicates these researchers identify as fortunetellers. ABN

Coercive methods to control whole populations

This meme is from about two years ago. It seems that period produced many of the best covid memes. Surely, pressure to get vaxxed was a major factor in meme production as was more than a year of watching covid policies fail or be exposed for their irrationality while government officials assiduously pretended they were working perfectly and criticism of them was subversive disinformation, a cause for shadow-banning or deplatforming. ABN

1,884 Athlete Cardiac Arrests in 2.5 Years, 1,310 Dead

In the past two and a half years, the number of athletes suffering sudden cardiac arrests and related issues has soared to alarming levels.

In early 2021, young athletes started suddenly collapsing with heart-related medical emergencies.

Since then, a staggering 1,884 cardiac arrests or other serious issues have been recorded among athletes.

Unfortunately, 1,310 of those athletes died suddenly.

Good Sciencing has been maintaining a non-exhaustive and continuously growing list of mainly young athletes who suffered major medical issues in 2021, 2022, and the first half of 2023.

According to Good Sciencing, all of the athletes on the list share one common factor: They suffered sudden serious health issues after receiving one or more doses of Covid shots.

link

Asymmetric warfare. Athletes are just one measure of the harm. ABN

Thrown to the Wolves: A physician reveals the nightmare of transgender ideology in a major children’s hospital

Within these academic institutions, so-called experts in the field of transgender medicine would simply declare that puberty blockers and other interventions were the gold standard of care. The evidence to support this is completely fraudulent, but no dissent was permitted. Everyone within the medical community knew that if he questioned transgender ideology, he would suffer the same type of repercussions that had happened during Covid. 

But in reality, when you “affirm” these individuals’ gender identity, what you are doing is affirming their hatred for themselves. You have these children who are going through confusing times, difficult times; when you affirm this belief system, what you’re really doing is telling them: “You hate yourself at this moment, and I will affirm that.” We have to ask ourselves, why do these people have such high rates of suicide? Because we’re affirming that they should hate themselves and that they should try to destroy themselves.

One of the things I’ve been thinking about is what puberty blockers do to children. This medication is called a “gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist” and it comes in the form of monthly injections or an implant. And because it simulates the activity of this hormone, it shuts down the activity of the hypothalamus. The hypothalamus is this almond-sized structure in your brain, it’s one of the most primal structures we have, and it controls all the other hormonal structures in your body—your sexual development, your emotions, your fight-or-flight response, everything… To shut down that system is to shut down what makes us human.

link

New emails show COVID vaccine mandates were based on a lie

New documents indicate the entire justification for vaccine mandates was based on a falsehood — and that public health officials knew it.

Emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request show that CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and former NIH Director Francis Collins were aware of, and discussed, “breakthrough cases” of COVID in January 2021 — right when the vaccines became widely available. In her email, Walensky says that “clearly,” it is an “important area of study,” links to a study raising the issue, and assures the person she is sending it to that Dr. Anthony Fauci is looped into these conversations.

However, in public, Walensky was saying something quite different. Two months after discussing this data, she said vaccinated people “don’t carry the virus” and “don’t get sick.” In a congressional hearing, after it became clear people were able to get infected with COVID even after receiving the vaccine, she defended her original statements by claiming it was true at the time she said it — namely, for the strands we were dealing with in early 2021.

We now know that was not true and that Walensky herself knew it was not true.

link