Contrast GOVERNMENT disinformation with FREE SPEECH

This meme appeared over two years ago. Besides pointing out how bad government sanctioned and enforced speech was (and is), it illustrates how good the censored speech of all of the doctors and scientists who spoke the truth was. The worst misinformation and disinformation all came from the government! And what little misinformation there was not produced by governments was quickly weeded out and discarded along with the government misinformation. The main counterargument to government disinformation on covid saved hundreds of thousands of lives nationally and millions globally. It is important for all of us to see this and remember—free speech won the covid debate! Free speech did not harm anyone during covid. It saved people. This will always be the case. When government or ADL or anyone else demands that the people must be protected from disinformation, remember the covid example (and also the Ukraine War example, and also WMD in Iraq, and also the real story of Mary Phagan, etc). ABN

Medical Board Chief Who Wanted Doctors Delicensed for ‘Misinformation’ in Bed With PR Firm Tied to CDC, Pfizer, Moderna

The head of a national medical organization who publicly called for doctors to lose their licenses unless they supported government narratives on COVID-19 treatments and vaccines concealed his relationship with a public relations firm whose client list also included Pfizer, Moderna and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Dr. Richard Baron, president and CEO of the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) is a client of Weber Shandwick, investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker reported on Wednesday.

In late 2021, Baron publicly pushed for doctors who spread “misinformation” about COVID-19 and the vaccines to lose their license and certification. Baron said then that “putting out flagrant misinformation is unethical and dangerous during a pandemic.”

Weber, the world’s second-largest PR firm, has branded its team as “misinformation and disinformation” experts and says it provides clients with services to help manage any perceived threats posed by spreaders of such information.

The firm has organized conference panels on “medical misinformation” in which Baron participated.

source

This is a perfect example of deadly sleazy use of the term misinformation. Misinformation and disinformation are useful terms if used properly. In this case, calling yourself a ‘misinformation and disinformation expert’ is itself mind-control through disinformation. Nearly all of our once respectable institutions have turned into sleazy lying sacks-of-shit, very sorry to say. ABN

Dr Meryl Nass sues Maine medical board over suspension, alleging board violated her First Amendment rights

Dr. Meryl Nass today filed suit against the Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine and its individual members, alleging the board violated her First Amendment rights and her rights under the Maine Constitution.

The complaint alleges the board engaged in retaliatory conduct against Nass, a practicing internal medicine physician and member of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientific advisory board, when the board suspended her medical license for publicly expressing her dissenting views on official COVID-19 policies, the COVID-19 vaccine and alternative treatments.

“Because she was outspoken, the board targeted Dr. Nass as someone to silence,” her attorney, Gene Libby told The Defender.

In fall 2021, the board issued a position statement, quoted in the complaint, stating that licensees could face disciplinary action if they “generate and spread COVID-19 vaccine misinformation or disinformation.”

source

Speech control = mind control. Those who censor never have good motives. Those who punish speech, especially in a case like this, are at best themselves mind-controlled slaves. ABN

Covid vax provider bonus program

Potential physician payment bonus for 2021 if 75% of patients received at least one dose of COVID vax for a typical practice — TOTAL = $382,125.00

There were two main programs for “incentives” for this regulated biological product. The first was pretty straight-up; this many bucks extra per jabbed patient as an “incentive”. The government paid insurance companies, who then would reimburse providers. The amount of money for this program is staggering, although the government has not made the individual distribution amounts of insurance companies, pharmacies, etc. public.

source

More details and documentation at the link above. Most of us have heard of this program but the link provides solid numbers. This ‘bonus program’ is not medicine, it is corruption plus quackery plus unholy greed. I personally feel deep shame for anyone who facilitated this ghoulish obscenity, which endangered patients and betrayed their trust. And that this was done even to children… for money. ABN

FDA still lyin’ like a ten-year-old

I had this experience three times. Three separate pharmacies refused to fill doctor lawfully prescribed ivermectin. One was polite, the second was a rude bitch, and the third was a member of the state pharmacy board. He was polite and discussed his refusal with me. In his mind it came down to ‘this all came from on-high’ and he would not go against that. Who is on-high, I asked. He said he really did not know and I believe him. So, at least two of them were good people caught in a moral dilemma and forced to make a choice they felt they could not refuse. The third probably would be a happy Bolshevist interrogator if the opportunity arose. ABN

FDA attorney spins clouds of BS, just as we expected

FDA Attorney Ashley Cheung Honold Now Says Doctors Did Have the Right to Prescribe Ivermectin Off-Label for COVID-19 “Here FDA was not regulating the off-label use of drugs…

The FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID”

“If the FDA is merely making information statements, they do have sovereign immunity”

“There’s nothing in the multiple sources of authority that I cited that require the FDA to go through any sort of formal process”

“Even if this court concluded that the parts of the statement that said ‘Stop It’ were unlawful, the remaining parts of the statements that merely provided information would still be available”

“The public can elect its government officials and FDA…have politically accountable heads of the agency who are held accountable by the political process. It’s not the role of the courts to fact-check the FDA’s scientific statements”

source

Remember, nobody forced you to take the vax. Politicians and government officials also are not responsible for what they said, mandated, or did because the entire US covid response was controlled by the NSA. And they are wrapped in secrecy and immunity based on ‘national security’. This is our world, our nation. It cannot be fixed through the courts or politics. Democracy is a fantasy, a delusion. All we the people have is our collective will and understanding. And that’s not nothing. I do this site because I recognize these truths. One day soon, digital babies may save us from this mundane stupidity. Hundreds of millions of people much more intelligent than anyone who has ever lived is a very optimistic thought, imo. Buddhists will have no problem with how life arises, even if it is in a machine. ABN

How to do anti-science on repurposed drugs

Handbook to conduct fraudulent clinical research on repurposed drugs in the context of covid-19, in order to show that they do not bring benefits (updated jan 2023).

Randomized trial protocols:

➖Choose the wrong drug dosage, too high (HCQ – Recovery, Solidarity) or too low (IVM – Together) depending on the safety and efficacy of the drug,
2/n 

➖Choose the wrong treatment duration (IVM – Together, etc…),
3/n 

➖Choose the wrong timing for intervention: start treatment late when your trial aims to study an antiviral (HCQ – Recovery, Solidarity, Discovery),
4/n 

➖Modify the inclusion criteria concerning the time between symptoms and recruitment (Principle: 7 days, changed to 14 days),
5/n 

➖Do not exclude young patients in good health, it will be difficult to see a difference between the groups (IVM – Lopez-Medina et al.),
6/n 

➖Do not exclude patients who took the drug tested in the trial before recruitment, (IVM – Together, Lopez-Medina et al.),

continue reading…

Today’s world has more anti-science than ever before. Anti-science is the deliberate falsification of testing, evidence, or conclusion that results in predictable harm. It is an extremely bad type of pseudoscience. ABN

Higher number of early childhood vaccine doses correlates with higher death rates

Abstract

Introduction

In 2011, using 2009 data, we published a study demonstrating that among the most highly developed nations, those requiring the most vaccine doses for their infants tended to have the least favorable infant mortality rates (= 0.70, < .0001). Twelve years later, we replicated our original study using 2019 data. Linear regression analysis corroborated the positive trend reported in our initial paper (= 0.45; < .002). Herein, we broaden our analyses to consider the effect of vaccines on neonatal and under age five mortality rates. 

Objective

We performed several investigations to explore potential relationships between the number of early childhood vaccine doses required by nations and their neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates.

Methods

In this ecological study, we conducted linear regression analyses of neonatal, infant, and under age five vaccine doses required by nations and their neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates. All analyses were based on 2019 and 2021 data. We also stratified nations by the number of neonatal vaccine doses required and conducted a one-way ANOVA test and a post hoc Tukey-Kramer test to determine if there were statistically significant differences in the group mean neonatal, infant, and under age five mortality rates of nations that administered zero, one, or two neonatal vaccine doses.

Results

Linear regression analyses of neonatal vaccine doses required by nations in our 2021 dataset yielded statistically significant positive correlations to rates of neonatal mortality (= 0.34, p = .017), infant mortality (= 0.46, p = .0008), and under age five mortality (= 0.48, p = .0004). Similar results were reported using 2019 data.

Utilizing 2021 data, a post hoc Tukey-Kramer test indicated a statistically significant pairwise difference between the mean neonatal mortality rates, mean infant mortality rates, and mean under age five mortality rates of nations requiring zero vs. two neonatal vaccine doses. There was a statistically significant difference of 1.28 deaths per 1000 live births (p < .002) between the mean infant mortality rates among nations that did not give their neonates any vaccine doses and those that required two vaccine doses.

Using 2019 and 2021 data, 17 of 18 analyses (12 bivariate linear regressions and six ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer tests) achieved statistical significance and corroborated the findings reported in our original study of a positive association between the number of vaccine doses required by developed nations and their infant mortality rates.

Conclusions

There are statistically significant positive correlations between mortality rates of developed nations and the number of early childhood vaccine doses that are routinely given. Further investigations of the hypotheses generated by this study are recommended to confirm that current vaccination schedules are achieving their intended objectives.

source: Neonatal, Infant, and Under Age Five Vaccine Doses Routinely Given in Developed Nations and Their Association With Mortality Rates

from the study linked above

These are deaths. Deaths indicate much higher harm rates. ABN

Washington State University fires Dr Reni Moon for discussing dangers of covid vax for children at US Senate fact-finding roundtable

After teaching at Washington State University (WSU) since 2017, Dr. Renata Moon was terminated in June of this year after voicing concerns about the dangers of the Covid-19 mRNA shots for children. Dr. Moon was invited to a U.S. Senate fact-finding subcommittee in December of 2022 to provide testimony on what she was seeing in patients. The decision not to renew her annual contract, as revealed in recent court documents, was made despite her unblemished 25-year career as a board-certified Pediatrician.

Court documents filed in Benton County Superior Court by the Silent Majority Foundation (SMF) on July 12th (the Complaint) and on July 13th (plaintiff Declarations) reveal that WSU threatened to report Dr. Renata Moon to the Washington Medical Commission (WMC) because of testimony requested by the Senate subcommittee roundtable headed by Sen. Ron Johnson (WI-R), and even though her comments to the subcommittee were delivered as a private individual on her own time. WSU sent a letter on June 29th of this year announcing their decision not to renew her employment as an Associate Clinical Professor. The complaint is posted on the SMF blog.

Dr. Moon has board certification in Pediatrics and Pediatric Hospital Medicine from the American Board of Pediatrics, is licensed in many states, and has practiced as a pediatrician for over twenty-five years. Her Declaration states “I have never had any action(s) against any state medical license. I have never been named as a defendant in any medical malpractice lawsuit.”

source

Canned for speaking the truth. ‘Those who want to censor you are never the good guys’ — RFK Jr. Never been so obvious as now. WSU is supposed to be an institution of higher learning. They have been infiltrated by agents of totalitarian unreason and anti-science. ABN