Mike Whitney pulls no punches: Will Vaccine-Linked Deaths Rise Sharply This Winter?

Blood clots, bleeding and autoimmunity are not trivial matters; they’re an indication that the body’s vital infrastructure has been compromised and, perhaps, severely damaged. This is going to manifest itself in all-cause mortality and broader public health data. A sizable portion of these maladies will be directly connected to the injection of a potentially-lethal pathogen into the bloodstream of millions of people who were deliberately misled about the safety of the product. Now we’re going to see the early results of that experiment. God help us.

link

This is the strongest, most dire and bleak prognostication on mass vax I have read. It’s also more likely than not. The evidence cited by Whitney can all be found on American Buddhist Net and we share his gloomy vision of the future. A central point in Whitney’s analysis is the inescapable conclusion that top people, including health officials, wanted this outcome. They had to have known the consequences of their policies. ABN

Safety Signals for COVID Vaccines Are Loud and Clear. Why Is Nobody Listening?

The public deserves a complete and transparent accounting of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s safety monitoring, including the results of all interim reports and analyses, whether through an Freedom of Information Act request, Congressional order or some other means.

link
Number of Deaths Since 1990.

Why do we have to grovel and beg for full disclosure of all covid data? And full keeping of all covid data? And most of all full scientific acquisition of all covid data? CDC and US govt have been overwhelmingly dishonest in almost all aspects of covid. Their behavior is so bad, one is forced to conclude widespread malfeasance and nefarious motives. ABN

The Spartacus Letter

Summary:

COVID-19 is a blood and blood vessel disease. SARS-CoV-2 infects the lining of human blood vessels, causing them to leak into the lungs.
•Current treatment protocols (e.g. invasive ventilation) are actively harmful to patients, accelerating oxidative stress and causing severe VILI (ventilator-induced lung injuries). The continued use of ventilators in the absence of any proven medical benefit constitutes mass murder.
•Existing countermeasures are inadequate to slow the spread of what is an aerosolized and potentially wastewater-borne virus, and constitute a form of medical theater. •Various non-vaccine interventions have been suppressed by both the media and the medical establishment in favor of vaccines and expensive patented drugs.
•The authorities have denied the usefulness of natural immunity against COVID-19, despite the fact that natural immunity confers protection against all of the virus’s proteins, and not just one.
Vaccines will do more harm than good. The antigen that these vaccines are based on, SARS-CoV-2 Spike, is a toxic protein. SARS-CoV-2 may have ADE, or antibody-dependent enhancement; current antibodies may not neutralize future strains, but instead help them infect immune cells. Also, vaccinating during a pandemic with a leaky vaccine removes the evolutionary pressure for a virus to become less lethal.
•There is a vast and appalling criminal conspiracy that directly links both Anthony Fauci and Moderna to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
•COVID-19 vaccine researchers are directly linked to scientists involved in brain-computer interface (“neural lace”) tech, one of whom was indicted for taking grant money from China.
•Independent researchers have discovered mysterious nanoparticles inside the vaccines that are not supposed to be present.
•The entire pandemic is being used as an excuse for a vast political and economic transformation of Western society that will enrich the already rich and turn the rest of us into serfs and untouchables.

link

Explanation of paper showing grave harm from covid vaxxes

A new hero has emerged. Mostly-retired scientist Ronald Kostoff, PhD, and a highly experienced team, just had their paper published. The appropriate, if understated title of the paper is

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Let us appreciate his restraint in never using the word “assholes” anywhere in the paper. At the age of 84, he maintains a level of polite discipline in the face of assholes I can scarcely muster on my better days.

Kostoff worked in the past as a Georgia Tech affiliated researcher (or consultant or whatever the correct term is now), has 30 years of government service, and a long publication history that includes an amazing breadth of topics including neuropsychology, information science, research and development management, molecular mass spectrometry, citation analysis, competitive intelligence, natural language processing, naval engineering, text analysis, and now analysis of what assholes refuse to analyze (soon to be a new category at researchgate). He published on disruptive technologies before it was cool.

link

The linked essay by Matthew Crawford is well-worth reading as the original paper is long and scholarly, obscuring major points for most readers. Crawford chooses good excerpts from the paper to show how damning the paper is. I am going to repeat some of them here: ABN

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.

For example, the trials and VAERS reported clots that resulted in serious symptoms and deaths but gave no indication of the enhanced predisposition to forming serious clots in the future with a higher base of micro-clots formed because of the mRNA intervention. The latter is particularly relevant to children, who have a long future that could be seriously affected by having an increased predisposition to multiple clot-based (and other) serious diseases resulting from these inoculations.

What does this mean in the real world? In the USA, there are approximately 4,000,000 children in each age year for adolescents. Thus, there are ˜16,000,000 children in the 12–15 age band. A serious adverse event, including death, that occurred at a 1/800 rate would not be detectable with high confidence in a sample of 1005 people. Thus, the results of the trials for 1005 children would allow for 20,000 children to suffer a non-trial-detected serious adverse event, including death, when extrapolated to potential inoculation of all children in the 12–15 age group! Given that the risk of contracting COVID-19 with serious outcomes is negligible in this population, proceeding with mass inoculation of children 12–15 years old based on the trials that were conducted cannot be justified on any cost-benefit ratio findings.

Kirsch, Crawford, and now Kostoff are seeing grave harm being caused by the vaccines. If you are paying full attention to this topic, this is the core issue that tells us what is really going on. ABN

It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.

It is becoming clear that the central ingredient of the injection, the recipe for the spike protein, will produce a product that can have three effects. Two of the three occur with the production of antibodies to the spike protein. These antibodies could allegedly offer protection against the virus (although with all the “breakthrough” cases reported, that is questionable), or could suppress serious symptoms to some extent. They could also cross-react with human tissue antigen, leading to potential autoimmune effects. The third occurs when the injected material enters the bloodstream and circulates widely, which is enabled by the highly vascular injection site and the use of the PEG-2000 coating.

This allows spike protein to be manufactured/expressed in endothelial cells at any location in the body, both activating platelets to cause clotting and causing vascular damage. It is difficult to believe this effect is unknown to the manufacturer, and in any case, has been demonstrated in myriad locations in the body using VAERS data. There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk, no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations to both populations. It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

I posted this paper a couple of days ago, but today noticed that Steve Kirsch is promoting it as corroborating his own findings that the vaxxes are causing more harm than good. This is an extremely important conclusion because it destroys any reason for mass vaxxing and even for most people to vax at all. ABN

Govt mismanagement of covid will be a major wedge issue in 2022 & 2024: Robert Malone

President Trump needs to figure our how to deal with this better than he has. Both he and DeSantis would do best to say the vax has some efficacy for vulnerable and anyone who decides for themselves to take it. But coercive vax mandates and banning treatments for covid is a crime against humanity; and those words are not too strong. Just tell the truth while openly recognizing that all dynamic situations demand constant positional shifts. Hate to see Trump get tied up so much in past positions he can’t or won’t extricate himself from them. His strong suit has always been his honesty and willingness to tell the truth to the American people. I would respect both men more if they expressed full realism on these issues which are particularly pressing in part because they are not simple and do not lend themselves well to sound bites or slogans. We the people can and will understand a deep nuanced stance on covid and covid vaxs. ABN

IVERMECTIN is actually approved for covid on NIH website

The dose most commonly used in clinical trials is IVM 0.2–0.6 mg/kg PO given as a single dose or as a once-daily dose for up to 5 days.

Table 2e. Characteristics of Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19

Not sure how hospitals, doctors, and pharmacists are getting around this unequivocal approval by NIH, but they are as we all know. If you have to argue or plead with a health obstructionist, this may help your case. ABN