When assessing the covid/vax risk-benefit, stuff like this has to be factored in. Big Tech, Legacy Media, and government are working hard to prevent scientific debate and to keep people uninformed about early treatments, where Dr Tyson’s clinical skills were outstanding. ABN
New emails reveal that Dr. Anthony Fauci conspired with Deep State operatives to silence and discredit any scientists who disagreed with his Covid-19 response – with the help of Big Tech giant Google.
The leaked emails reveal that Fauci and his team didn’t just ignore dissenting opinions, but they actively looked for ways to smear and discredit them as “conspiracy theorists” – even when it involved Nobel Laureate’s.
The image above is enlarged below. It is a dastardly order—“needs to be a devastating published take down”—from Francis Collins, the incurious fossil who heads the NIH and is unironically afraid of scientific debate or, worse, unaware of the necessity of having one. ABN
UPDATE: I have seen defenses of Collins saying he wrote “take down of its premises,” which he did. But the actual “quick and devastating” result of his order was a vicious takedown of those scientists and any others who held opinions different from his own. A lockstep (their word) bureaucratic attack on scientific debate during the worst pandemic in 100 years happened only because top health officials control billions of dollars in grants and thus, few dare disagree with them. Our system must be completely revamped so we never get people like Collins, Fauci, Birx, and Wallensky anywhere near the top of the govt food chain again; they are unfit for their offices and have proved this conclusively over the past two years. ABN
Ardern: “We’ve also seen the spread of misinformation on COVID…so we made it a priority to establish a ‘public interest journalism fund’…to keep New Zealanders informed”
Guessing that doesn’t include informing them the IFR is about that of seasonal flu? https://t.co/UNOetlnNvS
Disgraceful "journalism" – purposefully conflates my data-centric approach referencing cost:benefit of one specific novel medication with the Anti-V slur (a separate drug category issue)
Also "guilt by association" ploy
Scientific and data illiterate nonsense.
See short vid below
What do the inventor of mRNA technology; the lead author of the most downloaded paper on Covid-19 in the American Journal of Medicine; a former editor of the American Journal of Epidemiology; renowned epidemiologists at Harvard, Stanford, and Oxford; and France’s leading microbiologist – have in common?
They have all been censored by a repressive media network that most people have never heard of. This network has outrageously conceived and conveyed a “monopoly of legitimate information.”
Exposing this uncanny censorship of eminent voices is especially vital to the fate of children and youth, who are being aggressively targeted for low-benefit, sometimes lethal, inoculations.
Yet again I had to draw this graph myself, and yet again, the UK Health Security Agency wants you to know that these rates are extremely, totally, absolutely unadjusted.
Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) director Ed Humpherson met with UKHSA hours before they published their Week 43 report, demanding they do something about these awkward graphs. They responded by ditching the graphs altogether and calling every last number unadjusted. This failed to satisfy him, so in the days afterwards he issued this unbelievable open letter.
Well-worth perusing this article. It shows UK officials desperately trying to hide statistics showing the vaxxes have failed. See quote below from same link above. ABN
It remains the case that the surveillance report includes rates per 100,000 which can be used to argue that vaccines are not effective. I know that this is not the intention of the surveillance report, but the potential for misuse remains. In publishing these data, you need to address more comprehensively the risk that it misleads people into thinking that it says something about vaccine effectiveness.
“White Supremacy” is a mind-control focal point used to intimidate those who support traditional American values and laws. It is a near synonym to “patriot” which has become a near synonym to “insurrectionist.” These words and concepts were backed up by arrests and incarceration on exaggerated charges of “insurrectionists” on Jan 6. They are continually amplified by slanted reports in Legacy Media. This is pure mind-control, crowd control, propaganda. It is a KOBK move among many others, including erasure of history, designed to weaken opposition to ever increasing federal authoritarianism. ABN
Earlier this month, a rather extraordinary lawsuit was filed in Colorado on behalf of eight Michigan poll watchers against the most infamous third-party vendor in the world. (For the duration of this article, let’s call that overly litigious entity: Opinion Voting Systems or OVS.) The details contained in that lawsuit are striking for a number of reasons, and not the least of them is the “Lawfare” strategy that OVS employed to silence any criticism of the company. (The entire lawsuit can be found here.) This “lawsuit warfare” campaign was so extensive that it (allegedly) chilled the free speech of regular Americans who volunteered as poll watchers and didn’t make any public statements about the company at all: