We posted earlier today that Schumer and McConnell were plotting to not decertify the election if the states decertified their election results. In response, DeSantis privately communicated to McConnell, Rubio and R. Scott that he would order state law enforcement officers to arrest federal agents that attempt to enforce Biden’s laws and executive orders. (Read the attached screen shots to get all of the background info.) THIS WILL FORCE A LAWSUIT THAT WILL BE HEARD BY SCOTUS! The issue will be if the Senate can deny the ministerial act of certifying a federal election where the results have been recertified by the states. This suit will have standing, because SCOTUS will not be asked to void an election result based on fraud. That power belongs exclusively to the states.
continue reading…
Tag: crime
Statement from President Trump
AZ State Senator Wendy Rogers responds to DC Garland
We all know Garland will mess with results when they show fraud. His statement only proves how corrupt the federal govt has become. Moreover, Garland surely fears more states are going to audit their results. Best case will be more states show massive fraud, leading to a nation-wide audit showing election fraud is nation-wide. I say this is the best case because I am reasonably sure fraud happened nation-wide. Cleaning that up will be a major victory for USA against globalist usurpers. The worst fraud appears to have happened in corrupt Dem-run black cities, so expect cries of systemic rayciss from the feds as they marshal “defenses” against “white supremacy” and “voter suppression.” I hate saying the truth so openly but the country feels like diabolical 3rd grade intellectually so what options do we have left?
AZ AUDIT UPDATE: Paper ballot counting “nearly finished”
Flooding the Zone, Another Report of Hackers Stealing Personal Data of 26 Million Big Tech Platform Users
Color me increasingly suspicious of the sudden ‘uptick’ in cyber hacking reports. The timeline tells a bigger story and my hunch is this is the creation of cover for a future U.S. government position that audit outcomes should be ignored because cyber security breaches are common.
In March of this year the media reported about the U.S. Department of Homeland Security getting ready to hire public companies, individual contractors outside government, to scour public data and social media in order to provide information for the new “domestic terror watch lists.” From the description it appeared DHS was going to pay “big tech” (Google, Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, SnapChat, Twitter, etc.), via contracts, to hire and organize internal monitoring teams to assist the government by sending information on citizens they deem “dangerous”, ie “domestic extremists” {LINK}.
To facilitate that national security objective the Feds were going to need to work with outside government entities, FBI contractors, to permit access to monitoring systems. However, additionally interesting…. immediately after that DHS announcement suddenly there’s an uptick in cyber intrusions, pipelines hacked etc. Then the FBI says they recovered the ransom payment by knowing the private credentials to the hackers. That’s very fishy.
Now today:
continue reading…
AZ AUDIT UPDATE: “A comprehensive forensic audit that’s looking at last Nov election from every conceivable perspective”
Fauci credibility craters: only 40% believe him
As investigators pursue evidence that the COVID-19 virus may have originated in a Chinese research laboratory, many voters doubt that Dr. Anthony Fauci has told the truth about American funding of such research.
Only 40% of Voters Think Dr. Fauci Told the Truth About Virus Research
Antrim County election management system was REMOTELY logged into anonymously on 11/05/2020 and again on 11/17/2020
There is more in this string here: direct link.
White girl, 14, stabbed to death by adult black male
According to court documents, Kollie reportedly stabbed Paulsen over the course of 20 minutes in an attack that was partially picked up on surveillance footage from a local store.
link
Were US actors behind the release of C19?
Okay, straight talk. This discovery makes the suspicions of an intentionally released Pandemic virus, with a political intent, to “STOP TRUMP” look exponentially more plausible. SARS = Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, the deadly consequence within COVID-19.
With people beginning to recognize that U.S. government officials and the intelligence community have been less than honest, and in some cases downright lying, surrounding the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus; and when we overlay the political motives in the background of mass narrative deflection from media and other institutions; and when we consider the known lengths that people inside the U.S. government were willing to go in their efforts to eliminate President Trump; discovering that President Obama’s administration technically authorized the restart of “gain of function” research (biological weaponization of SARS virus) just days before President Trump took office… is way more than alarming. My hunch is this link might even disappear [SEE HERE]
Interesting Timing – Obama Administration Lifted Block on “Gain of Function Research” Just Eleven Days Before President Trump Took Office, January 9, 2017
We don’t know enough to credibly say who done it, but the list of candidates is narrowing. I presented a scenario where recent evidence of C19 “progenitors” having appeared in China as early as 2017 may indicate that actors in China released C19 deliberately. Ron Unz has written extensively on the view that rogue actors within the Trump administration (he names Pompeo and Bolton) released C19 in Wuhan to damage China. The article above by Sundance argues the evidence (without fully concluding) that rogue Obama leftovers and Deep State actors released C19 to remove Trump from office. This thesis also claims that a C19 release by DS actors had been planned for 2020 no matter who became president. The purpose was to use the pandemic to seize power through the misuse of government agencies.
I see strong evidence for China having done it. And now an equally strong argument that DS actors in the US did it. Ron Unz places too much faith in China while ignoring the horrible behavior of the US C19 response. I try never to view the future as a roulette wheel against which we place bets, so I am not betting. The world is in crisis and it truly seems that someone deliberately made that happen. It could be USA, USA plus other powers, China, USA plus China, or someone else or a different combination of any of them.
COVID, Ivermectin, and the Crime of the Century: Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein
The NSA database
words 417
Firstly, that database is a sociologist’s wet dream. It is without question the greatest sociological analytical tool ever to come into existence.
The NSA database—using just metadata alone—is capable of discovering and describing in near-perfect detail nearly all social networks in the world.
It is possible that some very secretive groups figured out which way the wind was blowing twenty years ago and have kept away from all electronic surveillance since then, but I doubt that even they can be certain that their membership is not known, or knowable, to the NSA.
In addition to being able to find and analyze all, or virtually all, groups and networks in the world (secret or otherwise), the NSA almost certainly has the capability to reach back years into the content of those groups’ phone calls and other forms of communication.
This makes the database even more than a sociologist’s wet dream. It is also a tool for exceptional good or evil.
First, the evil—anyone with access to the database can spy on virtually anyone anywhere and use the information gained to blackmail, steal inventions or investment ideas, bribe, intimidate, or otherwise do bad stuff behind the scenes.
For the good, the database has the power to figure out groups that are doing bad things and stop them. The database could be used as a massive national and international “lie-detector” or “shit detector.” Just about any group of people up to anything unsavory should be discoverable through the database.
So who controls it? Is there one person at the top? Or a group? Who watches the group?
I am all but certain we will never be rid of that database. If by some miracle the US destroys the NSA database, some other country will surely set one up.
So liberty and goodness now mean that we have to figure out how to make sure the people controlling the database are good people. That they will never do bad things with the information available to them.
How do we do that? Is there any conceivable politics that can bring that about? We need databases watching databases all of which are controlled by groups that are watched by other groups. If we have perfectly reliable lie-detectors, could we establish groups like that? Is there any way forward other than massive transparency of everyone’s life?
It looks to me like our traditional political system is finished. Checks and balances and individual rights are meaningless in the face of that database.
American Buddhist Net 