…When then-President Petro Poroshenko nationalized Kolomoyskyi’s PrivatBank (which was also operated by fellow Jew Gennadiy (Zvi Hirsch) Bogolyubov) in 2016, Kolomoyskyi threw his influence behind fellow Jew and popular actor Volodymyr Zelenskyy, now a hero and darling of the Western media. Zelenskyy’s campaign, strangely enough, began with his appearance on Kolomoyskyi’s media channel as the star of the television series Servant of the People, where he played the role of the president of Ukraine. In the series, Zelenskyy’s character was a high-school history teacher in his 30s who won the presidential election after a viral video showed him ranting against government corruption in Ukraine. In retrospect, the show was a masterwork of social engineering and life imitating art.
There was initially some unease that the whole thing might be too obvious. “There are legitimate reasons to worry about the future of Ukrainian Jewry,” said Vladislav Davidzon, the editor-in-chief of the magazine Odessa Review. “Having a Jewish president, who is also backed by a picaresque Jewish oligarch might cause any failings to be directed at the Jewish community.” He needn’t have worried. Zelenskyy sky-rocketed to prominence, and one of his earliest measures was to nominate fellow Jew Volodymyr Groysman as Prime Minister and target Poroshenko, setting in motion a sequence of events that would result in the reversal of the nationalization of PrivatBank and the return of the bank to Kolomoyskyi. Although posturing as an anti-corruption populist, Zelenskyy’s links to Kolomoyskyi have continued to dog him, and in October 2021 it was revealed via the Pandora Papers that Zelenskyy, who constantly denied that he was a “puppet” of the Jewish oligarch, and his associates had received $40 million into offshore accounts from funds linked to Kolomoyskyi.
link
Tag: history
UKRAINE: By tying itself to a reckless and dangerous America, the Ukrainians made a blunder that client states will study for years to come
…While the timing of Putin’s attack on Ukraine is no doubt connected to a variety of factors, including the Russian dictator’s read on U.S. domestic politics and the preferences of his own superpower sponsor in Beijing, the sense that Ukraine poses a meaningful threat to Russia is not a product of Putin’s paranoia—or of a sudden desire to restore the power and prestige of the Soviet Union, however much Putin might wish for that to happen. Rather, it is a geopolitical threat that has grown steadily more pressing and been employed with greater recklessness by Americans and Ukrainians alike over the past decade.
That Ukraine has allowed itself to be used as a pawn against a powerful neighbor is in part the fault of Kyiv’s reckless and corrupt political class. But Ukraine is not a superpower that owes allies and client-states judicious leadership—that’s the role of the United States. And in that role, the United States has failed Ukraine. More broadly, the use of Ukraine as a goad against enemies domestic and foreign has recklessly damaged the failing yet necessary European security architecture that America spent 75 years building and maintaining.
link
Essay rambles a little bit but provides important background to what is happening in Ukraine today. ABN
Background on Ukraine and info on vaccine harm
Washington’s Crocodile Tears Over Ukraine’s Destruction
The bitter truth is that Washington’s foreign policy establishment never actually considered Zelensky – or his predecessor Poroshenko – to be allies or partners of the United States. Overflowing with a toxic mix of ignorance, arrogance, and extreme cynicism, Washington’s elites have always viewed Ukraine as a tool to “regime-change” a Russia that, after its post-Yeltsin recovery, would no longer take its direction from them.
The false gods of American exceptionalism are jealous ones indeed.
The American foreign policy establishment wanted a perpetual “Yanks to the Rescue” Russia, whereby US “consultants” and spooks would ensure that the most obsequious candidate would continue to win and rule. A string of Russian presidents who would, à la Shevardnadze and a whole string of other post-Soviet leaders, run the country like a family business: lots of biznis deals for family members…and maybe 10 percent for the “big guy.”
Americans are victims (willing or not) of a mass media system as propagandistic as any that existed during Soviet Communism. The “party line” is established and it is unwaveringly followed whether the favored flavor is Fox or MSNBC. When it became obvious that Yeltsin’s one-time understudy, Vladimir Putin, wasn’t going to play that way, the party line came down that he must be demonized.
link
2015 FLASHBACK: John Mearsheimer had a better idea for how to treat Ukraine
He makes a good point but Ukraine was already at that time overrun with domestic and international corruption, particularly American corruption. On a small scale Ukraine looks like what Russia might have become if Putin had not become president. American foreign policy almost always treats Putin as our archenemy because he opposes American interference in Russia. A main reason I liked Donald Trump early on was his stated intention to form better relations with Russia. US and Russia are natural allies. Together with Europe, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, and Canada, we could form a “top of the world” political and trade alliance that would generate great wealth and also be able to check aggressive ambitions from countries to the south, as we are seeing from China today. ABN
“For what it’s worth, I just met Kary Mullis’s ex at a conference. She’s certain they killed him”: Michael Senger
For what it’s worth, I just met Kary Mullis’s ex at a conference. She’s certain they killed him.
https://t.co/G1FlUvUENd
Originally tweeted by Michael P Senger (@MichaelPSenger) on February 24, 2022.
“Struggle to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese race”
The above image appears to come from an airport in China. The words say exactly what is in the English headline above. 民族 means “race” in Chinese. This notion of the importance of race in China dates back especially to the writings and speeches of Sun Yat-sen, the “father of modern China.” And Sun meant the Han Chinese race. I personally see nothing wrong with Han Chinese wanting to emphasize their race. Almost all people in the world do that and/or think that way.
In an American or Western context, almost any use the word race is automatically processed as bad. If you place the sentence 为实现中华民族伟大复兴努力奋斗 in Google translate, it will return the following rendering in English: “Work hard to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.” This is due to decades of propaganda changing what Sun Yat-sen actually meant by his Three Principles of the People, which he clearly explained at the time. If you doubt this, take note of how Tibetans and Uighurs are treated in China and what happened to the Mongolians in Inner Mongolia. Or just look closely at the cartoon above. ABN
JFK: More evidence he was NOT shot by Oswald; bullet hole in limo windshield penetrated from the front, not the rear
When a senior manager there, George S. Whitaker, came to work two days after the assassination, he was ordered to immediately report to the glass plant lab. He was let in through locked doors and found two of his men had already removed the limousine windshield.
As Whitaker said in a recorded interview: “And the windshield had a bullet hole in it, coming from the outside through…it was a good, clean bullet hole, right straight through, from the front. And you can tell, when the bullet hits the windshield, like when you hit a rock or something, what happens? The back chips out and the front may just have a pinhole in it…this had a clean round hole in the front and fragmentation coming out the back.”
In an interview a few months later he added: “The hole was about 4 or 6 inches to the right of the rear view mirror [as viewed from the front]. The impact had come from the front of the windshield. If you have spent 40 years in the glass [illegible] you know which way the impact was from.”
link
SPYGATE: What we knew in 2018
Grand Jury: Historical Background
Rumble — Introduction
00:00:45 – Alex Thomson (Former GCHQ Officer)
00:46:55 – Matthew Ehret (Journalist, Author, Historian)
01:57:58 – Brian Gerrish (Public Speaker & Investigative Journalist, United Kingdom)
02:21:25 – Debi Evans (Former NHS Registered Nurse)
03:04:00 – Whitney Webb (Author & Investigative Journalist, USA)
Whistleblower Statements
03:32:15 – Introduction
03:36:49 – Footage provided by Whistleblower #2
03:40:45 – Footage provided by Roman Mironov
03:43:00 – Roman Mironov (Human Rights Defender)
03:46:20 – James Bush (Former Engineering and Operations Manager for Infectious Disease Research Center at Colorado University)
04:29:06 – Dr. Silvia Berendt (Former Legal Consultant at WHO and Pandemic Management Expert, Austria)
04:51:00 – Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger (International Health Scientist & Researcher, Switzerland)
05:45:45 – Closing remarks
Alex Thompson on elite philosophical paradigms
Alex Thompson: City of London and historical background of world economics today
How the extremely heavy magnetic doors on the East side of the Capitol were opened on January 6th
The extraordinary story of how patient access to COVID treatments was denied, eventually involving witch hunts of physicians who dared to treat patients
In 2020, I compiled a list of over 50 ways authorities and pharma companies in multiple countries stopped the use of the chloroquine drugs for COVID. This was (and is) a stunning collection, which has been widely read and reproduced on many websites. When you read it, you are astounded to learn that all the US (and many international) public health agencies took many different actions to increase deaths and destruction from COVID and prolong the pandemic. “Avoiding the Trump drug” served as a great cover story. Taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID was equated to drinking bleach.
But here’s the kicker: the authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID before there was a COVID… because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses. But they hushed it up.
link
FRANCE: Éric Zemmour on the Great Replacement and Civic Nationalism
The conservative French-Jewish pundit Éric Zemmour may well become France’s next president. The centerpiece of his campaign is opposition to the Great Replacement. The latter means the ongoing trend of substitution of the indigenous populations of France and Europe by non-European immigrants, in particular by Africans and Muslims.
In his most recent book, Zemmour writes the following on the Great Replacement:
I have the impression that no politician rightly apprehends what is at stake: the death of France as we knew her. . . . One simply needs to look at the films of [the 1960s and 70s] to realize this. The “great replacement” is not a myth, nor a conspiracy, but an implacable process. This vital identitarian question renders all other questions subsidiary, even the most essential such as education, industry, social protection, or the place of France in the world. I am sure that no candidate – not even Marine Le Pen – will dare to impose this identitarian and civilizational quarrel in the campaign. . . . Only [the far-left] Jean-Luc Mélenchon dares to mention the subject, but only to glorify the future of a mixed-race, “creolized” France …[1]
Zemmour’s central campaign promise is “zero immigration” to France (presumably not including immigration from the European Union). In addition, he would deport foreign criminals and would deprive criminal dual nationals of French citizenship (a suitable prelude to deportation). Significantly, French citizens of Turkish or Arab origin typically are dual nationals by default.
link
American Buddhist Net 