A feast: Harpy Hillary’s emails; Vegas shooting by an FBI sniper; Steve Jobs’ letter on HIV; Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iran, Israel; the military-financial complex; Mafiosi galore; CIA agents arrested for rape; Conspiracy Heaven; CIA false-flags; WHO pandemic – and more.
Shawn is actively involved (perhaps unwitting) in CIA and Co. military-media mind control programs stemming from MK-ULTRA.
Shawn’s former friend and SRS researcher became self-aware as a subject in MONARCH after I contacted them in early 2023. They were cut off from Shawn immediately – then there were attempts to route them to Monroe Institute – which is 100% known to be involved and is where many are sent for reprogramming or closeout.
This isn’t about slamming Shawn or the show, but issues have already been whitewashed. This is dangerous for the American people. SRS served just enough to hook a very important demographic and is an extremely effective limited hangout and narrative steering operation.
I have no idea what to make of this any more than I do of Shawn Ryan. Our universal inability to be certain of who or what is in power and what information is correct or false is the core basis of KOBK game theory. Shawn himself cannot be sure of where he is situated in whatever hierarchy he imagines he may be in. Neither can the hierarchs at the top, save in rare situations, be completely sure they are really at the top. Bosses get offed all the time. Our uncertainty of all information does not go away as we become more powerful, influential, or wealthy. Who controls Elon Musk? Surely, Elon knows, right? No, he has no idea if who he believes are his masters are his masters. Those ‘masters’ might just be messengers, handlers, spies. If one hierarch decisively defeats his rival he can probably be sure the rival has been defeated, but KOBK does not stop there because someone might stab him in the back in the next second. People at the top are surely holding themselves in a tight grid of oaths, omerta, volitional bribe material, and the sure threat of death and disgrace if they break rank. The reward is wealth and power. Top people probably can and do quit or retire but their oaths remain. Xi Jinping is an example of a particularly ruthless/strong hierarch. But now that China is declining, his hold is weakening. I would not be surprised if he were overthrown soon. It is important to note that Xi’s hold on power is weakening due to his bad policies, but more importantly due to growing popular opposition to his leadership. That’s all we the plebs ever have, but it is a lot. ABN
I take all info with salt. Is SR a Tucker Carlson of his domain? No way to know. Greer? In a global (and cosmic) environment, all of us are playing some part. Each life matters. At what level is information valuable or distracting? Information considered occupies brain-space. All influencers are, in an important sense, is occupiers of brain-space and/or disseminators of information that occupies brain-space. ABN
The central argument is this. “Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (“the Act”), as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.”
Congress enacted a law that effectively bans the social media app TikTok, or at the very least, forces the sale of the company to a non-foreign owned entity. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on the First Amendment aspect. Biden signed the law that requires TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance to divest from the app or face a ban on U.S. networks and app stores.
Mitch McConnell [SEE HERE] and Mike Pence [See Here] are asking the Supreme Court to support the law and support the forced sale or ban. However, President Trump is urging the Supreme Court to be very careful. [SEE HERE]
After initially supporting the ban on Tik Tok in 2020, President Trump changed his opinion and now contemplates whether a ban against the popular platform is in America’s best interest.
…Many people have wondered what changed President Trump’s mind, with some pointing to President Trump’s meeting with TikTok CEO Shou Chew at Mar-a-Lago earlier this month. Additionally, Elon Musk and the Silicon Valley tech team, including JD Vance, are opposed to Tik Tok. However, the shift in Trump’s thinking since 2020 makes sense if you look at the timeline.
TikTok is a content and information platform that presents a significant issue from an American perspective. It is a Chinese platform available in the USA, but American platforms are banned in China. As a consequence, there is a particular conflict on geopolitical interests. Thus, in 2020 President Trump was against TikTok as an equity/fairness issue.
However, if most or all of the USA social media platforms are under the influence and control of government, which they are. And when President Trump became a victim from that influence and control, which he did. And when the only counterpoint for pushback against the Mis-Dis-Mal information scheme of the U.S. Govt., is to use an external platform to deliver information…. Then the relative issues in the platform discrimination argument take on a different context.
If you look at the timeline, after he was silenced by the U.S government’s influence in Big Tech, President Trump changed his position on Tik Tok.
For the study, the researchers looked at the interaction between mother and child over several months. The babies came into the lab for the first time at the age of 6 months, while their final visit was when they were 18 months old. As they engaged in various play situations, the interactions and imitations of mother and child were analyzed.
The longitudinal study shows that the more sensitive a mother was in her interactions with her six-month-old child and the more often she imitated the infant, the greater the child’s ability was at the age of 18 months to imitate others.
In the interaction between parents and child, mutual imitation is a sign of communication. Parents respond to the signals given by the child and reflect and amplify them. A mutual imitation of actions and gestures develops. “These experiences create connections between what the child feels and does on the one hand and what it sees on the other. Associations are formed. The child’s visual experience is connected to its own motor activity,” says Markus Paulus, explaining the neuro-cognitive process.
Children learn a variety of skills through imitation, such as how to use objects, cultural gestures like waving, and the acquisition of language. “Children are incredible imitators. Mimicry paves the way to their further development. Imitation is the start of the cultural process toward becoming human,” says Markus Paulus. In psychology, the theory that the ability to imitate is inborn held sway for a long time. The LMU study is further evidence that the ability is actually acquired.
Mutual imitation and/or rapport are fundamental to interpersonal communication and a constant of it. FIML practice is a metacognitive method for making these processes ‘objective’ and thus mutually understandable, analyzable, and correctable or transformable as needed or desired. FIML works with objective material, which is defined as material both partners agree on. Real-world, real-time mutually agreed upon moments of micro communication discovered during FIML practice are some of the best objective psychological material you will ever acquire. Analyzing it with your partner is a total blast! There is no other way to do it except through FIML practice. ABN
UPDATE: This study reveals the profound importance of imitation for the infant brain. Imitation is one of the first things humans learn and it establishes a basis for social interactions from then on. Imitation is a major foundation of all cultures. People within any culture always imitate each other a lot. This includes adults who form new cultures or conform to deep transitions within their already accepted cultures. Often, cultural transitions are so large, the original culture is lost to time. This instinct to keep up with the group through imitation is a major factor in behavioral mind-control. This video provides an excellent example of how blunt, crude, nasty and deeply fear-based mind-controlled cultural transitions often are. Not only are viewers lured into being terrified of the invisible virus, they are also bullied into conforming to the one and only way to save themselves—taking a dangerous and untested vax. When children and then babies were also sucked into this whirlpool of anti-science, all morality was gone and all that was left was fear and insane conformity. If the mind-controllers learned anything from this, they will probably leave pregnant women and babies alone next time. More likely is they will cause even greater fear. ABN
Despite the intuition that strongly held beliefs are particularly difficult to change, the data on error correction indicate that general information errors that people commit with a high degree of belief are especially easy to correct. (Emphasis added.)
According to the study, this happens due to:
…enhanced attention and encoding that results from a metacognitive mismatch between the person’s confidence in their responses and the true answer.
This is exactly what happens when a FIML query shows the questioner that his/her assumptions about what their partner’s thoughts or intentions were wrong.
Initially, FIML partners may experience some embarrassment or disbelief at being wrong. But since FIML queries are generally based on negative impressions, after some practice being shown to be wrong will typically produce feelings of relief and even delight.
A FIML query will generally arise out of a state of “enhanced attention” and usually further increase it by being spoken about. Incidentally, this is probably the most difficult aspect of FIML practice—controlling the emotions that accompany enhanced attention, especially when that attention concerns our own emotional reactions.
With continued practice of FIML, however, even strongly held erroneous interpersonal beliefs will be fairly easily corrected whenever they are discovered during a FIML discussion. Correcting core false beliefs (mistaken interpretations) has a wide-ranging, beneficial effect on all aspects of a person’s life.
Since the hypercorrection effect discussed in the linked study only occurs during moments of enhanced attention, the FIML technique of focusing quickly on good data agreed upon by both partners can be seen as a way of inducing states of enhanced attention that will lead to deep changes in both partners. This technique (using good data) also turns the discussion from one about feelings to one about “information,” which the study finds makes errors “especially easy to correct.”
Furthermore, since FIML practice tends to deal with very small incidents, the enhanced attention FIML induces works like a laser that quickly and painlessly excises erroneous thoughts and feelings while they are still small and have not been allowed to grow into full-blown emotional reactions.
Well, the Jewish Lobby is at it again. In the latest kerfuffle over “Holocaust denial,” Jews and their sycophants are in an uproar over a podcast interview aired on September 2 in which Tucker Carlson spoke at length with a “popular historian” named Darryl Cooper. The two-hour episode is titled “The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe”—a bit of a stretch for a single show, but with the central theme that conventional or orthodox history is often wrong about events small and large, and thus frequently in need of revision. History is not only written by the victors, it is sustained by powerful lobbies that have a vested interest in a certain interpretation of past events. This much is so obvious that it scarcely needs mentioning.
And yet, when it comes to World War Two and especially the Holocaust, all rules go out the window. The “victors” cannot be named; alternate interpretations are not allowed; and revisionism is declared a crime. In the interview, Cooper offers the mildest of mild statements regarding his thoughts on WW2 and on what happened to “civilians and prisoners of war” at that time. Two points seemed to have raised the greatest ire: that Churchill, not Hitler, was the true villain of the war; and that the millions of people who died—presumably meaning millions of Jews—were, in effect, accidental victims rather than targets of a premediated and planned genocide. Our cultural guardians are upset by the first point but truly enraged by the second.
The horror of stating such views was too much for both our Jewish media and for our Jewish-inspired Biden regime. The headlines are alarming: “Tucker Carlson Criticized for Hosting Holocaust Revisionist” (NYT); “Tucker Carlson Welcomes a Hitler Apologist to His Show” (NYT, Michelle Goldberg); “White House condemns Tucker Carlson’s ‘Nazi propaganda’ interview as ‘disgusting and sadistic insult’” (CNN); “Tucker Carlson Blasted for Interview with Holocaust Revisionist” (The Hill). CNN reports that the Biden administration took the unusual step of publicly “denouncing Tucker Carlson” and his guest. Deputy press secretary Andrew Bates issued a formal statement, not only calling the interview “a disgusting and sadistic insult to all Americans” but also condemning Carlson for “giving a microphone to a Holocaust denier who spreads Nazi propaganda.” Bates’ chief concern seems to be with “the over 6 million Jews who were genocidally murdered by Adolf Hitler.” “Hitler was one of the most evil figures in human history,” Bates assures us—“full stop.” Certainly no revisionism allowed in this most “freedom-loving” of nations.
This whole incident is worthy of some reflection. Let me start with what exactly Cooper said. Here are the relevant statements (from 46:30 to 49:00):
When [the Germans] went into the East, in 1941, they launched a war where they were completely unprepared to deal with the millions and millions of prisoners of war, local political prisoners, and so forth, that they were going to have to handle. They went in with no plan for that. And they just threw these people into camps and millions of people ended up dead there.
You have letters as early as July, August 1941 from commandants of these makeshift camps that they’re setting up for these millions of people who were surrendering or people they are rounding up. And it’s two months after [Operation] Barbarossa was launched [in June], and they’re writing back to the high command in Berlin saying, “We can’t feed these people…” And one of them actually says, “Rather than wait for them all to slowly starve this winter, wouldn’t it be more humane to just finish them off quickly now?”
At the end of the day, [Hitler] launched that war [against the USSR] with no plan to care for the millions and millions of civilians and prisoners of war that were going to come under [his] control. And millions of people died because of that.
Good essay, food for thought. Provides a brief, interesting outline of the information chaos surrounding WW2 and who died the most and why and who to believe. When there are laws against interpretations of historical events, you can be sure something is deeply wrong. ABN
Non-compliance is the strongest and best power we the plebs have. Some sort of grapevine or information tendrils crisscrossed the nation and produced widespread, unified non-compliance with the covid vax, with downstream good effects on childhood vaxxes. If we absorb the importance of this—pass it along through the grapevine—we will be in an ever bettering position to bring sanity, harmony, reason and decency back into our society. Those who now rule cannot be trusted in almost any Western institution. But those who rule cannot overrule a non-compliant majority or significant minority. There are many things we can all agree on. Our agreement does not have to be perfect. A man who wants to call himself a woman, OK, no problem. A man, or anyone, who wants to castrate boys, no. Mind-control works by convincing enough people of something. If they cannot get enough people to fall for the mind-control, it stops working or doesn’t work at all. ABN
Turns out she did not personally see the sharpshooters kill ‘the guy in the Water Tower’, but heard someone say that. She has other information about the venue and the day that is interesting. Worth viewing if you want to keep abreast of what is known about the assassination, but there is no smoking gun in her testimony. ABN
Besides all the many signs Crooks gave off, don’t SS snipers and agents use binoculars or sights? At the second congressional hearing after Cheatle bombed at the first one, the new boss said SS snipers could only see the ‘crown of Crooks’ head’. How is that not enough? Recall new boss showed a still photo of the crown of Crooks’ head as part of his show-and-tell excuse. That’s disgracefully absurd, ridiculous. Our government needs a total overhaul. ABN
A Paris 2024 Olympics spokesperson admitted the controversial drag show version of “The Last Supper” seen in Friday’s opening ceremony was indeed inspired by the iconic da Vinci mural — despite attempting to vehemently deny it following fierce backlash.
“Thomas Jolly took inspiration from Leonardo da Vinci’s famous painting to create the setting,” an Olympics spokesperson admitted to The Post in a statement on Saturday, referring to the opening ceremony creative director.
“He is not the first artist to make a reference to what is a world-famous work of art. From Andy Warhol to ‘The Simpsons,’ many have done it before him,” the statement continued.
I like looking at the Daily Mail and NY Post to keep in touch. Each publication often runs very good stories in the midst of everything else they run. Right now, I am going to switch from mainly looking at the Daily Mail to mainly looking at the NY Post for that kind of material. The reason I am switching is the Daily Mail has for some time been writing every headline as a clickbait tease. They provide a hint and expect you to click to find out what’s inside. I can’t stand that and plan to stop spending more than a few seconds on that publication. From now on, the NY Post will get my few minutes in the morning when I check to see if the world is still here. ABN
American Buddhist Net 