Massive wildfires are tearing through Patagonia, displacing communities and destroying protected land. As the fires spread, local residents have begun reporting something unsettling: foreign individuals caught allegedly setting fires, with multiple reports pointing to Israelis.
Authorities say investigations are ongoing.
Patagonia is not just wilderness, it is one of the most resource-rich, sparsely populated regions on Earth:
• Freshwater reserves
• Fertile land
• Strategic geography
• Low population density
It is also a region that has long attracted foreign interest, legal and otherwise. This brings up a term many Argentines know well: Plan Andinia.
Plan Andinia refers to a mid-20th-century geopolitical concept, discussed in Argentine military and intelligence circles, proposing the establishment of a Jewish state or autonomous zone inPatagonia under certain conditions.
Whether speculative or strategic, it was real enough to be studied, debated, and feared. Plan Andinia was never implemented. But ideas do not need to be implemented to shape behavior. They need only to justify long-term positioning.
Land acquisition, NGO influence, tourism corridors, dual citizenship flows, security cooperation these are far more common tools than tanks.
Argentina’s south has seen:
• Large-scale foreign land purchases
• Restricted-access estates
• Private conservation zones with opaque governance
• Foreign security personnel operating under civilian cover
Wildfires introduce a new variable that Israelis will love…. forced displacement. Throughout history, environmental destruction has often preceded land reorganization.
Not because fires prove intent but because chaos creates opportunity:
• Emergency powers
• Property transfers
• International “assistance”
• Reframing of sovereignty as “management”
There are credible reports of Israelis caught setting fires on the hiking trails of Patagonia. In 2011, an Israeli was caught setting a fire that burned 17,000 acres of Chilean Patagonia.
When communities feel their land is being taken, reshaped, or destabilized without consent, they remember history.
Argentina has its own history with foreign interference, IMF restructuring, and externally imposed “solutions.” In that context, Patagonia is not peripheral. It is strategic. And Plan Andinia persists not as a plan, but as a symbol of vulnerability.
Wildfires should unite a country in defense of its land, not silence discussion.
History doesn’t repeat verbatim but it rhymes, especially when land is burning.
I have read that The land in question is legally protected and cannot be sold unless it is burned in a wildfire; then it can be sold and Milei is apparently doing just that. ABN
If they do a good job, this is reasonable. Knocking out narco-terrorist cartels is mandatory for USA since the cartels not only do bad things but also have infiltrated into the heart of American politics, especially at the state level in CA and the Southwest.
That alone is reason enough to arrest him. I deeply hope he sings and Trump busts any American who participated in the treasonous voting malfeasance. ABN
This is a huge issue if fully exposed and arrests happen. It’s also tied to massive NGO, Somali and immigration scams linked to Dems and global leftists. Trump has promised 2026 will be a strong year. We can already see the direction he is moving in. This will likely involve similar scams in Europe being exposed and causing public outcry. ABN
They are attacking Candace with the Cassandra complex trope in fiction
The “Cassandra Truth” trope in movies is when a flawed or “crazy” person uncovers a massive conspiracy, but no one believes them because their past gets weaponized to discredit everything. Sound familiar? It’s exactly what’s happening with Mitch Snow and Candace Owens.
Take “Conspiracy Theory” (1997): Mel Gibson’s paranoid taxi driver rants about wild plots, so when he nails a real one involving the CIA, everyone dismisses him as unhinged. Or “12 Monkeys” (1995): Bruce Willis’s time-traveler warns of a virus apocalypse, but his erratic history lands him in psych wards—turns out he’s spot on.
Snow claims he stumbled on a secret Fort Huachuca meeting tied to Charlie Kirk’s assassination eve. Docs confirm he was detained there. But critics flood with his messy past (abuse allegations, military fibs) instead of probing the claims. It’s the trap: Smear the messenger, ignore the message. If he’s lying, prove it with facts—not character assassination. Don’t let Hollywood scripts play out in real life. Verify first.
The “Cassandra Truth” trope comes from Greek mythology: Cassandra, daughter of King Priam of Troy, was granted prophecy by Apollo but cursed so no one would believe her after she rejected him. She foretold Troy’s fall and disasters, yet was dismissed as mad. This evolved into the “Cassandra complex” in psychology (coined in 1949 by philosopher Gaston Bachelard, expanded by analysts like Laurie Layton Schapira), describing valid warnings ignored due to the messenger’s perceived unreliability.
It’s exactly what’s playing out with Mitch Snow and Candace Owens. Snow claims he stumbled on a secret Fort Huachuca meeting tied to Charlie Kirk’s assassination eve—docs confirm his detention there. But critics hammer his past (abuse claims, military issues) instead of investigating the allegations.
This is what all of us who know something very important and devastating fear, along with being killed or drugged into psychosis. Attacks like this are predictable and often work. They are a very strong indication that the story is serious and true, or mostly true. In most cases, dangerous stories are also complex and, typically, the perpetrators are better at weaving the coverup than we are seeing with this one. Expect also a lot of swearing and screaming at the whistleblowers who are over the target. ABN
There are several obvious reasons this is happening. But the one rarely mentioned mainstream is everyone knows 10/7 was a MIHOP attack, which 1000000% undermines any moral authority Israel has to do mass murder in Gaza. Kelly is no dummy and surely knows this. ABN
The Black Vault just forced the full release of the Joint Psychological Operations Task Force (JPOTF) Headquarters Master Training Guide – a 331-page doctrine on how the U.S. military runs large-scale psychological operations to shape perceptions, influence behavior, and lock in narratives during crises. Key takeaways from the now-unredacted doc:
PSYOP task forces integrate with joint commands to convey selected information to audiences, alter attitudes/behavior (>20% measurable change goal), and support broader Information Operations (IO) – including offensive/defensive tactics with OPSEC, electronic warfare, and deception.
Heavy focus on media selection/manipulation: Using radio/TV/leaflets/print/audiovisual to achieve >75% coverage in target areas, select themes/symbols, and monitor/counter enemy narratives.
Post-event management: Assess effectiveness (bomb damage assessment-style for psy impact), consolidate gains in “occupied” or crisis areas, shift loyalties, publicize reforms, and use AARs (after-action reviews) to refine doctrine and control future messaging. Integration with intelligence (J2 for target packages), logistics for rapid product dissemination, and plans (J5) to derive objectives aligned with national guidance.
This is textbook narrative control: Reenact trauma (like TPUSA’s tent replica?), flood media with approved themes, degrade alternative voices, and reinforce the “official” story to induce desired behaviors.
Sound familiar? The rush to call Charlie’s death a “lone wolf” while smearing investigators (Candace, Mitch) as conspiracy nuts? The emotional exploitation at AmFest? This manual blueprints it all.
Fort Huachuca note: Despite deep ties to intel/EW/drone training, the manual mentions ZERO about Fort Huachuca (or Arizona bases). Named locations are Fort Bragg (PSYOP HQ), PA/MN/CA units – no Huachuca link here.
But the doctrine? Perfectly matches attempts to contain the growing questions around secret meetings, drones overhead, family defense contracts, and EMP disruptions.
This isn’t foreign-only – the tactics are universal for “influence.”
To say that I am happy with President Trump’s approach toward the use of White House emissaries to conduct official business around the capture mechanisms of the administrative state would be an understatement. I’m positively thrilled to watch this untraditional approach in action.
Are there approaches, strategies and general things I would prefer to see differently; sure, there are. However, I’m just an audience member without any need to keep gravity maintained while figuring out ways to satisfy billionaire donors, key interests and strategic partners. On this balancing act, President Trump is doing awesome work.
President Trump is ducking and weaving through some of the deepest Machiavellian constructs, while maintaining forward progress.
To put context to it, these creeps have had four years to strategize how to control Trump and manipulate policy with their retention of all sorts of government agencies in alignment with the status quo. Yet, remarkably President Trump is dancing through their deep state minefield while keeping dozens of plates spinning on sticks. The use of non-traditional emissaries is really making them angry.
Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin has long said publicly he does not consider America or the American people to be adversaries of Russia. Instead, Vladimir Putin views the CIA as his adversary; he is always clear to draw the distinction.
The Deep State does not like President Trump’s use of emissaries to conduct foreign policy. In fact, they oppose it strongly; they hate it.
That is exactly why this approach is needed, and it is very good to see it being done.
The “emissary” is the person who carries the word of President Trump to any person identified by President Trump. The emissary is very much like a tape recording of President Trump in human form. The emissary travels to a location, meets a particular person or group, and then recites the opinion of the President. The words spoken by the emissary, are the words of President Trump.
The IC cannot inject themselves into this dynamic; that is why it is so valuable.
The emissary then hears the response from the intended person or group, repeats it back to them to ensure he/she will return with clarity of intent as expressed, and then returns to the office of the presidency and repeats the reply for the President. The emissary recites back exactly what he was /is told.
This process is critical when you understand how thoroughly compromised the full Executive Branch is. More importantly, this process becomes even more critical when you accept the Intelligence Community will lie to the office of the President to retain their power and position.
It is important to keep this in mind. You never get everything you want in politics, but Trump is doing more than any other president in recent history, while the odds and forces against him are powerful and many. ABN
This video is appearing today on social media as if it were new, but is actually from an incident in Henan in 2019. Read comments at the link above for a variety of reactions. Bullying is not uncommon in China, though as with everything in China, there are no reliable statistics. In Japan it is widely known that bullying is a serious problem. ABN
__________
Chinese translation:
「打她!」(多次重複)
「踹她!」
「別錄了!」
受害者哭喊:「不要!」 「啊!」(尖叫與求饒)
English Translation:
Victim’s cries: “No!” “Don’t!” “Ah!” (screams and pleas for mercy)
“Hit her!” (repeated several times)
“Kick her!”
“Stop recording!”
Bullying in China
Bullying in Chinese schools is a significant and complex issue, with research indicating a high prevalence. A 2016 nationwide survey of over 100,000 students across 29 counties found that 33.36% of students experienced bullying, with 4.7% reporting frequent incidents and 28.66% occasional ones. However, reported statistics vary widely; one study cited in a YouTube video claims 75% of children in China have experienced bullying, while another suggests only 11% report being bullied, highlighting inconsistencies in measurement and definition. This discrepancy underscores the difficulty in accurately assessing the scope of the problem.
The nature of bullying in China is often described as more indirect and subtle compared to physical bullying common in Western countries. Tactics frequently involve social exclusion, verbal abuse, and psychological torment, such as mocking a student’s appearance or using symbolic items (e.g., watermelon-themed objects) to humiliate them in a way that may not be immediately obvious to adults. Group dynamics play a central role, with bullying typically involving multiple students ganging up on a single victim, reflecting China’s collectivist culture where group identity can reduce individual accountability.
The causes of bullying are multifaceted. Research identifies factors such as family environment, including authoritarian parenting and corporal punishment, which may model aggressive behavior. The influence of Confucian values and social Darwinism—where success is tied to competition and survival of the fittest—can justify bullying against those perceived as weak, such as students with poor academic performance or social awkwardness. Additionally, the normalization of teacher-led humiliation and physical punishment in schools may contribute to students imitating such behavior.
Bullying in Japan
Bullying in Japan, known as “ijime,” remains a persistent and serious issue across all school levels, with recent data indicating a record high in incidents. In fiscal year 2024, the Japanese education ministry confirmed 769,022 cases of bullying, marking the fourth consecutive year of record-high numbers and an increase of approximately 36,400 from the previous year. The majority of cases occurred at elementary schools (610,612), followed by junior high schools (135,865), with smaller numbers at senior high schools (18,891) and special needs schools (3,654).
The problem is particularly severe in terms of its consequences, with serious cases such as suicide and truancy rising to a record 1,405, an increase of 99 from the previous year. This reflects a broader trend of escalating severity, with incidents often involving group dynamics where a student perceived as “different” is ostracized by peers, sometimes leading to the entire class participating in the bullying. This form of group bullying, or “shūdan ijime,” is deeply rooted in Japanese societal values that emphasize conformity and group harmony, where deviation from the norm is met with social punishment.