Tag: medical science
Canadian Doctors Suggest Harvesting Organs From Euthanasia Patients Before They’re Dead
Canadian doctors have suggested killing euthanasia victims by taking their organs, according to multiple reports, whistleblowers, and public talks. Medical freedom advocates are documenting emerging ties between “medical assistance in dying” (MAID) and organ harvesting.
“The best use of my organs, if I’m going to receive a medically assisted death, might be to not first kill me and then retrieve my organs, but to have my mode of death — as we medically consider death now — to be to retrieve my organs,” said Rob Sibbald, an ethicist of the London Health Sciences Centre in Ontario.
Other Canadian doctors have publicly embraced “death by donation,” and a study came out earlier this year exploring euthanasia programs such as MAID as a means of organ harvesting. Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016, and since then the number of Canadians using MAID to kill themselves has significantly increased.
Broken Truth: Ivermectin, Cancer, and SV40 with Kevin McKernan
COVID-19 Vaccines: A Risk Factor for Cerebral Thrombotic Syndromes
Plain language title and summary
COVID-19 Vaccines: A Risk Factor for Stroke
This research sought to determine if there is an increased risk of stroke in patients after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Cerebral venous thrombosis was of particular interest because this rare variant of stroke is generally seen in younger women of child-bearing potential due to the physiological risk factors inherent to this patient population.
Using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), reports of stroke were extracted from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2023.VAERS case numbers after the COVID-19 vaccines were compared to the numbers after the influenza vaccines as well as to all vaccines in the database.
There were 5137 cases of cerebral thromboembolism in 36 months after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 cases for the influenza vaccines over a period of 408 months and 282 cases for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) in 408 months. The alarming number of reports of stroke in VAERS after the COVID-19 vaccines over a much shorter period of time demonstrate an unacceptable risk for this serious complication.
Given VAERS very low rate of reporting, these figures are deeply alarming. ABN
New-onset psychosis following COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review
Conclusion
Studies on psychiatric side effects post-COVID-19 vaccination are limited, and making conclusions on vaccine advantages or disadvantages is challenging. Vaccination is generally safe, but data suggest a potential link between young age, mRNA, and viral vector vaccines with new-onset psychosis within 7 days post-vaccination. Collecting data on vaccine-related psychiatric effects is crucial for prevention, and an algorithm for monitoring and treating mental health reactions post-vaccination is necessary for comprehensive management.
17,000 doctors oppose RFK becoming HHS Director
During covid only some 500 American doctors opposed the lockdowns, the banning of early treatments, forced hospital death protocols, Remdesivir, vax mandates, etc.
The vast majority of the 17,000, if not all of them, were silent during our worst health crisis. Many even actively supported the pseudo-science.
Therefore, there is every reason not to listen to them on this topic or any other public health topic.
Behavioral and Health Outcomes of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case-Control Study in Japanese Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises
Conclusions
The study observed a higher reported incidence of COVID-19 infection among vaccinated individuals during the pandemic period, which increased with the number of vaccine doses received. This paradoxical finding may be influenced by various factors, including immune response mechanisms, such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) or original antigenic sin, behavioral changes, and exposure risk. Understanding these factors is crucial for urgently enhancing public health strategies and vaccination programs.
An obvious rise in US disabilities occurs in early 2021
Brain Surgeon vs Pharma Lobbyist: Psyops, Censorship & Globalism | Jack Kruse & Calley Means
UPDATE: I have watched two hours and forty-three minutes of this discussion. I rarely watch podcasts for this long. I found this one weirdly spell-binding because, though all of the speakers are very articulate, this ‘discussion’ is a remarkable example of how badly real people really talk. The entire content can be summarized in a few words. Jack wants to ban the vax on Trump Day One. Calley wants to go more slowly, be politic about it. Mary agrees with Jack but can see Calley’s POV. Danny is unable to boil it down so it goes on and on. It’s worth watching because the psycholinguistics are so simple and also so tangled it becomes a work of disaster art or disperformance art. ABN
Paul Offit Overt Errors — Kevin McKernan
The Forgotten Dangers of Ultrasound
Story at a Glance:
•The medical field has had a long history of exposing mothers to “treatments” that harm their infants. After decades of work to stop the routine x-raying of fetuses, the “safe and effective” practice of prenatal ultrasound (US) was adopted in its place.•While US is thought to be safe, there are decades of research showing it can harm tissues. Initially, this was well recognized, but as the ultrasound industry took off, it became a forgotten side of medicine, and research in this area became almost impossible to conduct.
• There is a large body of evidence showing fetuses are particularly vulnerable to US. Most concerningly, dozens of trials were conducted in China immediately prior to mothers planning to have abortions, which showed giving an US beforehand clearly damaged fetal tissues.
•The harms of US are dose dependent. Unfortunately, in 1992, despite widespread concerns about the safety of prenatal US (e.g., CNN did a program on it) the FDA chose to raise the permissible US levels 8-fold (and often more). Given that the studies showing the dangers of US were conducted at levels far below the original threshold, this increase is quite concerning, and may have played a pivotal role in the outbreak of chronic childhood illnesses that occurred around this time.
•Conversely, the benefits of prenatal US are often vastly overstated, and in many cases put mothers on unnecessary “treatment” plans which harm them and their infants.
Scientists reveal breakthrough… and tell why thousands of women with breast cancer may soon be told they don’t need ANY treatment
Roughly 56,000 British women each year are given the terrifying news that they have breast cancer.
It’s a life-changing diagnosis not least because, almost always, it is followed by invasive biopsies, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and hormone treatments that, in younger women, induce the menopause.
But could all that be set to change? Indeed, could many thousands of women told they have the disease not need a jot of treatment whatsoever?
The provocative answer, according to a growing number of the world’s leading specialists, is yes. The results of a major trial, announced last week, showed it was perfectly safe – perhaps even a better option – to simply ‘watch and wait’ with certain breast cancers, known as ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS.
No surgery, no medication – just a check-up twice a year. DCIS are tiny tumours, confined to the milk ducts in the breasts, which usually cause no symptoms and cannot be felt.
They account for about a quarter of all breast cancer diagnoses and most are discovered only during routine mammograms (breast X-rays).
American Buddhist Net 