Government corruption and Pizzagate

I am linking this post because I think it’s credible and worthy of further investigation.

On The Legitimacy Of This Investigation (with an important message to fellow journalists I know are lurking on this sub)

We are told the work on /r/Pizzagate (and other message boards) is illegitimate because people are rushing to conclusions, or because they are being paranoid, or partisan (despite so many of different political complexions provably working together). The subtitle here of course is that the State is solely legitimate to suspect and investigate crimes.

But what if the State itself is, in a systemic way, responsible for said crimes? It wouldn’t be a first; after all, democide (death by government, a word surprisingly absent from conversations) was the first cause of non-natural deaths in the 20th century. Whether one is from the right, left, or center, one cannot deny government is the number one abuser, enslaver and serial-killer in History. We may honestly disagree on the ways to eradicate the phenomenon, or we may regret that fact, but we cannot deny it.

So, if the State itself is committing crimes, it is the people’s sovereign and sacred duty to expose it. Those who understand this truth best tend to become journalists. At least, that’s what drove me to the profession.

Some people say that Pizzagate is disinformation designed to hide the disappearance of Julian Assange.

This could be what it really is. But it could also be that the Podesta emails released by Wikileaks have revealed a reality much darker than most of us expected.

I have personal knowledge of one person who was near the top of the Franklin Coverup, a story which broke in the 1990s. My knowledge of that person is sufficient to show me that he was part of a much larger network that extended far beyond Omaha, Nebraska.

Though never proved, the Franklin Coverup purportedly extended deep into Washington, DC.

Spirit cooking

If you’ve never gone down the rabbit hole, this is the time to begin.

See this for starters: https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794455959133298688

That is WikiLeaks second tweet on the subject of spirit cooking. Watch the video if you can.

WikiLeaks has a ten-year perfect record of zero forgeries. So their credibility is very good.

My guess is this spirit cooking information is being released to prepare the public for much worse information soon to come.

There have been rumors that tomorrow (11/05) is going to be a very big day, with a major FBI bust forecast.

Scroll down this page a few posts to find the Steve Pieczenik videos from 11/01. These were also likely designed to prepare the public for something very bad.

None of this is confirmed, but we do have strong indications that what is coming is a bust of a pedophile ring or, worse, a Satanic pedophile ring that involves top Democrats.

For more updates see: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/

Edit 1 PM EST: This story has now made MSM: WikiLeaks ‘spirit cooking’ tweet gets Twitter boiling  and WikiLeaks: Podesta invited to ‘Spirit’ dinner; host’s known ‘recipes’ demand breast milk, sperm.

The FBI Oath

“I [name] do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Much of the news we are now getting on the Weiner computer find and from Wikileaks has been provided by patriotic FBI people and the NYPD. There has been very little reporting on this all-important news in most of the MSM.

Fox news is the only exception as of this morning. Bret Baier, Catherine Herridge, Sean Hannity and a few others at Fox are reporting this blockbuster information.

The other place you can get good info is on the subreddit The Donald. There is also rumor and unsubstantiated claims on this site because it is a social media site with all that entails. Still, some of the best research on the Podesta emails and the Weiner computer has been done by people who contribute to that subreddit.

Notice in the oath above that agents swear to “defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”

I deeply respect people who uphold their oaths of office in spite of what may happen to them for doing so. That is the line between civilization and barbarism.

 

Followup video from Steve Pieczenik

What he says in this video about the Clintons has been a rumor for some time. Given yesterday’s release by the FBI of documents related to Bill Clinton’s very dubious pardon of Marc Rich, I am more inclined to think that Pieczenik is telling the truth.

His first video and more about Steve Pieczenik can be found here.

Good piece on James Comey

I really hope this is true. I can’t help it, but I trust Comey (or really want to) and I know that if the FBI director is corrupt, our nation is doomed.

There are many theories about what is happening with the Weiner email find and what those docs mean, and sometimes the details get in the way of a good overview.

This is a very good overview by Scott Adams. Highly recommended: James Comey – As seen through the Persuasion Filter.

So allow me to offer an interpretation of events that casts Comey as more of a patriot and hero than an ass-covering weasel. Compare my interpretation with whatever movie you have in your head and see which one works best for explaining and predicting.

Another theory is that Comey was forced to reopen the investigation because top FBI people were resigning over his not recommending prosecution. Also have read Comey’s wife was against what he did. Also, this: CNN: FBI discovered new emails weeks ago; stash includes classified emails “likely” deleted by Clinton.

It’s all just speculation as of this morning, but there almost certainly is something very big in the new find.

If you want the latest most up-to-date info on this issue, including plenty of speculation, go here.

EDIT 11/01: A strong counterargument to the above is that Comey did a fake investigation in the first place and in so doing has pissed off the majority of FBI people. To correct this and because explosive new evidence has been found, he sent the letter to Congress. Here is a presentation of that argument:

A Buddhist perspective on money in politics

In Buddhist thinking, money is good if it is acquired honestly and used intelligently, morally and for good purposes.

In the USA, during this presidential campaign we often see headlines saying that Hillary has raised more money for her campaign than Donald has for his. The implication is that she is probably going to win and that her money-raising skills are better than his.

Here is a detailed comparison on the two candidates: Tracking the 2016 Presidential Money Race.

Hillary Clinton continues to dominate the money race—now having raised more than $1 billion this election—thanks in large part to a cadre of wealthy donors sending tens of millions of dollars into super-PACs. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been poured into television advertisements on her behalf as well as get-out-the-vote efforts in battleground states across the country. Even so, Clinton still has more cash in the bank heading into the final days of the campaign, giving her a significant advantage for mobilizing voters and getting her message out.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, has relied mainly on his own wealth and millions of small donations to fund his campaign. He paid for his Republican primary victory mostly out of his own pocket, and only began actively soliciting outside funds in May. Since then, he’s never closed the fundraising gap with Clinton. [emphasis added]

From an American media point of view, Hillary is winning in the money department. But from a Buddhist point of view, she is not. From a Buddhist point of view, Trump is doing much better with money than Hillary.

The reasons are:

  1. Trump is doing as well if not better than Hillary with voters while using less money. This shows he is spending wisely.
  2. More importantly, Trump is using “mainly his own wealth and millions of small donations to fund his campaign.” This shows he is generous and willing to give back to the country that allowed him to gain so much. Furthermore, his donations are coming from ordinary Americans while Hillary’s are coming from “a cadre of wealthy donors,” who we all know expect to receive returns on their investments.

It’s true Trump is wealthier than Hillary, but Hillary and Bill acquired a fortune of some $250 million since Bill left office, so she could easily afford to kick in $30 million if she wanted to.

Moreover, it seems clear that Hillary’s wealth was not acquired in an ethically sound manner. She neither produced nor invented anything. Instead, it appears that her fortune is based on selling government influence.

Money acquired in that way harms the American people because our assets are being sold for pennies on the dollar, and all the pennies go to Hillary. Hillary’s campaign finances are another example of this pattern of benefiting herself by catering to the wealthy at the expense of ordinary Americans.

No one is perfect, including Donald Trump, but from a Buddhist point of view his use of money is much better than Hillary’s.