These are the sniper drones they are allowing us to know about.
It is reasonable to wonder if Charlie Kirk was killed by something like one of these, possibly smaller and more advanced, with capabilities we can only imagine — for example, a drone that fires a tiny homing projectile which self-destructs within a fraction of a second after hitting its target. ABN
This angle appears to show the back of Kirk’s shirt rising before the front of his shirt.
This supports the hypothesis that he was shot (probably in the ear) from his right and slightly behind.
This observation is supported by other videos which show the wire from his earpiece flying away from his head’s right side, while the thick cable around his neck and attached to that wire is suddenly pulled up and around the back of his neck.
Since we do not see his earpiece fly away from his head in any video but only its wiring, we can presume with some certainty that Kirk was struck directly in his earpiece, after which the projectile went through his head and exited from his neck’s lower left.
If Kirk was struck by a projectile which targeted his earpiece, and thus went directly into his ear, it is not unreasonable to hypothesize that the projectile was programmed to target a signal emitted by his earpiece, thus assuring perfect accuracy.
There are numerous videos and photos of super-fast mini-drones present at the rally while Kirk was speaking.
These drones are reported to have reached estimated speeds of 150mph, which would indicate they were military-grade and probably operated by a government or a very wealthy private organization.
A drone like that would likely have capabilities beyond just flying fast.
These capabilities might include the ability to shoot small projectiles with great accuracy after homing in on a signal; in this case a signal from Kirk’s earpiece.
It’s also possible the projectile itself was a super-fast mini-missile which was capable of homing in on a signal produced by Kirk’s earpiece.
If both of these conditions are true, perfect accuracy would be assured.
The tiny projectile/ missile would enter Kirk’s head through a direct hit on his earpiece.
This would conceal the entry wound from video evidence. So far, we have no video evidence of an entry wound.
If Kirk was hit by a mini-missile, that projectile could have been programmed to self-destruct, thus explaining no evidence so far of any bullet having been found.
We are now left hoping there will be an honest autopsy.
Given the extremely weak and sloppy case case against Robinson and the slews of counter evidence to it, plus the long history of cases like this yielding dubious, at best, autopsies, it is all too likely we will never know who or what murdered Charlie Kirk. ABN
When I first encountered that theory, I didn’t care to even look at the arguments. I suspected people posting such theories of being cognitive-infiltrators or trolls. But then, the ballistic issues kept point me to that possibility, until I stumbled upon this 19-minute “breakdown” video by Ben Werhman, which I invite everyone to watch.
I am not sure this theory is correct, but I believe it is plausible and deserves consideration. However, I consider the trail of the freemasons, mentioned in this video, as a red herring (unless we’re talking of B’nai B’rith). In my view, the theory of Kirk’s fake death does not contradict the theory that Israel decided to eliminate Kirk for the reasons that have so widely circulated that even Netanyahu has felt the need to dismiss them. The theory of Kirk’s fake death simply means that Kirk was given the chance to be disappeared alive, instead of dead. That Israel masterminded the event is all the more likely that Kirk’s security was reportedly Israeli, as Kirk himself seems to imply in this conversation with Bill Maher: “If you want security, the Israeli know what’s their doing.” He is probably referring to the Zionist-owned Shaffer Security Group, who ended their contract with TPUSA in 2022, but reportedly reappeared for Kirk’s final event. A security team is supposed to secure the roofs, I remind you.
Ben Werhman’s theory is that Kirk’s gun wound and death was faked with a blood squib equipped with a small remote control explosive, exactly as they always do it in Hollywood. I will recap his arguments, and then I will see how this theory dovetails with another interesting theory concerning Erika Kirk.
A major factor supporting this hypothesis and video is we never see much blood on the ground, on other people, or in the scene of Kirk being carried to the SUV, a very unusual thing to do in a case like this.
Maybe by this point Kirk had already bled out, but where’s the blood in any of the earlier scenes?
I am posting this essay and video as speculative but significant information.
Guyénot provides some interesting conjecture on Erika Kirk in the article linked above.
None of this would be necessary if we had reason to believe the FBI. All of this is necessary since we have a very long history of reasons to not believe the FBI. ABN
UPDATE: I once assisted the FBI in a case that made national news.
The investigation went on for a number of weeks and I spent more than a few hours helping the FBI agent who asked many questions.
I am mentioning this because that agent was very good.
I knew many details of the case and she absorbed those details and other information I had with professional calm and clarity.
The end result was the FBI did not prosecute, which was the correct conclusion for them to have reached.
I helped with the case because I knew the parties involved were all innocent.
It’s good to remember there are many good people in our government. ABN
Though stated as factual, Peters’ analysis is speculative. And yet it’s somewhat convincing.
I have posted on Kirk’s mic and the probability it was the actual weapon, but Peters has added the suspicious brown shirt guy and the man who jumps over the table as plausible participants.
Filing this under ‘speculation’ but like all reasonable speculation, it is worth keeping in mind.
It is clear as of today that not nearly enough evidence of Robinson’s guilt has been presented to the public to make a strong case.
Indeed, the evidence presented so far looks like the kind of bogus narrative we find every single time something like this happens.Mind-control works best when the false narrative is presented immediately.
Moreover, Candace Owens has stated she has information that the FBI is pressing Utah authorities to close the case now because further inquiry will only spoil their Robinson-did-it story. ABN
UPDATE: No hand-off apparent in frame-by-frame video:
The screen stills before the shot that hit Kirk do show his earpiece but that same area is more vivid in the stills immediately following the shot.
This looks suggestive to me but not conclusive.
IF an Israeli-style exploding device armed with a self-destructing projectile is what caused Kirk’s death, what we can see in these stills might support that hypothesis.
IF he was shot from a rearward vantage, the movement of his head is well explained as is the exit wound on his neck’s left side (not seen in the above video).
IF he was hit by a bullet, it would have been a small caliber. But where is it?
IF he was hit by a self-destroying mini-missile, the evidence we see fits well.
IF he was killed by an Israeli-style self-destroying projectile device concealed in his earpiece, the video evidence also supports this.
All of this is speculation based on the low level of information available to the public. I dislike the way the FBI appears to be playing games with us through its meagre releases of information.
UPDATE: She claims there is no blood to be seen in the video from behind Kirk.
There is blood in many videos from the front, and on them it looks like it is gushing from a classic exit wound.
This all fits with the notion that Kirk was shot from behind and to his right.
The projectile (maybe not a bullet) appears to have hit his right ear and and exited his neck’s left side well below his left ear.
I think we should keep in mind that the projectile might have been a mini-missile programmed to home in on Kirk’s earpiece and possibly to disintegrate upon exit or after a preprogrammed very small fraction of a second; this would explain why no bullet has been found, or claimed to have been found.
What Candace might have seen in the rear video is Kirk’s head move left rapidly as the projectile strikes, but not the bleeding exit wound due to camera angle or the position of Kirk’s head.
There are videos and photos of super fast mini-drones at the event; it may be that one of them fired a tiny mini-missile that killed Kirk.
Another possibility is, recall the Israeli-made cell phones that blew up in people’s pockets. Kirk’s earpiece may have held something similar but that acted like a bullet.
If so, the forensic evidence would show an obliterated earpiece, a projectile tunnel through his head, and the exit wound. This would look to honest investigators like a bullet had struck his earpiece and continued on to the exit wound.
This would also explain why we can see the wire connected to his earpiece fly up and away from his right ear; and why the thicker cable it was attached to was pulled up violently under his shirt in front and around the back of his neck.
American Buddhist Net 