Tag: totalitarianism
Amelia Fagan explains recent Irish dystory
Eva Vlaardingerbroek banned from UK — ‘…not considered conducive to the public good’
Flawless Starmer (probably illegal in UK)
Countries with the most arrests for online comments
‘We need to control all the social platforms… And take control of what they are saying’ — Shlomo Kramer
__________
This appears to be the voice of Jewish Supremacy and Jewish Big Money scrambling to end free-speech rights in USA. JS has already succeed in criminalizing speech in the EU and other Western regions, but USA has the First Amendment, which so far is holding up sort of OK. Censorship is always used to hide truth and control populations. There is never a good reason to censor speech. ABN
__________

_________
Jefferson’s 1823 letter to John Adams authenticates the quote as part of a broader deist analysis of religions, describing Jewish ideas of God as “degrading and injurious” while contrasting them with rational ethics.
UK: How Reporting Facts Can Now Land You in Jail for 14 Years as a Terrorist
Starmer’s government has set the most dangerous of precedents: it can now outlaw any political group it chooses as a terrorist organisation – and thereby make it impossible to defend it
The moment the British government began proscribing political movements as terrorist organisations, rather than just militant groups, it was inevitable that saying factual things, making truthful statements, would become a crime.
And lo behold, here we are.
The Terrorism Act 2000 has a series of provisions that make it difficult to voice or show any kind of support for an organisation proscribed under the legislation, whether it is writing an article or wearing a T-shirt.
Recent attention has focused on Section 13, which is being used to hound thousands of mostly elderly people who have held signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.” They now face a terrorism conviction and up to six months in jail.
But an amendment introduced in 2019 to Section 12 of the Act has been largely overlooked, even though it is even more repressive. It makes it a terrorism offence for a person to express “an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation” and in doing so be “reckless” about whether anyone else might be “encouraged to support” the organisation.
It is hard to believe this clause was not inserted specifically to target the watchdog professions: journalists, human rights groups and lawyers. They now face up to 14 years in jail for contravening this provision.
Jewish Supremist response to criticism
__________
No one who actually watches Owens can honestly claim she is irrational, let alone so crazy she should be committed to a mental hospital.
She did at one point show the speaker had not been telling the truth and displays conspicuous self-aggrandizement.
Owens is the best reporter by far on the Charlie Kirk assassination.
Her work has been fascinating, factual and appropriately speculative.
Very importantly, it is crowd-sourced, which makes it super up-to-date and ever deepening, as new facts appear.
Owens is pioneering the journalism of the future. No one else is at her level.
If you have not been watching her, I highly recommend you start. This episode is topical and a good place to begin: Charlie’s Final Hours. What Else Is Josh Hammer Lying About? | Candace Ep 250.
As a side-note, Hammer appears to me to be a JS but I cannot be certain of that.
I can be certain, however, that his response is classic Bolshevik-era JS, where critics were cruelly incarcerated and silenced for ‘mental illness’, when all they were really doing is telling the truth, as is Candace. ABN
gloomy
Samantha Smith on police raid for speaking about UK rape gangs
__________
This police behavior is probably a runup to total mind-control over all topics not liked by ‘authorities’. It also seems to be the direction USA is heading in. ABN
Was the Bondi Beach terror attack a false flag?
Why not just cut the sh*t instead
‘The office is going to be revamped to be one of the highest profile offices in the State Department because that’s what the Secretary wants and that’s what the President wants’ — Rabbi Yehuda Kaploun
I hope Trump is doing this to allow this Jewish brand of ethnic and religious censorship to fully expose itself and die a natural death due to public exposure and opprobrium.
This office is going to be an enclave of Jewish Supremacy, always weighing their issues above all others.
Israel has killed, conservatively, 350,000 Gazans based on an obvious false flag attack.
To pretend it is antisemitic to not like that, and speak about it, is demonic.
To condemn the slaughter is also not in any way to support Hamas or terrorism in general.
Beyond all that, to notice that Jews have grossly outsized power and malign influence in USA and on US policies is not ‘Jew hate’; it’s simply the truth, which ironically is proved by this new Jewish censorship office being created. ABN







