Tag: totalitarianism

AI-monitored cow collar Halter receives $2 BILLION from Peter Thiel

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Let me explain what a $2 billion “cow collar” actually is

They put an AI collar on a cow. It tracks location. Health. Movement. Behavior. Every second of every day.

A farmer opens an app. Draws a line on a map. That line becomes a fence. No physical fence. No wall. Nothing visible.

When the cow gets close to the boundary.. the collar vibrates. The cow turns around. Within 10 days the animal doesn’t even test the boundary anymore. It just stays inside.

700,000 animals are already wearing them.

They called it a “cowgorithm.” They want you to laugh at it.

Now read the technology again without the word cow..

24/7 GPS tracking on every individual. Real time health and behavior monitoring. Invisible boundaries drawn from a phone. Movement controlled through vibration and sound. Subject learns compliance within days.

$2 billion. And guess who led the investment…

Peter Thiel. The same man who built Palantir. CIA backed surveillance from day one. The same man who just got a $10 billion Pentagon contract to run AI inside the military.

His entire career is building systems that track and control. Now he’s funding a collar that does exactly that.

They’re not investing in farming. The farming is the test…

Most people have no idea what’s coming…

link

__________

How will they get the chips into us? I suppose if you haven’t been chipped you won’t be able to access your digital allowance or cross digital boundaries. In that sense, the chip will be ‘voluntary’ and no one will force you to accept it, just as no one ‘forced’ anyone to take the covid bioweapon vax. Our digital allowance will surely be based on our social credit scores. ABN

Report: Pentagon to Adopt Palantir as Core U.S. Military System

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Recently when the Anthropic software and ideology conflict with the Pentagon surfaced as a result of limits placed by the provider, alternative provider Palantir’s CEO remarked that any AI developer who challenges the U.S. military application of the product was foolish because the U.S. government could just take control of the company under the claim of national security.

In essence, Palantir CEO Alex Karp was saying AI developers who contract with the govt ultimately become bound to the limits or lack thereof as determined by the govt.  If software developers want to contract with the military, then fight the Pentagon over use of those software applications, they will lose.

In response to the Anthropic issue, the Pentagon withdrew from their purchase arrangements and blacklisted them from further federal contracts.

Now a report is highlighting that Palantir will take the lead position in providing the software, the Maven Smart System, for the core U.S. military functions.

As described, “Maven is a software platform that uploads information from drones, satellites, sensors, radar, and other battlefield intelligence sources. The system then analyzes battlefield data in real time, identifying and prioritizing potential targets — including buildings, enemy vehicles, and weapons and ammunition stockpiles — for intelligence analysts to review and act on.”

link

‘We need to control all the social platforms… And take control of what they are saying’ — Shlomo Kramer

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

link

__________

This appears to be the voice of Jewish Supremacy and Jewish Big Money scrambling to end free-speech rights in USA. JS has already succeed in criminalizing speech in the EU and other Western regions, but USA has the First Amendment, which so far is holding up sort of OK. Censorship is always used to hide truth and control populations. There is never a good reason to censor speech. ABN

__________

_________

Jefferson’s 1823 letter to John Adams authenticates the quote as part of a broader deist analysis of religions, describing Jewish ideas of God as “degrading and injurious” while contrasting them with rational ethics.

UK: How Reporting Facts Can Now Land You in Jail for 14 Years as a Terrorist

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

Starmer’s government has set the most dangerous of precedents: it can now outlaw any political group it chooses as a terrorist organisation – and thereby make it impossible to defend it

The moment the British government began proscribing political movements as terrorist organisations, rather than just militant groups, it was inevitable that saying factual things, making truthful statements, would become a crime.

And lo behold, here we are.

The Terrorism Act 2000 has a series of provisions that make it difficult to voice or show any kind of support for an organisation proscribed under the legislation, whether it is writing an article or wearing a T-shirt.

Recent attention has focused on Section 13, which is being used to hound thousands of mostly elderly people who have held signs saying: “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.” They now face a terrorism conviction and up to six months in jail.

But an amendment introduced in 2019 to Section 12 of the Act has been largely overlooked, even though it is even more repressive. It makes it a terrorism offence for a person to express “an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation” and in doing so be “reckless” about whether anyone else might be “encouraged to support” the organisation.

It is hard to believe this clause was not inserted specifically to target the watchdog professions: journalists, human rights groups and lawyers. They now face up to 14 years in jail for contravening this provision.

link

Jewish Supremist response to criticism

~ ABN ~ Leave a comment

__________

No one who actually watches Owens can honestly claim she is irrational, let alone so crazy she should be committed to a mental hospital.

She did at one point show the speaker had not been telling the truth and displays conspicuous self-aggrandizement.

Owens is the best reporter by far on the Charlie Kirk assassination.

Her work has been fascinating, factual and appropriately speculative.

Very importantly, it is crowd-sourced, which makes it super up-to-date and ever deepening, as new facts appear.

Owens is pioneering the journalism of the future. No one else is at her level.

If you have not been watching her, I highly recommend you start. This episode is topical and a good place to begin: Charlie’s Final Hours. What Else Is Josh Hammer Lying About? | Candace Ep 250.

As a side-note, Hammer appears to me to be a JS but I cannot be certain of that.

I can be certain, however, that his response is classic Bolshevik-era JS, where critics were cruelly incarcerated and silenced for ‘mental illness’, when all they were really doing is telling the truth, as is Candace. ABN